sr-dev March 2024

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

14 participants
243 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] Close parenthesis on error description (#2589)

by Javier Valencia

Close parentheses on error description when *Not enough parameters* on *htable_rpc_delete*. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2589 -- Commit Summary -- * Close parenthesis on error description -- File Changes -- M src/modules/htable/htable.c (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2589.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2589.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2589

5 days, 18 hours

[kamailio/kamailio] topos: add enable_register_publish (PR #3766)

by Harish S

Added enable_register_publish parameter to enable REGISTER and PUBLISH method for topos If set to 1 REGISTER and PUBLISH will be enabled for topos Currently only via header will be applied for topos and if mask_callid is set to 1 call-ID will be masked. Other headers should be manged by the user as required.   #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766 -- Commit Summary -- * add enable_register_publish -- File Changes -- M src/modules/topos/topos_mod.c (2) M src/modules/topos/tps_msg.c (132) M src/modules/topos/tps_msg.h (2) M src/modules/topos/tps_storage.c (6) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766(a)github.com>

2 weeks, 1 day

[kamailio/kamailio] Wrong Route header order in called party re-INVITE when using topos (Issue #3778)

by Javi Montoro

Hi There, We found a situation where topos seems to break, let me explain... Assuming the following scenario: ``` Caller ---- Callee A: ------INVITE-----> Record-Route:A.A.A.A, Record-Route:B.B.B.B B: <-----200 OK------ C: <-----INVITE------ Route: A.A.A.A, B.B.B.B D: ------200 OK-----> Record-Route:B.B.B.B, Record-Route:A.A.A.A (reversed order) E: <======INVITE===== Route: B.B.B.B, A.A.A.A (wrong) ``` A and B establish the connection from caller to callee, and topos works fine. C (re-INVITE from callee) sends the Route header according to the Record-Routes from the original INVITE (A) D is the 200 OK sent from the caller to the first re-INVITE (C) coming from the callee, with the Record-Route headers reversed, because is the order in which the callee received them; and according to the RFC it's working as intended: ``` When a UAS responds to a request with a response that establishes a dialog (such as a 2xx to INVITE), the UAS MUST copy all Record-Route header field values from the request into the response (including the URIs, URI parameters, and any Record-Route header field parameters, whether they are known or unknown to the UAS) and MUST maintain the order of those values. [...] [When a UAC receives a response...] The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving all URI parameters. ``` E takes the Route order from the last 200 OK ignoring they are in reversed order and assuming the top one is the first one, when it should be the other way around, sending to an IP address not reachable from the callee. And I think here is the issue, topos should not update the path on the Record-Routes from a 200 OK but if it does, it should take the reverse order When disabling topos, everything works fine, or with topos enabled, by setting rr_update=0 works for us, but what if there is a real path update, rr_update=0 wouldn't work for us anymore. The Kamailio version is 5.8.0-rc0 Let me know if you need more information. Thanks a lot, Javi -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3778 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3778(a)github.com>

4 weeks

[kamailio/kamailio] no corresponding socket found error (Issue #3583)

by descartin

Hello all we are seeing these kind of logs in a Debian GNU/Linux 11 using kamailio 5.5.6 ```Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155702]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[164.152.22.248:5060](http://164.152.22.248:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155698]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.184:5060](http://208.74.138.184:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155695]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.181:5060](http://208.74.138.181:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155693]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[38.102.250.60:5060](http://38.102.250.60:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:302]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket for "87.1.1.27" af 2 Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:470]: prepare_new_uac(): can't fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no corresponding listening socket) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155697]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.184:5060](http://208.74.138.184:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155694]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[192.40.216.97:5060](http://192.40.216.97:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155694]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.180:5060](http://208.74.138.180:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155714]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/)) ``` The kamailio instance we are using is receiving around 1500 calls per second in average when we do start seeing these errors more frequently In this instance we are using multihomed the listen address list is ``` children=14 socket_workers=1 listen=udp:[192.168.99.70:5081](http://192.168.99.70:5081/) listen=udp:[192.168.99.81:5060](http://192.168.99.81:5060/) listen=udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/) listen=tcp:[192.168.96.105:8095](http://192.168.96.105:8095/) listen=tcp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/) tcp_children=6 port=5060 ``` We use the first worker only to perform the OPTIONS requests from the dispatcher module. The sockets listen=udp:[192.168.99.81:5060](http://192.168.99.81:5060/) listen=udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/) are used to communicate both A and B legs so when a message is received at [192.168.99.81:5060](http://192.168.99.81:5060/) we send it to [87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/) and viceversa We were using $fs variable before doing the t_relay() function. This way is working, but when load increases, seems sometimes kamailio doesn't get the proper socket to forward the reply. I think the errors mainly are related to responses which are being forwarded, like if the function get_sock_info_list was not able to retrieve the listen interfaces we have tried to set in the onreply routes the commands set_recv_socket("udp:[192.168.99.81:5060](http://192.168.99.81:5060/)"); set_send_socket("udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/)"); (when reply goes from private to public domain) and it seems it reduces the number of ``` Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155702]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[164.152.22.248:5060](http://164.152.22.248:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155698]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.184:5060](http://208.74.138.184:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155695]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.181:5060](http://208.74.138.181:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155693]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[38.102.250.60:5060](http://38.102.250.60:5060/)) errors ``` But i honestly don't know why the ```Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:302]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket for "87.1.1.27" af 2 Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:470]: prepare_new_uac(): can't fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no corresponding listening socket) appear ``` We also tried to increase the kernel buffers rmem and wmem from 208KB (as we had by default) to 4MB Do you know a reason which could cause these logs to appear? Any setup that could mitigate them? thanks a lot and regards david escartin -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3583 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3583(a)github.com>

