You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
I also tried the ring strategy but, I did not like the fact that if you loose one server the ring may get broken.
Maybe this is still better in the end but when you have a lot of server it is more likely that one server may be removed from service.
This is why I am testing with a "master" node
Not sure what is you opinion
Example of broken state with a ring config and 4 servers:
/etc/init.d/kamailio_second stop
/etc/init.d/kamailio_third stop
/etc/init.d/kamailio_second start
You end up with
show dmq bus: first
host: 127.0.0.103 status: 8 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.104 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.102 status: 8 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.101 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 1
show dmq bus: second
host: 127.0.0.103 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.102 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 1
show dmq bus: third not running !
show dmq bus: fourth
host: 127.0.0.102 status: 8 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.103 status: 8 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.101 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.104 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 1
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.