sr-dev April 2025

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

14 participants
203 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] TOPOS removes via header when calling drop in event_route[topos:msg-outgoing] (Issue #4157)
by Brandon Armstead 02 Jun '25

02 Jun '25

CrazyTux created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4157) ### TOPOS removes via header ``` event_route[topos:msg-outgoing] { # Feature Flag is enabled ** problem occurs here ** if($sht(feature_flags=>kamailio-disable-internal-topos) == "true") { if(ds_is_from_list(KAM_SET_ID, 3, "sip:$sndto(ip):5060")) { drop; } } } ``` ### Troubleshooting - verified via exists in original 200 OK REPLY from Freeswitch - checked wire and verified via header is missing when forwarding 200 OK onward to next kamailio (B) node from Kamailio (A) #### Reproduction Call drop in event route `topos:msg-outgoing` - call flow: Freeswitch -> Kamailio A -> Kamailio B -> UAC - place incoming call into kamailio - put call on hold / reinvite #### Debugging Data ``` Disabling topos entirely via header is correctly sent from A -> B. ``` #### Log Messages (Kamailio B) ``` 2025-02-25T00:19:08.545447+00:00 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3959021]: ERROR: {2 1 INVITE 995df181-4eae-40ae-8225-427ce8252250} <core> [core/receive.c:542]: receive_msg(): no via found in reply 2025-02-25T00:19:09.045917+00:00 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3959037]: ERROR: {2 1 INVITE 995df181-4eae-40ae-8225-427ce8252250} <core> [core/receive.c:542]: receive_msg(): no via found in reply 2025-02-25T00:19:10.046936+00:00 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3958995]: ERROR: {2 1 INVITE 995df181-4eae-40ae-8225-427ce8252250} <core> [core/receive.c:542]: receive_msg(): no via found in reply 2025-02-25T00:19:12.048099+00:00 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3959003]: ERROR: {2 1 INVITE 995df181-4eae-40ae-8225-427ce8252250} <core> [core/receive.c:542]: receive_msg(): no via found in reply ``` #### SIP Traffic `reinvite B -> A:` ``` INVITE sip:mod_sofia@54.245.XX.XX:5060 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:35.161.XX.XX:5060;r2=on;lr;ftag=9vX27Um099jZS;did=a2b.7e62> Record-Route: <sip:35.161.XX.XX:7443;transport=ws;r2=on;lr;ftag=9vX27Um099jZS;did=a2b.7e62> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 35.161.XX.XX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK16be.085d2f3d83e8d939f7f1d3fbc4a5ff09.0 Via: SIP/2.0/WSS 74jssm3ooc66.invalid;received=209.160.251.114;branch=z9hG4bK3968143 To: <sip:9496294444@54.245.XX.XX>;tag=9vX27Um099jZS From: <sip:Dff742e5340fDd93847e@9e3f4e45-01cf-1f66-8d70-8d14ec555153>;tag=q1vfbk6o6q CSeq: 1 INVITE Call-ID: 995df181-4eae-40ae-8225-427ce8252250 Max-Forwards: 69 Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INFO,INVITE,MESSAGE,NOTIFY,OPTIONS,PRACK,REFER,REGISTER,SUBSCRIBE Contact: <sip:tu0r7r7u@74jssm3ooc66.invalid;transport=ws> Supported: outbound User-Agent: WebPhone/3.1740423483.87 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 1538 Route: <sip:34.213.XX.XX:5060;r2=on;lr;ftag=9vX27Um099jZS;did=a2b.1142>,<sip:34.213.XX.XX;r2=on;lr;ftag=9vX27Um099jZS;did=a2b.1142> P-SR-XUID: atpsh-7cde-67bcbccd-3c68ef-1 v=0 o=- 4757376688759011024 3 IN IP4 127.0.0.1 s=- t=0 0 a=group:BUNDLE 0 a=extmap-allow-mixed a=msid-semantic: WMS 35a33e17-dd80-46fa-afe9-72fdd03d4e41 m=audio 32999 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF 0 102 101 103 63 9 8 13 c=IN IP4 209.160.251.114 a=rtcp:9 IN IP4 0.0.0.0 a=candidate:2845667355 1 udp 2122260223 10.82.226.218 54425 typ host generation 0 network-id 1 network-cost 10 a=candidate:1750280017 1 udp 1686052607 209.160.251.114 32999 typ srflx raddr 10.82.226.218 rport 54425 generation 0 network-id 1 network-cost 10 a=ice-ufrag:Eb9h a=ice-pwd:nQdfpsILiUI+YKSQT3eZy52x a=ice-options:trickle a=fingerprint:sha-256 BA:68:25:D5:66:70:A9:17:38:18:74:0A:B3:C2:3E:F9:3A:A0:7C:5F:18:0F:EB:B7:93:28:86:56:62:23:DF:E5 a=setup:actpass a=mid:0 a=extmap:1 urn:ietf:params:rtp-hdrext:ssrc-audio-level a=extmap:2 http://www.webrtc.org/experiments/rtp-hdrext/abs-send-time a=extmap:3 http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-holmer-rmcat-transport-wide-cc-extensions-01 a=extmap:4 urn:ietf:params:rtp-hdrext:sdes:mid a=sendonly a=msid:35a33e17-dd80-46fa-afe9-72fdd03d4e41 57910219-943b-4687-9511-b9a9d0a1ea6f a=rtcp-mux a=rtcp-rsize a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:102 opus/48000/2 a=fmtp:102 minptime=10;useinbandfec=1 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=rtpmap:103 telephone-event/48000 a=rtpmap:63 red/48000/2 a=fmtp:63 102/102 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 a=ssrc:2604971680 cname:YEcJO5XrSKZor1jY a=ssrc:2604971680 msid:35a33e17-dd80-46fa-afe9-72fdd03d4e41 57910219-943b-4687-9511-b9a9d0a1ea6f ``` `200 OK Freeswitch -> A` ``` SIP/2.0 200 OK v:SIP/2.0/UDP 34.213.XX.XX:5060;branch=z9hG4bK16be.86ee5e1d4190783bd6a79bd21110d190.0 f:<sip:Dff742e5340fDd93847e@9e3f4e45-01cf-1f66-8d70-8d14ec555153>;tag=q1vfbk6o6q t:<sip:9496294444@54.245.XX.XX>;tag=9vX27Um099jZS i:995df181-4eae-40ae-8225-427ce8252250 CSeq:1 INVITE m:<sip:mod_sofia@54.245.XX.XX:5060> Accept:application/sdp Allow:INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,INFO,UPDATE,REGISTER,REFER,NOTIFY,PUBLISH,SUBSCRIBE k:timer,path,replaces x:90;refresher=uas c:application/sdp Content-Disposition:session l:284 v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1740424963 1740424965 IN IP4 54.245.XX.XX s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 54.245.XX.XX t=0 0 m=audio 17776 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=recvonly a=ptime:20 a=rtcp-mux a=rtcp:17776 IN IP4 54.245.XX.XX ``` `200 OK A -> B` ``` SIP/2.0 200 OK f:<sip:Dff742e5340fDd93847e@9e3f4e45-01cf-1f66-8d70-8d14ec555153>;tag=q1vfbk6o6q t:<sip:9496294444@54.245.XX.XX>;tag=9vX27Um099jZS i:995df181-4eae-40ae-8225-427ce8252250 CSeq:1 INVITE m:<sip:mod_sofia@54.245.XX.XX:5060> Accept:application/sdp Allow:INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,INFO,UPDATE,REGISTER,REFER,NOTIFY,PUBLISH,SUBSCRIBE k:timer,path,replaces x:90;refresher=uas c:application/sdp Content-Disposition:session l:315 v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1740424963 1740424965 IN IP4 34.211.XX.XX s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 34.211.XX.XX t=0 0 m=audio 20374 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=mid:0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=recvonly a=rtcp:20374 a=rtcp-mux a=ptime:20 a=ice-options:trickle a=end-of-candidates ``` ### Possible Solutions TBD ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.8.2 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 10.2.1 ``` <img width="629" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fc46f76e-7a6f-431f-a00e-84fbbece…" /> * **Operating System**: ``` No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) Release: 11 Codename: bullseye ``` I can provide PCAP as well if required. Let me know if additional information is required. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4157 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4157(a)github.com>