2 months, 1 week

[kamailio/kamailio] BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f19a3edec68), called from tls: tls_init.c with random core dumps (Issue #3205)

by Tim Chubb

### Description  Im getting frequent log entries like this: `CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f19a3edec68), called from tls: tls_init.c: ser_free(323), first free tls: tls_init.c: ser_free(323) - ignoring` This on a fresh VM running Ubuntu 22.04 LTS on the 5.6 branch (building latest release tag) As well as that log message being printed on a frequent basis (every 2 to 3 mins) i am experiencing random crashes/restarts of kamailio. Looking at the core dumps tls_init seems to precipitate the core dump. I have tried using both the TLS module, and TLSA, in the case of TLSA to rule out OpenSSL3 being an issue i have tried linking against locally built OpenSSL 3.0.5 and OpenSSL 1.1.1q with identical results I am in the process of repeating the build on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS to rule out weirdness with packages and similar issues i have experienced whilst evaluating 22.04 LTS ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (gdb) bt full #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (no_tid=0, signo=6, threadid=140425701996352) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44 tid = <optimized out> ret = 0 pd = 0x7fb76815b740 old_mask = {__val = {523986010119, 910533066753, 1, 140425395047168, 94230980435360, 0, 5677797456, 140425395047168, 140725986283600, 140425393986269, 94230963279192, 140425395047168, 94230963279402, 7970739754, 140725986283664, 140425394028321}} ret = <optimized out> pd = <optimized out> old_mask = <optimized out> ret = <optimized out> tid = <optimized out> ret = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> __arg3 = <optimized out> __arg2 = <optimized out> __arg1 = <optimized out> _a3 = <optimized out> _a2 = <optimized out> _a1 = <optimized out> __futex = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> __arg3 = <optimized out> __arg2 = <optimized out> __arg1 = <optimized out> _a3 = <optimized out> _a2 = <optimized out> _a1 = <optimized out> __futex = <optimized out> __private = <optimized out> __oldval = <optimized out> result = <optimized out> #1 __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=140425701996352) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78 No locals. #2 __GI___pthread_kill (threadid=140425701996352, signo=signo@entry=6) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89 No locals. #3 0x00007fb7681a0476 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26 ret = <optimized out> #4 0x00007fb7681867f3 in __GI_abort () at ./stdlib/abort.c:79 save_stage = 1 act = {__sigaction_handler = {sa_handler = 0x100000000, sa_sigaction = 0x100000000}, sa_mask = {__val = {140425395047168, 140725986283888, 140425393986269, 140425394365984, 140425394130944, 140425394801736, 5734026312, 140725986283952, 140425394028321, 15624006419995803439, 94230961557227, 94230963279168, 94230963279576, 140425422497024, 13020282480951897856, 72}}, sa_flags = -619194838, sa_restorer = 0x0} sigs = {__val = {32, 13020282480951897856, 140725986284000, 94230961610857, 13546569962021497653, 14189927350396752214, 94230962920532, 0, 94230963279402, 140425394130944, 10, 38654707763, 12, 140425395047168, 32, 1438623432}} #5 0x000055b3dafd8f12 in qm_debug_check_frag (qm=0x7fb755bc1000, f=0x7fb7576ce500, file=0x7fb766123154 "tls: tls_init.c", line=323, efile=0x55b3db17d559 "core/mem/q_malloc.c", eline=511) at core/mem/q_malloc.c:129 p = 0x7fb755ca0b00 __func__ = "qm_debug_check_frag" #6 0x000055b3dafdd788 in qm_free (qmp=0x7fb755bc1000, p=0x7fb7576ce538, file=0x7fb766123154 "tls: tls_init.c", func=0x7fb766124990 <__func__.0> "ser_free", line=323, mname=0x7fb766123150 "tls") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:511 qm = 0x7fb755bc1000 f = 0x7fb7576ce500 size = 24 next = 0x7fb7576ce500 prev = 0x7fb7576ce3f8 __func__ = "qm_free" #7 0x000055b3dafe954e in qm_shm_free (qmp=0x7fb755bc1000, p=0x7fb7576ce538, file=0x7fb766123154 "tls: tls_init.c", func=0x7fb766124990 <__func__.0> "ser_free", line=323, mname=0x7fb766123150 "tls") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:1350 No locals. #8 0x00007fb7660db698 in ser_free (ptr=0x7fb7576ce538, fname=0x7fb765efa6e5 "../crypto/err/err_local.h", fline=88) at tls_init.c:323 __func__ = "ser_free" #9 0x00007fb765d2e907 in ERR_pop_to_mark () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.3 No symbol table info available. #10 0x00007fb765d76a42 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.3 No symbol table info available. #11 0x00007fb765d669f5 in EVP_PKEY_set_type_by_keymgmt () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.3 No symbol table info available. #12 0x00007fb765d5ef9a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.3 No symbol table info available. #13 0x00007fb765d69973 in EVP_PKEY_generate () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.3 No symbol table info available. #14 0x00007fb766029279 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.3 No symbol table info available. #15 0x00007fb76607a621 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.3 No symbol table info available. --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--c #16 0x00007fb7660687fd in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.3 No symbol table info available. #17 0x00007fb766104216 in tls_accept (c=0x7fb7576db4e8, error=0x7ffd526c58a4) at tls_server.c:468 ret = 1382832224 ssl = 0x7fb75755bef0 cert = 0x7fb75742dbb0 tls_c = 0x7fb7574429a8 tls_log = 1712337076 __func__ = "tls_accept" pkey = 0x0 #18 0x00007fb76610f86d in tls_h_read_f (c=0x7fb7576db4e8, flags=0x7ffd526e5dac) at tls_server.c:1173 r = 0x7fb7576db610 bytes_free = 16383 bytes_read = 150 read_size = 16383 ssl_error = 0 ssl_read = 0 ssl = 0x7fb75755bef0 rd_buf = "\026\003\003\000\221\001\000\000\215\003\003b\347\222\177\213T\226\b\b\214\273\355\255[l\354\211\371rJ;<\033\356B\374y\024cg\352\067\000\000\020\300\060\300/\300(\300'\300,\300+\300$\300#\001\000\000T\000\000\000\022\000\020\000\000\rdr.teamsdr.uk\000\005\000\005\001\000\000\000\000\000\n\000\006\000\004\000\030\000\027\000\v\000\002\001\000\000\r\000\024\000\022\004\001\005\001\002\001\004\003\005\003\002\003\002\002\006\001\006\003\000#\000\000\000\027\000\000\377\001\000\001\000G\225 E\030j\223\313Hb\244@\271\323\030GQ\254\272\024\032z=H-\277\360\226\035qw\244\270(\004D\004\241\023\062\064\026\226\376\321\067\274\370\376?"... wr_buf = "\026\003\003\000E\002\000\000A\003\003OHu\016\240\363=\252\356\260#\221\a\310ò&\237\000:FɆ\351DOWNGRD\001\000\300\060\000\000\031\377\001\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\v\000\004\003\000\001\002\000#\000\000\000\027\000\000\026\003\003\020\006\v\000\020\002\000\017\377\000\005x0\202\005t0\202\004\\\240\003\002\001\002\002\022\004\062_\v\313\031\021 \240[\376N\227\346\310\004e\r0\r\006\t*\206H\206\367\r\001\001\v\005\000\060\062\061\v0\t\006\003U\004\006\023\002US1\026\060\024\006\003U\004\n\023\rLet's Encrypt1\v0\t\006\003U\004\003\023\002R30\036\027\r22070519555"... rd = {buf = 0x7ffd526c5a00 "\026\003\003", pos = 150, used = 150, size = 65536} wr = {buf = 0x7ffd526d5a00 "\026\003\003", pos = 0, used = 4096, size = 65536} tls_c = 0x7fb7574429a8 enc_rd_buf = 0x0 n = 0 flush_flags = 1 err_src = 0x7fb76612c9b0 "TLS read:" ip_buf = "172.16.51.200", '\000' <repeats 50 times> x = 0 tls_dbg = 0 __func__ = "tls_h_read_f" #19 0x000055b3daf819f3 in tcp_read_headers (c=0x7fb7576db4e8, read_flags=0x7ffd526e5dac) at core/tcp_read.c:441 bytes = 4 remaining = 0 p = 0x7fb75736b870 "2" r = 0x7fb7576db610 mc = 32695 body_len = 22326 mfline = 0x7fb755b9dadd <futex_release+29> "\211E\374\203}\374\002\017\224\300\017\266\300H\205\300t6H\213E\350H\203\354\bj" mtransid = {s = 0x55b3db16d884 "", len = 1439304448} __func__ = "tcp_read_headers" #20 0x000055b3daf8ac9d in tcp_read_req (con=0x7fb7576db4e8, bytes_read=0x7ffd526e5da8, read_flags=0x7ffd526e5dac) at core/tcp_read.c:1469 bytes = -1 total_bytes = 0 resp = 1 size = 154618822664 req = 0x7fb7576db610 dst = {send_sock = 0x1, to = {s = {sa_family = 2816, sa_data = "\312U\267\177\000\000\320\\nR\375\177\000"}, sin = {sin_family = 2816, sin_port = 21962, sin_addr = {s_addr = 32695}, sin_zero = "\320\\nR\375\177\000"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 2816, sin6_port = 21962, sin6_flowinfo = 32695, sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = "\320\\nR\375\177\000\000\030\000\000\000\000\000\000", __u6_addr16 = {23760, 21102, 32765, 0, 24, 0, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {1382964432, 32765, 24, 0}}}, sin6_scope_id = 1382964400}, sas = {ss_family = 2816, __ss_padding = "\312U\267\177\000\000\320\\nR\375\177\000\000\030\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\260\\nR\001\000\000\000\000\v\312U\267\177\000\000\260\\nR\375\177\000\000\335ڹU\267\177\000\000\204\330\026۳U\000\000\000\v\312U\267\177\000\000\002\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\002\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\360\\nR\375\177\000\000!