### Description
While a INVITE is been processed the CANCEL of that transaction is been processed in other process almost at the same time
### Troubleshooting
#### Reproduction
Quite difficult to reproduce I would say
#### Debugging Data
```
Reading symbols from /usr/sbin/kamailio...
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3/9bd8ad0900c980149b00579cce26035c9cb118.debug...
warning: Can't open file /dev/zero (deleted) during file-backed mapping note processing
[New LWP 4136750]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /run/kamailio/kamailio.proxy.pid -f /etc/kamailio/proxy/k'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 atomic_dec_and_test_int (var=0x20) at ../../core/parser/../mem/../atomic/atomic_x86.h:222
222 ../../core/parser/../mem/../atomic/atomic_x86.h: No such file or directory.
(gdb) backtrace
#0 atomic_dec_and_test_int (var=0x20) at ../../core/parser/../mem/../atomic/atomic_x86.h:222
0000001 t_unref (p_msg=<optimized out>) at t_lookup.c:1514
#2 0x000055eee962d69b in exec_post_script_cb (msg=msg@entry=0x7f7e265822c8, type=type@entry=REQUEST_CB_TYPE)
at core/script_cb.c:182
0000003 0x000055eee95dfcbe in receive_msg (
buf=buf@entry=0x55eee9a00740 <buf> "INVITE sip:...@fake.dom:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0\r\nRecord-
Route: <sip:X.X.X.X;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=1E7F0816-6299BCF10003883E-7FFFF700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:Y.Y.Y.Y:5060>\r
\nRe"..., len=<optimized out>, rcv_info=rcv_info@entry=0x7ffc96d12af0) at core/receive.c:520
#4 0x000055eee96d4c40 in udp_rcv_loop () at core/udp_server.c:543
#5 0x000055eee94db634 in main_loop () at main.c:1730
#6 0x000055eee94d2d2c in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.c:3053
```
#### Log Messages
Notice that both messages came in the same second ( IPs and numbers have been changed )
```
Jun 3 09:49:05 sipwise2-prx03a proxy[4136750]: NOTICE: DEFAULT_ROUTE <script>: New request on proxy - M=INVITE R=«sip:+49......@X.X.X.X
:5060;transport=udp» F=«sip:+49...@fake.dom» T=«sip:+49...@Y.Y.Y.Z» IP=«Y.Y.Y.Z»:«5060» («Y.Y.Y.Y»:«5060»)
ID=«31668-TN-030322e6-0904f8ba1(a)fake.xn--dom_b2b-1-era UA='Cirpack/v4.88 (gw_sip)' DESTIP=«Y.Y.Y.G»:«5062»
```
```
Jun 3 09:49:05 sipwise2-prx03a proxy[4136755]: NOTICE: DEFAULT_ROUTE <script>: New request on proxy - M=CANCEL R=«sip:+49...@X.X.X.X
:5060;transport=udp» F=«sip:+49...@fake.dom» T=«sip:+49...@Y.Y.Y.Z» IP=«Y.Y.Y.Y»:«5060» («Y.Y.Y.Y»:«5060
») ID=«31668-TN-030322e6-0904f8ba1(a)fake.xn--dom_b2b-1-era UA='<null>' DESTIP=«Z.Z.Z.Z»:«5062»
Jun 3 09:49:05 sipwise2-prx03a proxy[4136755]: NOTICE: DEFAULT_ROUTE <script>: Sending reply S=100 Trying M=CANCEL fs='«Z.Z.Z.Z»:«5062»' du
='«Y.Y.Y.Y»:«5060»' - R=«sip:+49...@X.X.X.X:5060;transport=udp» ID=«31668-TN-030322e6-0904f8ba1(a)fake.xn--dom_b2b-1-era UA='<n
ull>'
```
### Additional Information
This is the Sipwise flavor 5.5.1-1+0~mr9.5.3.2
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3156
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3156(a)github.com>
<!--
Kamailio Project uses GitHub Issues only for bugs in the code or feature requests. Please use this template only for bug reports.
If you have questions about using Kamailio or related to its configuration file, ask on sr-users mailing list:
* http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
If you have questions about developing extensions to Kamailio or its existing C code, ask on sr-dev mailing list:
* http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Please try to fill this template as much as possible for any issue. It helps the developers to troubleshoot the issue.
If there is no content to be filled in a section, the entire section can be removed.
You can delete the comments from the template sections when filling.
You can delete next line and everything above before submitting (it is a comment).