4 9

[kamailio/kamailio] tcp_timer_check_connections() logs on CRITICAL and is not caught by event_route[tcp:timeout] (Issue #3995)
by Fritjof Höst 02 Jun '25

02 Jun '25

### Description Hi! We are in the progress of upgrading from Kamailio 5.5 to 5.8. During our testing we have noticed a new error being reported from Kamailio. We don’t see any other errors following it. ```jsx /usr/sbin/kamailio[201]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:5544]: tcp_timer_check_connections(): message processing timeout on connection id: 67896 (state: 3) - closing ``` It does seem to be [new code](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/core/tcp_main.c#… in Kamailio reporting this issue. Given that this is a fairly expected thing, cleaning up a connection which receives no traffic within the given time, is there a need for it to be reported on CRITICAL? I’d also expect it to be caught by ``` event_route[tcp:timeout] { xlog("L_INFO","connection $conid timeouts (unanswered keepalives)"); } ``` given that [the description](https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tcpops.ht… of this one is `Called for connection timeouts (unanswered keepalives).`. ### Troubleshooting We don't have any way to reproduce it, we are still investigating it to figure out the cause. It happens around every 2 hours, so we think there might some some scheduled test or job running in our test system causing this. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - 5.8.3 * **Operating System**: Debian 12 AMI from the AWS Marketplace. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3995 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3995(a)github.com>

6 10

[kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine: fix race condn (same ip:port) in parallel forks due to gencookie (PR #4139)
by Souradeep Bera 01 Jun '25

01 Jun '25

- avoid parallel calls to gencookie from generating the same cookie for rtpengine #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4139 -- Commit Summary -- * rtpengine: fix race condn assigning same ip:port due to gencookie in parallel forks -- File Changes -- M src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c (3) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4139.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4139.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4139 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4139(a)github.com>

4 6

[kamailio/kamailio] Possibly adjusting the SDP parser to be more lenient towards scenarios where a stream is being removed/rejected and connection-information "c=" is only available per media (no session-wide "c=") and the removed/rejected stream omits all fields (Issue #3982)
by thomas414 31 May '25

31 May '25

### Description I encountered an issue with a specific device that is receiving a T.38 fax. The call gets established towards the device normally with inband media, then the device requests T.38 media and tries to remove the audio media via sending port 0 in the ReInvite SDP. Also it sends connection-information only on the media level and there is no "c=" on the session level. Reading through the related RFCs and the kamailio code and discussing this on the mailing list, we came to the conclusion that kamailio is doing everything correct as per RFC. Though we were wondering if it would be possible to adjust the parser to be not as strict as it is right now, and allow a missing "c=" line on the media-level if the stream is removed/rejected via port 0, since i see no sense in requiring connection information. Of course we are also in contact with the vendor to hopefully adjust on their side. Here are the related RFCs: 1. RFC8866 5.7 `A session description MUST contain either at least one "c=" line in each media description or a single "c=" line at the session level. It MAY contain a single session-level "c=" line and additional media-level "c=" line(s) per-media-description, in which case the media-level values override the session-level settings for the respective media.` 2. RFC3264 8.2 `Existing media streams are removed by creating a new SDP with the port number for that stream set to zero. The stream description MAY omit all attributes present previously, and MAY list just a single media format.` At first i was especially confused by the RFC3264 8.2 part, since it seemed correct what the device is sending, but if you read carefully and keep the wording for SDP in mind only attributes ("a=") MAY be omitted. So a "c=" line should still be in the SDP for the removed media if it's not included on the session-level. Or do you see this differently? ### Expected behavior Kamailio allows and parses the SDP when there is no session-wide "c=", a media stream is being removed via port zero and there is no "c=" for this media stream and only the remaining media streams include a "c=" line. #### Actual observed behavior Kamailio throws an error when trying to parse the SDP. #### Log Messages ``` <core> [core/parser/sdp/sdp.c:523]: parse_sdp_session(): can't find media IP in the message ``` #### SIP Traffic ``` v=0 o=xmserver 1726638425 1726638427 IN IP4 169.254.1.1 s=xmserver t=0 0 m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 8 m=image 56002 udptl t38 c=IN IP4 169.254.1.1 a=sendrecv a=T38FaxVersion:0 a=T38MaxBitRate:14400 a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval:0 a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR:0 a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG:0 a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:200 a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:72 a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy ``` ### Possible Solutions ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.8.3 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Debian 12 Linux hostname 6.1.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.85-1 (2024-04-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3982 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3982(a)github.com>

