sr-dev April 2022

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

17 participants
284 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] ims_usrloc_pcscf module loads registration records from the db twice (#2809)

by ErhanOnur

### Description ims_registrar_pcscf module create a process with rank 1 (PROC_SIPINIT) if reginfo flag is open.. This is wrong because it is written that PROC_SIPINIT rank should be given only to the first worker process. ``` #define PROC_SIPINIT 1 /**< First (special) SIP worker - some modules do special processing in this child, like loading db data */ ``` This leads to a problem. ims_usrloc_pcscf loads registration records from the db twice. The codes are demonstrated below. Similar old issue exists here for another module: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/975 ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  Here are fork operations and their ranks: ``` [root@n5gc-ims-dev src]# cat /usr/src/erhan5.log | grep init_mod_child | grep ims_usrloc_pcscf 0(10662) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 0 rank -127: ims_usrloc_pcscf [main] 1(10671) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 1 rank 1: ims_usrloc_pcscf [udp receiver child=0 sock=10.10.12.101:5060 (172.30.65.101:5060)] 3(10673) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 3 rank 3: ims_usrloc_pcscf [udp receiver child=2 sock=10.10.12.101:5060 (172.30.65.101:5060)] 2(10672) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 2 rank 2: ims_usrloc_pcscf [udp receiver child=1 sock=10.10.12.101:5060 (172.30.65.101:5060)] 5(10675) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 5 rank -1: ims_usrloc_pcscf [slow timer] 0(10662) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 0 rank 0: ims_usrloc_pcscf [main] 6(10679) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 6 rank -1: ims_usrloc_pcscf [timer] 4(10674) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 4 rank 4: ims_usrloc_pcscf [udp receiver child=3 sock=10.10.12.101:5060 (172.30.65.101:5060)] 7(10680) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 7 rank -1: ims_usrloc_pcscf [secondary timer] 8(10686) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 8 rank 1: ims_usrloc_pcscf [RegInfo Event Processor] 9(10687) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 9 rank -1: ims_usrloc_pcscf [Dialog Clean Timer] 10(10688) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 10 rank -2: ims_usrloc_pcscf [ctl handler] 11(10689) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 11 rank 5: ims_usrloc_pcscf [tcp receiver (generic) child=0] 12(10694) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 12 rank 6: ims_usrloc_pcscf [tcp receiver (generic) child=1] 13(10695) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 13 rank 7: ims_usrloc_pcscf [tcp receiver (generic) child=2] 14(10697) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 14 rank 8: ims_usrloc_pcscf [tcp receiver (generic) child=3] 15(10699) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:845]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank -4: ims_usrloc_pcscf [tcp main process] ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  In following code ims_registrar_pcscf module create a process with rank 1 (PROC_SIPINIT) : fork_process(PROC_SIPINIT, "RegInfo Event Processor", 1); ``` static int child_init(int rank) { LM_DBG("Initialization of module in child [%d] \n", rank); if ((subscribe_to_reginfo == 1) && (rank == PROC_MAIN)) { LM_DBG("Creating RegInfo Event Processor process\n"); int pid = fork_process(PROC_SIPINIT, "RegInfo Event Processor", 1); if (pid < 0) return -1; //error if (pid == 0) { if (cfg_child_init()) return -1; //error reginfo_event_process(); } } if (rank == PROC_MAIN || rank == PROC_TCP_MAIN) return 0; if (rank == 1) { /* init stats */ //TODO if parameters are modified via cfg framework do i change them? //update_stat( max_expires_stat, default_registrar_cfg.max_expires ); update_stat( max_contacts_stat, default_registrar_cfg.max_contacts ); update_stat( default_expire_stat, default_registrar_cfg.default_expires ); } /* don't do anything for main process and TCP manager process */ if (rank == PROC_MAIN || rank == PROC_TCP_MAIN) return 0; return 0; } ``` Here is how ims_usrloc_pcscf loads records from db at its child init callback function: ``` if (_rank==PROC_SIPINIT && db_mode!=DB_ONLY) { // if cache is used, populate domains from DB for( ptr=root ; ptr ; ptr=ptr->next) { LM_DBG("Preloading domain %.*s\n", ptr->name.len, ptr->name.s); if (preload_udomain(ul_dbh, ptr->d) < 0) { LM_ERR("child(%d): failed to preload domain '%.*s'\n", _rank, ptr->name.len, ZSW(ptr->name.s)); return -1; } } } ``` ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` it exists at latest version on master branch. [here](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/ims_regi… ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` CentOS 7.1 ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2809