\177\272U\267\177\000\000\360]nR\375\177\000\000\024]nR\375\177\000", __ss_align = 17179869204}}, id = -619259776, send_flags = {f = 21939, blst_imask = 0}, proto = 110 'n', proto_pad0 = -11 '\365', proto_pad1 = 28435} c = 0 '\000' ret = 1438243549 __func__ = "tcp_read_req" #21 0x000055b3daf9072c in handle_io (fm=0x7fb766755bb8, events=1, idx=-1) at core/tcp_read.c:1780 ret = 8 n = 8 read_flags = RD_CONN_SHORT_READ con = 0x7fb7576db4e8 s = 12 resp = 140425703179696 t = 1467216201 ee = 0x0 __func__ = "handle_io" #22 0x000055b3daf7bd70 in io_wait_loop_epoll (h=0x55b3db270960 <io_w>, t=2, repeat=0) at core/io_wait.h:1070 n = 1 r = 0 fm = 0x7fb766755bb8 revents = 1 __func__ = "io_wait_loop_epoll" #23 0x000055b3daf93760 in tcp_receive_loop (unix_sock=36) at core/tcp_read.c:1976 __func__ = "tcp_receive_loop" #24 0x000055b3daf6fdde in tcp_init_children (woneinit=0x7ffd526e6198) at core/tcp_main.c:5236 r = 0 i = 7 reader_fd_1 = 36 pid = 0 si_desc = "tcp receiver (generic)\000\000\356\376\357ڳU\000\000panR\375\177\000\000\036\350\371\332\000\000\000\000\070\n\037f\000\000\000\000\313\307\025۳U\000\000\241\000nR\375\177\000\000\fj\f۳U\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000ز\277U\267\177\000\000\036\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\020\316\363U\001\000\000\000`anR\375\177\000\000\036l\f۳U\000" si = 0x0 __func__ = "tcp_init_children" #25 0x000055b3dacbe65c in main_loop () at main.c:1851 i = 4 pid = 7714 si = 0x0 si_desc = "udp receiver child=3 sock=127.0.0.1:5050\000\060\066\060\000\000\000\000\003\000\000\000\036\000\000\000\000/a\230\356U\261\264X\307\036۳U\000\000\210\360\020۳U\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000s\\\022۳U\000\000\036\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\260\305'h\267\177\000\000\060cnR\375\177\000\000zI\347ڳU\000" nrprocs = 4 woneinit = 1 __func__ = "main_loop" #26 0x000055b3dacc95b0 in main (argc=11, argv=0x7ffd526e68a8) at main.c:3085 cfg_stream = 0x55b3dc09c380 c = -1 r = 0 tmp = 0x7ffd526e7e37 "" tmp_len = 0 port = 0 proto = 0 ahost = 0x0 aport = 0 options = 0x55b3db112278 ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:x:X:Y:" ret = -1 seed = 1456913526 rfd = 4 debug_save = 0 debug_flag = 0 dont_fork_cnt = 0 n_lst = 0x7fb768491cee <_dl_runtime_resolve_xsave+142> p = 0x7ffd526e68a8 "\334}nR\375\177" st = {st_dev = 25, st_ino = 1712, st_nlink = 2, st_mode = 16892, st_uid = 9002, st_gid = 9002, __pad0 = 0, st_rdev = 0, st_size = 40, st_blksize = 4096, st_blocks = 0, st_atim = {tv_sec = 1659341338, tv_nsec = 499520451}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 1659341338, tv_nsec = 499520451}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 1659341338, tv_nsec = 499520451}, __glibc_reserved = {0, 0, 0}} tbuf = '\000' <repeats 64 times>, "\377\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\377", '\000' <repeats 18 times>, "\377", '\000' <repeats 19 times>, "`", '\000' <repeats 15 times>, "\001", '\000' <repeats 145 times>... option_index = 0 long_options = {{name = 0x55b3db1146b6 "help", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 104}, {name = 0x55b3db10f521 "version", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 118}, {name = 0x55b3db1146bb "alias", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1024}, {name = 0x55b3db1146c1 "subst", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1025}, {name = 0x55b3db1146c7 "substdef", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1026}, {name = 0x55b3db1146d0 "substdefs", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1027}, {name = 0x55b3db1146da "server-id", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1028}, {name = 0x55b3db1146e4 "loadmodule", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1029}, {name = 0x55b3db1146ef "modparam", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1030}, {name = 0x55b3db1146f8 "log-engine", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1031}, {name = 0x55b3db114703 "debug", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1032}, {name = 0x55b3db114709 "cfg-print", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 1033}, {name = 0x55b3db114713 "atexit", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1034}, {name = 0x55b3db11471a "all-errors", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 1035}, {name = 0x0, has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 0}} __func__ = "main" (gdb) info locals tid = <optimized out> ret = 0 pd = 0x7fb76815b740 old_mask = {__val = {523986010119, 910533066753, 1, 140425395047168, 94230980435360, 0, 5677797456, 140425395047168, 140725986283600, 140425393986269, 94230963279192, 140425395047168, 94230963279402, 7970739754, 140725986283664, 140425394028321}} ret = <optimized out> pd = <optimized out> old_mask = <optimized out> ret = <optimized out> tid = <optimized out> ret = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> __arg3 = <optimized out> __arg2 = <optimized out> __arg1 = <optimized out> _a3 = <optimized out> _a2 = <optimized out> _a1 = <optimized out> __futex = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> __arg3 = <optimized out> __arg2 = <optimized out> __arg1 = <optimized out> _a3 = <optimized out> _a2 = <optimized out> _a1 = <optimized out> __futex = <optimized out> __private = <optimized out> __oldval = <optimized out> result = <optimized out> (gdb) list 39 in ./nptl/pthread_kill.cq ``` #### Log Messages  ``` Aug 1 12:21:45 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25442]: INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not initialized Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 kamailio: INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:74]: sctp_core_check_support(): SCTP API not enabled - if you want to use it, load sctp module Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 kamailio: INFO: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:5080]: init_tcp(): using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:399]: mod_init(): use OpenSSL version: 30000020 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:401]: mod_init(): With ECDH-Support! Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:404]: mod_init(): With Diffie Hellman Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: auth [auth_mod.c:345]: mod_init(): qop set, but nonce-count (nonce_count) support disabled Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:52]: ob_load_api(): unable to import bind_ob - maybe module is not loaded Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:188]: mod_init(): outbound module not available Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: db_text [dbt_lib.c:146]: dbt_cache_get_db(): using database at: /etc/kamailio/dbtext Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: WARNING: tls [tls_init.c:804]: tls_h_mod_init_f(): tls: openssl bug #1491 (crash/mem leaks on low memory) workaround disabled Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: <core> [main.c:3062]: main(): processes (at least): 30 - shm size: 134217728 - pkg size: 33554432 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:154]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 for fd 9 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:207]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 on fd 9 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:154]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 for fd 10 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:207]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 on fd 10 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:154]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 for fd 11 