3 5

[kamailio/kamailio] Inactive video stream: can't find media IP in the message (Issue #3406)
by schoberw 31 May '25

31 May '25

### Description In some situations the other side UA must reply with an inactive media stream. E.g. if video was added but not supported by the other side. The UAS then must answer with an m=video 0 RTP/.. line. It seams that the video section must contain a c= line with an IP address for rtpengine to function. If there is no c line (no IP address) the SDP body cannot be parsed and thus no RTP proxy is invoked. ### Troubleshooting Not easy to reproduce since the answer must bei "wrong". Is it correct to reply an SDP body (media = video) like this? ``` m=video 0 RTP/AVPF 96 a=label:1 a=inactive a=mid:1 ``` Maybe not (but Audiocodes SBC lates LTS version does it) - so we are dependent on other side now that this service works. #### Reproduction reInvite with Video to a UA that has no video Support (e.g. Bria -> Snom). Drop the c line in the video part with some textops in 200 OK (just to reproduce of course). A -> B, connect the call A -> + video, B has no video support A presses hold #### Log Messages Incoming 200 OK after doing hold with an inactive video: ``` v=0 o=root 436040161 309284577 IN IP4 1.2.3.5 s=call t=0 0 m=audio 14200 RTP/AVPF 9 8 126 c=IN IP4 1.2.3.5 a=ptime:20 a=recvonly a=mid:0 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:126 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:126 0-15 m=video 0 RTP/AVPF 96 a=label:1 a=inactive a=mid:1 Mar 27 17:52:22 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2938205]: ERROR: <core> [core/parser/sdp/sdp.c:490]: parse_sdp_session(): can't find media IP in the message Mar 27 17:52:22 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2938205]: INFO: <script>: >>> Sending Reply: 200 OK (1.2.3.4:443 -> 100.108.48.38:65251) ``` Compare to working SDP parsing: ``` a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:126 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:126 0-15 m=video 0 RTP/AVP 96 c=IN IP4 1.2.3.5 a=inactive a=mid:1 Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: ONREPLY_ROUTE[FORWARD] Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: ROUTE[RTPP_REPLY] Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > 200 with video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > 200 with inactive video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > Remove inactive video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > Answer to WebRTC client: 200 - qijpuibkv6ufhnd282ks Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: >>> Sending Reply: 200 OK (91.237.65.14:443 -> 80.108.48.38:65388) ``` ### Possible Solutions Tried to fix in script: ``` if(sdp_with_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with video"); if(sdp_with_active_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with active video"); if(!sdp_with_active_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with inactive video"); if(sdp_with_media("video") && !sdp_with_active_media("video")) { # try fix for RMT#60189 xlog("L_INFO", "> Remove inactive video"); sdp_remove_media("video"); msg_apply_changes(); # needed? } ``` But since sdpops cannot parse it cannot remove the buggy media, too. See the log: non of the xlog is logging. If there is inactive media the c line is not mandatory. The parser should accept this by adding a default IP of 0.0.0.0, if needed Doing tricks with textops is not a easy nor performant solution to accept this wrong SDP from other parties. ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 10.2.1 ``` * **Operating System**: Debian Bullseye -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3406 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3406(a)github.com>

3 5

[kamailio/kamailio] dispatcher: weight documentation and workaround for limitations (PR #4158)
by Christian Berger 31 May '25

31 May '25

- describe limitation of weight parameter - describe a potential workaround against those limitations  #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [X] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [X] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [X] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [X] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [X] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [X] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  We had problems understanding the weight parameter of the dispatcher module and wrote a little workaround against the problems we have found. This workaround in the configuration file improves behavior for setups with many dispatcher targets at the cost of more CPU load. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4158 -- Commit Summary -- * dispatcher: weight documentation and workaround for limitations -- File Changes -- M src/modules/dispatcher/doc/dispatcher_admin.xml (28) A src/modules/dispatcher/doc/weights.cfg (49) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4158.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4158.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4158 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4158(a)github.com>