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] [stirshaken] RCD (Rich Call Data) support in STIR/SHAKEN module (#2780)

by sergei lavrov

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] kamailio mariadb error lock table active_watcher (#2805)

by ReznikovAlexei

### Description I am using Kamailio with Mariadb module And i am get in Kamailio log some error messages: ``` "ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:122]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Table 'active_watchers' was not locked with LOCK TABLES (1100)" "ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:122]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Table 'active_watchers' was not locked with LOCK TABLES (1100)" "ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:122]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Table 'active_watchers' was not locked with LOCK TABLES (1100)" ``` After start debug log queries in Mariadb, i see queries in logfile like this: ``` 1141 Query SET autocommit=0 1141 Query LOCK TABLES presentity WRITE 1141 Query update `presentity` set `etag`='a.1620236063.17716.2514.101',`expires`=1625215189,`received_time`=1625214589,`priority`=205144189,`body`='<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n<presence xmlns:dm=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model\" xmlns:rpid=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid\" xmlns:pidfonline=\"http://www.linphone.org/xsds/pidfonline.xsd\" entity=\"sip:name_user@office-dev.com\" xmlns=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf\">\n <tuple id=\"bephbl\">\n <status>\n <basic>open</basic>\n <pidfonline:online/>\n </status>\n <contact priority=\"0.8\">sip:name_user@office-dev.com</contact>\n <timestamp>2021-07-01T17:20:41Z</timestamp>\n </tuple>\n</presence>\n' where `domain`='office-dev.com' AND `username`='name_user' AND `event`='presence' AND `etag`='a.1620236063.17716.2513.100' 1141 Query select `to_user`,`to_domain`,`from_user`,`from_domain`,`watcher_username`,`watcher_domain`,`event_id`,`from_tag`,`to_tag`,`callid`,`local_cseq`,`record_route`,`contact`,`expires`,`reason`,`socket_info`,`local_contact`,`version`,`flags`,`user_agent` from `active_watchers` where `presentity_uri`='sip:name_user@office-dev.com' AND `event`='presence' AND `status`=1 AND `contact`<>'' 1141 Query COMMIT 1141 Query SET autocommit=1 1141 Query UNLOCK TABLES ``` or this one ``` 1141 Query LOCK TABLES presentity WRITE 1141 Query insert into `presentity` (`domain`,`username`,`event`,`etag`,`sender`,`body`,`received_time`,`priority`,`expires` ) values ('dev.com','+121342','presence','a.1620236063.17716.2532.0','','<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n<presence xmlns:dm=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model\" xmlns:rpid=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid\" xmlns:pidfonline=\"http://www.linphone.org/xsds/pidfonline.xsd\" entity=\"sip:+121342@dev.com\" xmlns=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf\">\n <tuple id=\"wumhh7\">\n <status>\n <basic>open</basic>\n <pidfonline:online/>\n </status>\n <contact priority=\"0.8\">sip:+121342@dev.com</contact>\n <timestamp>2021-07-02T10:55:26Z</timestamp>\n </tuple>\n</presence>\n',1625223329,205152929,1625226929) 1141 Query select `to_user`,`to_domain`,`from_user`,`from_domain`,`watcher_username`,`watcher_domain`,`event_id`,`from_tag`,`to_tag`,`callid`,`local_cseq`,`record_route`,`contact`,`expires`,`reason`,`socket_info`,`local_contact`,`version`,`flags`,`user_agent` from `active_watchers` where `presentity_uri`='sip:+121342@dev.com' AND `event`='presence' AND `status`=1 AND `contact`<>'' 1141 Query COMMIT 1141 Query SET autocommit=1 1141 Query UNLOCK TABLES ``` This queries matches for time with reproduced errors in above kamailio log. #### Reproduction In test lab ``` MariaDB [kamailio]> LOCK TABLES presentity WRITE; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) MariaDB [kamailio]> select * from presentity; Empty set (0.00 sec) MariaDB [kamailio]> select * from active_watcher; ERROR 1100 (HY000): Table 'active_watcher' was not locked with LOCK TABLES MariaDB [kamailio]> ``` I get same error Also i am found in additional documentation from Mysql next: ``` A session that requires locks must acquire all the locks that it needs in a single LOCK TABLES statement. While the locks thus obtained are held, the session can access only the locked tables. ``` or from Mariadb docs ``` While a connection holds an explicit lock on a table, it cannot access a non-locked table. If you try, the following error will be produced: ERROR 1100 (HY000): Table 'tab_name' was not locked with LOCK TABLES ``` ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** * ``` Kamailio ver 5.4.5 or 5.6.0 ``` So, maybe need add additional lock for table active_watchers or need take out query select from space LOCK - UNLOCK for resolve this issue? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2805