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:207]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 on fd 11 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:328]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: tls_method=20 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:340]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: certificate='/etc/kamailio/livecert/fullchain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:347]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: ca_list='/etc/kamailio/livecert/chain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:354]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: ca_path='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:361]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: crl='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:364]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: require_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:372]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: cipher_list='AES256-SHA' Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:379]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: private_key='/etc/kamailio/livecert/privkey.pem' Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:382]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:386]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_depth=9 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:389]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_client=0 Aug 1 12:21:47 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:1144]: ksr_tls_fix_domain(): registered server_name callback handler for socket [:0], server_name='<default>' ... Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:750]: set_verification(): TLSs<default>: No client certificate required and no checks performed Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:328]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: tls_method=18 Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:340]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: certificate='/etc/kamailio/livecert/fullchain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:347]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: ca_list='/etc/kamailio/livecert/chain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:354]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: ca_path='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:361]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: crl='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:364]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: require_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:372]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: cipher_list='ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384' Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:379]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: private_key='/etc/kamailio/livecert/privkey.pem' Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:382]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:386]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_depth=9 Aug 1 12:21:49 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:389]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_client=0 Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:753]: set_verification(): TLSc<default>: Server MAY present invalid certificate Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:328]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: tls_method=22 Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:340]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: certificate='/etc/kamailio/livecert/fullchain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:347]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: ca_list='/etc/kamailio/livecert/chain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:354]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: ca_path='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:361]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: crl='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:364]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: require_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:372]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: cipher_list='ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384' Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:379]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: private_key='/etc/kamailio/livecert/privkey.pem' Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:382]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:386]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_depth=9 Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:389]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_client=0 Aug 1 12:21:50 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:1144]: ksr_tls_fix_domain(): registered server_name callback handler for socket [172.16.51.200:5067], server_name='test2.test.com' ... Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:750]: set_verification(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: No client certificate required and no checks performed Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:328]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: tls_method=22 Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:340]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: certificate='/etc/kamailio/livecert/fullchain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:347]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: ca_list='/etc/kamailio/livecert/chain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:354]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: ca_path='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:361]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: crl='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:364]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: require_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:372]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: cipher_list='ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384' Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:379]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: private_key='/etc/kamailio/livecert/privkey.pem' Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:382]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:386]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_depth=9 Aug 1 12:21:51 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:389]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_client=0 Aug 1 12:21:52 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:1144]: ksr_tls_fix_domain(): registered server_name callback handler for socket [172.16.51.200:5067], server_name='test.test.com' ... Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:750]: set_verification(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: No client certificate required and no checks performed Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:328]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: tls_method=22 Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:340]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: certificate='/etc/kamailio/livecert/fullchain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:347]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: ca_list='/etc/kamailio/livecert/chain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:354]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: ca_path='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:361]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: crl='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:364]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: require_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:372]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: cipher_list='ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384' Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:379]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: private_key='/etc/kamailio/livecert/privkey.pem' Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:382]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:386]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_depth=9 Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:389]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_client=0 Aug 1 12:21:53 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:1144]: ksr_tls_fix_domain(): registered server_name callback handler for socket [172.16.51.200:5067], server_name='test3.test.com' ... Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:750]: set_verification(): TLSs<172.16.51.200:5067>: No client certificate required and no checks performed Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:328]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: tls_method=18 Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:340]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: certificate='/etc/kamailio/livecert/fullchain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:347]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: ca_list='/etc/kamailio/livecert/chain.pem' Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:354]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: ca_path='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:361]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: crl='(null)' Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:364]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: require_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:372]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: cipher_list='ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384' Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:379]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: private_key='/etc/kamailio/livecert/privkey.pem' Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:382]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_certificate=0 Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:386]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_depth=9 Aug 1 12:21:54 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:389]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: verify_client=0 Aug 1 12:21:56 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:753]: set_verification(): TLSc<172.16.51.200:5067>: Server MAY present invalid certificate Aug 1 12:21:56 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25504]: INFO: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2929]: rtpp_test(): rtpengine instance <udp:127.0.0.1:2223> found, support for it enabled Aug 1 12:21:56 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25520]: INFO: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_sock.c:443]: jsonrpc_dgram_process(): a new child 0/25520 Aug 1 12:21:56 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25523]: INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:213]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method (config) Aug 1 12:21:57 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25525]: ERROR: <script>: 758:No dispatcher sets up yet Aug 1 12:21:57 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25525]: ERROR: <script>: 758:No dispatcher sets up yet Aug 1 12:21:57 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25525]: WARNING: <script>: 548:[LOCATION] Location not found rc: -1 sip:lPBKm2s70BBd6u@sipuat.voicesimplified.com;transport=TLS Aug 1 12:21:57 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25525]: ERROR: <script>: 758:No dispatcher sets up yet Aug 1 12:21:59 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25532]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4672]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 185.29.208.21:5061 failed (timeout) Aug 1 12:22:06 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25508]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:06 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25510]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:06 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25511]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:06 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25508]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:06 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25504]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:06 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25505]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:06 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25504]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:07 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25506]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:07 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25505]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:07 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25506]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:07 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25507]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:07 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25506]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:22:07 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25506]: NOTICE: <script>: Destination up: sip:redacted Aug 1 12:24:48 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25525]: INFO: <script>: R-URI Alias Found and processed Aug 1 12:24:48 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25510]: INFO: <script>: R-URI Alias Found and processed Aug 1 12:26:06 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25513]: WARNING: tm [t_reply.c:1677]: t_retransmit_reply(): no resolved dst to retransmit Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25526]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f7a8a860d80), called from tls: tls_init.c: ser_free(323), first free tls: tls_init.c: ser_free(323) - ignoring Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25532]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 36 Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:776]: handle_sigs(): child process 25526 exited by a signal 11 Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:779]: handle_sigs(): core was generated Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25502]: INFO: <core> [main.c:801]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25532]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25513]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25531]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25522]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25521]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25525]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25520]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25514]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25529]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25511]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25515]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25509]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25519]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25516]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25517]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25512]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25510]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25506]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25504]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25524]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25518]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25523]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25508]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25528]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25530]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25505]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25507]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received Aug 1 12:27:17 kam-test01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25527]: INFO: <core> [main.c:856]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received ``` ### Additional Information Tested against kamailio 5.6 and devel branches with a distclean between builds ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS Release: 22.04 Codename: jammy Linux kam-test01 5.15.0-1014-azure #17-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 23 19:04:16 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3205 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3205(a)github.com>