4 4

[kamailio/kamailio] kafka_send in event_route not work (Issue #4198)
by wangduanduan 31 May '25

31 May '25

wangduanduan created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4198)  ### Description kafka_send in event_route like tcp:timeout, tcp:closed not work ``` event_route[tcp:closed] { if (kafka_send("my_topic", "tcp:closed")) { xlog("L_INFO", "send success tcp:closed"); } } event_route[tcp:timeout] { if (kafka_send("my_topic", "tcp:timeout")) { xlog("L_INFO", "send success tcp:timeout"); } } ``` in log, its show "send success tcp:closed", "send success tcp:timeout", but in kafka web ui, in the **my_topic**, can't find the "tcp:closed" or " tcp:timeout" message. --- but if the kafka_send in onreply_route, message will be send ok, in the kafka web ui, the "some_route" can be find. ``` onreplay_route[some_route]{ if (kafka_send("my_topic", "some_routet")) { xlog("L_INFO", "send success some_routet"); } } ```  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic i use tcpdump to capture the traffic between kamailio and kafka. - when use kafka_send in event_route, no packages captured.  ``` ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` 5.6.1 ``` * **Operating System**: centos7  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4198 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4198(a)github.com>

5 10

[kamailio/kamailio] tls: Create one shared context and reuse it. (PR #3972)
by Xenofon Karamanos 28 May '25

28 May '25

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [x] Related to issue #3823 #### Description  This PR aims to implement what was discussed in [mailing list](https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/sr-dev@lists.kama… regarding some `tls.reload` and increasing memory usage. It adds a new parameter `enable_shared_ctx` in `tls` module that if set to 0, preserves the old behavior and if set to 1 (other than 0 tbh), it creates a single SSL context that is being shared. This have the effect of using way less memory when initialized as well, but also minimizes (can't say it fixes the problem) the `tls.reload` memory increase. I have also added a small markdown (comparison.md) file, where some comparisons where made between enabled/disabled shared context and with/without CA file (where the initial problem was occurring by the reporter). Feedback would be necessary to verify whether this patch, acts as expected and kamailio works as intented. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972 -- Commit Summary -- * tls: Add parameter for shared contexts * tls: Comparison for enable_shared_ctx -- File Changes -- A comparison.md (15) M src/modules/tls/tls_domain.c (172) M src/modules/tls/tls_mod.c (11) M src/modules/tls/tls_mod.h (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972(a)github.com>

4 12

[kamailio/kamailio] tcp_send_timeout does not apply for outbound connections (Issue #4187)
by Oleg Vedeneev 28 May '25

28 May '25

ovedeneev created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4187) ### Description [tcp_send_timeout](https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/5.8.x/core/#t… option does not apply for outbound connections. #### Reproduction 1. Establish TCP OPTIONS between Kamailio and target node. 2. On target node block incoming traffic from Kamailio node using iptables. 3. Notice on Kamailio node that TCP retransmission packets don't follow tcp_send_timeout settings, instead they fall back to kernel's net.ipv4.tcp_retries2 settings. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** ``` # kamailio -V version: kamailio 5.8.2 (aarch64/linux) 446039 flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 446039 compiled on 14:32:09 Nov 14 2024 with gcc 8.5.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Linux xxx 4.18.0-553.6.1.el8.aarch64 #1 SMP Thu May 30 04:10:32 UTC 2024 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4187 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4187(a)github.com>

3 2

[kamailio/kamailio] core: local TCP socket is bound on listening address (PR #3925)
by sergey-safarov 28 May '25

28 May '25

#### Pre-Submission Checklist - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [x] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist: - [x] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description As a local IP address for TCP sending operation the Kamailio service is taking the same network_interface/IP_address, which is used by the service for TCP listening. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925 -- Commit Summary -- * core: local TCP socket is bound on listening address -- File Changes -- M src/core/tcp_main.c (24) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925(a)github.com>

5 16

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev April 2025