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] uac: allowing sending register for uacreg using rpc command and function (#2766)

by Surendra Tiwari

### Description Right now there is no way that allows users to control sending register packet using rpc command based on l_uuid .  ### Expected behavior #### Actual observed behavior #### Debugging Data ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2766

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] cscf_get_ue_via does not return UE via (#2864)

by ErhanOnur

### Description I put a dispatcher between PCSCF and UE. When I tried to register, Pcscf's save function saved dispatcher's via IP and via port instead of UE's via IP and via port. When I checked save function of ims_registrar_pcscf module , I saw that cscf_get_ue_via function is used for that. And It gives wrong via value. Instead of giving last via , it gives the first via in the via list. Here is the function: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/lib/ims/ims_getters.c ``` /** * Looks for the UE Via in First Via header if its a request * or in the last if its a response and returns its body * @param msg - the SIP message * @returns the via of the UE */ struct via_body* cscf_get_ue_via(struct sip_msg *msg) { struct via_body *vb=0; if (msg->first_line.type==SIP_REQUEST) vb = cscf_get_first_via(msg,0); else vb = cscf_get_last_via(msg); if (!vb) return 0; if (vb->port == 0) vb->port=5060; return vb; } ``` ### Troubleshooting I corrected the code as below: ``` /** * Looks for the UE Via in Last Via header and returns its body * @param msg - the SIP message * @returns the via of the UE */ struct via_body* cscf_get_ue_via(struct sip_msg *msg) { struct via_body *vb=0; vb = cscf_get_last_via(msg); if (!vb) return 0; if (vb->port == 0) vb->port=5060; return vb; } ``` #### Reproduction Try to put a dispatcher between PCSCF and UE. save function of ims_registrar_pcscf module saves dispatcher's IP and port as UE's IP and port. #### Debugging Data ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2864

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] Presence not working with Postgresql && subs_db_mode = 3 && notifier_processes != 0 (#2739)