2 months, 2 weeks

[kamailio/kamailio] kazoo: 'amqp_set_initialize_ssl_library' is deprecated (Issue #3466)

by sergey-safarov

From the build log ``` CC (gcc) [M kazoo.so] kazoo.o CC (gcc) [M kazoo.so] kz_amqp.o kz_amqp.c: In function 'kz_amqp_connection_open_ssl': kz_amqp.c:857:17: warning: 'amqp_set_initialize_ssl_library' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] 857 | amqp_set_initialize_ssl_library(1); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from kz_amqp.c:37: /usr/include/rabbitmq-c/ssl_socket.h:233:16: note: declared here 233 | void AMQP_CALL amqp_set_initialize_ssl_library(amqp_boolean_t do_initialize); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CC (gcc) [M kazoo.so] kz_fixup.o CC (gcc) [M kazoo.so] kz_hash.o ``` Functions description in the header file https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/blob/v0.13.0/include/rabbitmq-c/ssl_so… ``` /** * Sets whether rabbitmq-c will initialize OpenSSL. * * \deprecated Since v0.13.0 this is a no-op. OpenSSL automatically manages * library initialization and uninitialization. * * OpenSSL requires a one-time initialization across a whole program, this sets * whether or not rabbitmq-c will initialize the SSL library when the first call * to amqp_ssl_socket_new() is made. You should call this function with * do_init = 0 if the underlying SSL library is initialized somewhere else * the program. * * Failing to initialize or double initialization of the SSL library will * result in undefined behavior * * By default rabbitmq-c will initialize the underlying SSL library. * * NOTE: calling this function after the first socket has been opened with * amqp_open_socket() will not have any effect. * * \param [in] do_initialize If 0 rabbitmq-c will not initialize the SSL * library, otherwise rabbitmq-c will initialize the * SSL library * * \since v0.4.0 */ ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3466 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3466(a)github.com>