-->
### Description
Relevant modules and parameters in configuration:
```
loadmodule "presence.so"
loadmodule "dialog.so"
loadmodule "presence_xml.so"
loadmodule "pua.so"
loadmodule "presence_dialoginfo.so"
loadmodule "pua_dialoginfo.so"
modparam("dialog", "db_mode", 1)
modparam("presence", "subs_db_mode", 2)
modparam("presence", "db_table_lock_type", 0)
modparam("pua", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("pua", "db_table_lock_write", 0)
```
Using 2 UDP receiver processes.
User1 is watching (has` SUBSCRIBE`d to) User2, which is called by User3 (call1). User2 doesn't answer, phone is ringing. User1 now also calls User2 (call2), but we don't support receiving a second call so, for this `INVITE`, after 183, almost immediately, a 486 "Busy Here" message is sent and the call is cancelled (call2 finished). The 183 reply generates an "**early**" state on the UDP1 process, while 486 goes to "**terminated**" on the UDP2 process. The `PUBLISH` messages are processed almost concomitantly. The problem is that "**early**" state arrives to the subscriber (User1) after the "**terminated**" one (seen with `sngrep`) so the phone button keeps blinking for a while (... and the state cannot be changed by other call while the "**early**" event is still in the `presentity` table of the database).
I suspect a concurrency problem since I didn't reproduce it with only one UDP receiver process. Even if the "**terminated**" lifetime is much smaller (11s vs minutes), I strongly believe it is still there when the "**early**" state is written. Does the "**early**" event checks the database/memory for a "**terminated**" event for the same call ID? Is it because of the missing locks maybe (`db_table_lock_type`, `db_table_lock_write`) ?
### Troubleshooting
#### Reproduction
Using 2 UDP receiver processes.
User1 is watching (has `SUBSCRIBE`d to) User2, which is called by User3 (call1). User2 doesn't answer, phone is ringing. User1 now also calls User2 (call2), but we don't support receiving a second call so, for this `INVITE`, after 183, almost immediately, a 486 "Busy Here" message is sent and the call is cancelled (call2 finished).
I would not say that it is systematic, but easy enough to reproduce.
#### Debugging Data
<!--
If you got a core dump, use gdb to extract troubleshooting data - full backtrace,
local variables and the list of the code at the issue location.
gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile
bt full
info locals
list
If you are familiar with gdb, feel free to attach more of what you consider to
be relevant.
-->
#### Log Messages
<!--
Check the syslog file and if there are relevant log messages printed by Kamailio, add them next, or attach to issue, or provide a link to download them (e.g., to a pastebin site).
-->
#### SIP Traffic
<!--
If the issue is exposed by processing specific SIP messages, grab them with ngrep or save in a pcap file, then add them next, or attach to issue, or provide a link to download them (e.g., to a pastebin site).
-->
```
(paste your sip traffic here)
```
### Possible Solutions
<!--
If you found a solution or workaround for the issue, describe it. Ideally, provide a pull request with a fix.
-->
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
```
version: kamailio 5.5.4 (x86_64/linux)
flags: , EXTRA_DEBUGUSE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: unknown
compiled with gcc 8.3.0
```
* **Operating System**:
Docker image around
```
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
Release: 10
Codename: buster
(paste your output here)
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3192
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3192(a)github.com>
I’ve finally got confirmation that the SIP ALPN identifier is registered.
https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values/tls-extensiontype…
For Kamailio, this could assist when we multiplex multiple protocols on the same port, like we do for HTTPs and SIP/TLS many times.
ALPN Is part of the TLS handshake, indicating what protocol comes after TLS is done.
For it to help, both phones and servers needs to support it. I do think it would be helpful.
Cheers,
/O
<!-- Kamailio Pull Request Template -->
<!--
IMPORTANT:
- for detailed contributing guidelines, read:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
- pull requests must be done to master branch, unless they are backports
of fixes from master branch to a stable branch
- backports to stable branches must be done with 'git cherry-pick -x ...'
- code is contributed under BSD for core and main components (tm, sl, auth, tls)
- code is contributed GPLv2 or a compatible license for the other components
- GPL code is contributed with OpenSSL licensing exception
-->
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick all the checkboxes that apply -->
<!-- All points should be verified, otherwise, read the CONTRIBUTING guidelines from above-->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask on sr-dev mailing list -->
- [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [x ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick the checkboxes that apply -->
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [x ] Tested changes locally
- [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number)
#### Description
<!-- Describe your changes in detail -->
Will you accept this? I find this extremely useful for troubleshooting. If accepted I'd like to add to most of the routing blocks.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3228
-- Commit Summary --
* Add More Logging Option
-- File Changes --
M etc/kamailio.cfg (4)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3228.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3228.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3228
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3228(a)github.com>