3 months, 2 weeks

[kamailio/kamailio] TM crash when relaying reply, in context of unreachable rtpengine (Issue #3297)

by Alex Balashov

When relaying this `200 OK` repeatedly with calls to `rtpengine_answer()` failing because all RTPEngines in a set are unreachable... ``` Dec 8 06:24:38 gw kamailio[4823]: ERROR: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2960]: select_rtpp_node(): rtpengine failed to select new for calllen=36 callid=8279a4ea-151e-48de-a23c-5840104126de ``` ``` SIP/2.0 200 OK v:SIP/2.0/UDP 10.150.20.20;branch=z9hG4bK03e.e4da444e627bb575ef4f46151729a1fa.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 10.151.20.108;received=10.151.20.108;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKKQyrBKpp04X0K Record-Route:<sip:10.150.20.20;lr;ftag=emHm2apy95jFe;rtp_relay=1;rtp_group=0> f:"14045551212"<sip:14045551212@10.151.20.108>;tag=emHm2apy95jFe t:<sip:16782001111@internal.evaristesys.com>;tag=tHQt0rDcF7UHK i:8279a4ea-151e-48de-a23c-5840104126de CSeq:60686471 INVITE m:<sip:16782001111@10.160.10.55:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent:VoiceAppServer Allow:INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,INFO,UPDATE,REFER,NOTIFY k:path,replaces u:talk,hold,conference,refer c:application/sdp Content-Disposition:session l:257 v=0 o=DM 1670428117 1670428118 IN IP4 10.160.10.55 s=DM c=IN IP4 10.160.10.55 t=0 0 m=audio 52418 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 a=rtcp:52419 IN IP4 10.160.10.55 ``` Repeat INVITEs eventually result in a crash. This backtrace is taken from a different server but identical scenario: ``` #0 t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7f4aee56ba80, new_code=200, branch=0, should_store=0x7ffd8b8bbba0, should_relay=0x7ffd8b8bbba4, cancel_data=0x7ffd8b8bbe40, reply=0x7f4afe40df70) at t_reply.c:1285 1285 && !(inv_through && Trans->uac[branch].last_received<300)) { Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.12-1.192.el6.x86_64 jansson-2.11-1.el6.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.4-5.el6.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.10.3-57.el6.x86_64 libcom_err-1.41.12-22.el6.x86_64 libev-4.03-3.el6.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-7.el6.x86_64 libunistring-0.9.3-5.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.20-1.el6_7.2.x86_64 zlib-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64 (gdb) where #0 t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7f4aee56ba80, new_code=200, branch=0, should_store=0x7ffd8b8bbba0, should_relay=0x7ffd8b8bbba4, cancel_data=0x7ffd8b8bbe40, reply=0x7f4afe40df70) at t_reply.c:1285 #1 0x00007f4afd73ab7d in relay_reply (t=0x7f4aee56ba80, p_msg=0x7f4afe40df70, branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_data=0x7ffd8b8bbe40, do_put_on_wait=1) at t_reply.c:1821 #2 0x00007f4afd740c38 in reply_received (p_msg=0x7f4afe40df70) at t_reply.c:2558 #3 0x00000000004b5d6a in do_forward_reply (msg=0x7f4afe40df70, mode=0) at core/forward.c:747 #4 0x00000000004b78c9 in forward_reply (msg=0x7f4afe40df70) at core/forward.c:852 #5 0x000000000054982b in receive_msg ( buf=0xb27700 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nv:SIP/2.0/UDP xxx;branch=z9hG4bK9915.dcfe6d03cb21e6c94a6705adb095c566.0,SIP/2.0/UDP xxx;received=xxx;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKZmZp0NZv3FvQB\r\nRecord-Rout"..., len=984, rcv_info=0x7ffd8b8bc6c0) at core/receive.c:434 #6 0x00000000006658ca in udp_rcv_loop () at core/udp_server.c:541 #7 0x000000000042500f in main_loop () at main.c:1655 #8 0x000000000042c5bb in main (argc=11, argv=0x7ffd8b8bcc88) at main.c:2696 ``` Looks like in the crash frame, `Trans->uac` is `NULL`: ``` (gdb) frame 0 #0 t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7f4aee56ba80, new_code=200, branch=0, should_store=0x7ffd8b8bbba0, should_relay=0x7ffd8b8bbba4, cancel_data=0x7ffd8b8bbe40, reply=0x7f4afe40df70) at t_reply.c:1285 1285 && !(inv_through && Trans->uac[branch].last_received<300)) { (gdb) print Trans->uac $1 = (struct ua_client *) 0x0 ``` I have seen this crash from time to time, though it is infrequent. It always seems to occur when there are problems reaching RTPEngine in a timely fashion. This is on Kamailio 5.2.4:de9a03, which I know has long fallen off the back of the maintenance train. However, line 1386 of `t_reply.c` in `master:HEAD` shows that the code is no different now: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/tm/t_reply.c#L… Of course, it's possible that something upstream has changed so as to prevent this state. Otherwise, I suppose a null pointer safety check for `Trans->uac` is recommended. I'd be happy to submit a patch, just wasn't sure if the feeling was more that this should be resolved higher up the call stack. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3297 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3297(a)github.com>

4 months

[kamailio/kamailio] t_uac_send parser does not like exclamation or other non alphabetic characters in Contact header (Issue #3682)

by xaled1

Hi there is an issue with the SIP parser for the t_uac_send function https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_uac_send If I call this function for example: t_uac_send("INVITE", "sip:test@123.123.123.123:5060", "", "" ,"Content-Type: text/plain\r\nContact: <sip:85951b3d-096c-95d6-5f05-4f38095aca9f@172.17.64.120:5060;transport=tcp>;+u.sip!devicename.ccm.cisco.com=\"SEP5486BC7F2BBC\"", "Testbody") Then the resulting request is broken - it's probably due to a character (exclamation mark?) in the Contact header.... I tested it with a call from kemi, but it probably also occurs when you run it with a normal kamailio -script tests -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3682 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3682(a)github.com>

6 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Dialog DMQ sync: Timer needs fixing, firing on wrong node! (Issue #3656)

by Benoît Panizzon

Situation: Two Kamailio nodes syncing dialog profiles via DMQ Observation: When a dialog timeout is encountered, about half of the time, the timeout is triggered on the peer node not handling the dialog preventing the call to be correctly terminated and also leaving entries in the dialog database which never get deleted. https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.7.x/modules/dialog.html#dialog.p.enable… Makes clear, that only the node which is handling the dialog in question, can make changes not related to the dialog profiles. So when a dialog times out, it is this node which has to trigger the timeout, not any other one. When looking at the source code, it is clear, that the 'lifetime' is transmitted via DMQ dialog message to the peer nodes, which in turn arm a timer. So it is obvious, this time will trigger, sometimes before the instance handling the dialog itself triggers that timer. With some assistance of @oej I found a way to alter the JSON payload to extend the lifetime on the peer nodes: ``` route[DMQ_CAPTURE] { if(is_method("KDMQ")) { if(has_body("application/json") && $fU == 'dialog') { if (jansson_get("lifetime", $rb, "$var(lifetime)")) { $var(new_lifetime) = $var(lifetime) + 60; # Add 60 seconds on DMQ peer to make sure it expires AFTER main node. $var(newrb) = $rb; jansson_set("integer", "lifetime", $var(new_lifetime), "$var(newrb)"); set_body("$var(newrb)","application/json"); msg_apply_changes(); } } dmq_handle_message(); exit; } } ``` Testing with this config fixed the issue of the timeout firing on a peer node instead of the node handling the dialog. Issue is present in 5.5, 5.6 and after looking at the code, I assume also on 5.7 -Benoît -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3656 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3656(a)github.com>

6 months, 1 week

[kamailio/kamailio] Debian package build fails for Kamailio 5.7.4 (Issue #3722)

by Alexander Bakker

### Description The Debian package build fails for Kamailio 5.7.4 because it can't find static libssl. This happens because ``LIBSSL_STATIC_SRCPATH`` is set to the wrong location in the rules file. ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction 1. Run ``ln -s pkg/kamailio/deb/bookworm debian`` 2. Run ``make deb`` #### Output ``` gcc -shared -g -m64 -Wl,-O2 -Wl,-E -Wl,-z,relro -pthread -rdynamic "-ldl" -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions tls_bio.o tls_cfg.o tls_config.o tls_ct_wrq.o tls_domain.o tls_dump_vf.o tls_init.o tls_locking.o tls_map.o tls_rand.o tls_rpc.o tls_select.o tls_server.o tls_util.o tls_verify.o tlsa_mod.o -lm /usr/lib64/libssl.a /usr/lib64/libcrypto.a -o tlsa.so /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libssl.a: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libcrypto.a: No such file or directory collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[5]: *** [../../Makefile.rules:191: tlsa.so] Error 1 ``` ### Possible Solutions An extremely hacky workaround is to patch the rules file to point ``LIBSSL_STATIC_SRCPATH`` to the right location: ``` sed -i -e "/LIBSSL_STATIC_SRCPATH/a export\\ LIBSSL_STATIC_SRCPATH=\\/usr\\/lib\\/$(uname -m)-linux-gnu" pkg/kamailio/deb/bookworm/rules ``` ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.7.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) Release: 12 Codename: bookworm ``` ``` Linux 6.5.0-14-generic #14-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Nov 14 14:59:49 UTC 2023 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3722 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3722(a)github.com>

6 months, 2 weeks

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev March 2024