by kageds

### Description If I set notifier_processes = 0 then BLF (subscribe/notify) works as expected. if I set notifier_processes to anything other than 0 then the initial subscribe works fine but when the device Re-Subscribes due to expiry of the timer I see errors in the kamailio log, the subsequent susbcribe fails and BLF no longer works. ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction This issue can be easily reproduced just by setting notifier_processes to 1. #### Debugging Data  ``` ``` #### Log Messages ``` ERROR: db_postgres [km_dbase.c:480]: db_postgres_query_lock(): transaction not in progress ERROR: presence [subscribe.c:1708]: get_database_info(): querying subscription dialog INFO: presence [subscribe.c:1129]: handle_subscribe(): getting stored info ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` [11:28:02.095] TX to x.x.x.x:5060: SUBSCRIBE sip:1005@example.com;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP y.y.y.y:51761;branch=z9hG4bK271d65c640 661e;rport Contact: <sip:10004@y.y.y.y:51761> Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:x.x.x.x;lr> To: <sip:1005@example.com;transport=udp> From: <sip:10004@example.com>;tag=602c0c864ab45075 Call-ID: 181910a72dc93418 CSeq: 26762 SUBSCRIBE User-Agent: polycomVVX-VVX_400-UA/5.8.5.1256 Event: dialog Accept: application/dialog-info+xml Expires: 600 Supported: Content-Length: 0 [11:28:02.184] RX from x.x.x.x:5060: SIP/2.0 202 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP y.y.y.y:51761;branch=z9hG4bK271d65c640 661e;rport=51761;received=y.y.y.y To: <sip:1005@example.com;transport=udp>;tag=f055057275da74fa400fb8f3e0bfdfcf-718a1cd7 From: <sip:10004@example.com>;tag=602c0c864ab45075 Call-ID: 181910a72dc93418 CSeq: 26762 SUBSCRIBE Expires: 600 Contact: <sip:x.x.x.x:5060;transport=udp> Content-Length: 0 [11:28:02.1 ] RX from x.x.x.x:5060: NOTIFY sip:10004@y.y.y.y:51761 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:x.x.x.x;lr=on;ftag=f055057275da74fa400fb8f3e0bfdfcf-718a1cd7> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x;branch=z9hG4bK54.4071b642000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:10004@example.com>;tag=602c0c864ab45075 From: <sip:1005@example.com>;tag=f055057275da74fa400fb8f3e0bfdfcf-718a1cd7 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Call-ID: 181910a72dc93418 Content-Length: 266 Max-Forwards: 70 Event: dialog Contact: <sip:x.x.x.x:5060;transport=udp> Subscription-State: active;expires=600 Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml <?xml version="1.0"?> <dialog-info xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dialog-info" version="1" state="full" entity="sip:1005@example.com"> <dialog id="615293b33c62dec073e05d9421e9f48b" direction="recipient"> <state>terminated</state> </dialog> </dialog-info> [11:28:02.1 ] TX to x.x.x.x:5060: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x;branch=z9hG4bK54.4071b642000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:10004@example.com>;tag=602c0c864ab45075 From: <sip:1005@example.com>;tag=f055057275da74fa400fb8f3e0bfdfcf-718a1cd7 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Call-ID: 181910a72dc93418 Server: polycomVVX-VVX_400-UA/5.8.5.1256 Content-Length: 0 ...time...time...time... [11:37:02.190] TX to x.x.x.x:5060: SUBSCRIBE sip:x.x.x.x:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP y.y.y.y:51761;branch=z9hG4bK496e53396451225a;rport Contact: <sip:10004@y.y.y.y:51761> Max-Forwards: 70 To: <sip:1005@example.com;transport=udp>;tag=f055057275da74fa400fb8f3e0bfdfcf-718a1cd7 From: <sip:10004@example.com>;tag=602c0c864ab45075 Call-ID: 181910a72dc93418 CSeq: 26763 SUBSCRIBE User-Agent: polycomVVX-VVX_400-UA/5.8.5.1256 Event: dialog Accept: application/dialog-info+xml Expires: 600 Supported: Content-Length: 0 [11:37:02.276] RX from x.x.x.x:5060: SIP/2.0 500 Server Internal Error Via: SIP/2.0/UDP y.y.y.y:51761;branch=z9hG4bK496e53396451225a;rport=51761;received=y.y.y.y To: <sip:1005@example.com;transport=udp>;tag=f055057275da74fa400fb8f3e0bfdfcf-718a1cd7 From: <sip:10004@example.com>;tag=602c0c864ab45075 Call-ID: 181910a72dc93418 CSeq: 26763 SUBSCRIBE Content-Length: 0 ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` kamailio version: 5.5.0 (x86_64/linux) d4c1a1 postgres version: 12.7 ``` Presence configuration: ``` modparam("presence_dialoginfo", "force_dummy_dialog", 1) modparam("presence_dialoginfo", "force_single_dialog", 1) modparam("presence_xml", "force_dummy_presence", 1) modparam("presence_xml", "force_active", 1) modparam("presence_xml", "disable_winfo", 1) modparam("presence_xml", "disable_bla", 1) modparam("presence", "subs_db_mode", 3) modparam("presence", "expires_offset", 0) modparam("presence", "send_fast_notify", 1) modparam("presence", "clean_period", 0) modparam("presence", "db_update_period", 0) modparam("presence", "publ_cache", 0) modparam("presence", "min_expires_action", 1) modparam("presence", "min_expires", 300) modparam("presence", "max_expires", 3600) modparam("presence", "sip_uri_match", 1) modparam("presence", "waitn_time", 1) modparam("presence", "notifier_processes", 1) modparam("presence", "db_url", "postgres://kamailio:***********@127.0.0.1/kamailio") modparam("presence", "xavp_cfg", "pres") modparam("presence", "local_log_level", 6) modparam("presence", "startup_mode", 0) modparam("presence", "force_delete", 1) modparam("presence", "timeout_rm_subs", 0) modparam("presence", "cseq_offset", 2) ``` db_postgres configuration: All defaults just loading the module ``` loadmodule "db_postgres.so" ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` Linux ********** 3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 13 23:58:53 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2739

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] when use pcscf_unregister behind nat (#2729)

by openspring

### Description  ``` As you can see in the picture, via_host and received_host are different when sending registration data from outside of NAT. However, in the pcscf_unregister function, via_host and received_host are the same value.The pcontact structure in memory could not be found ``` #### Log Messages  ``` ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/38756641/117534145-d0990d00-b022-11eb-9fd5-0c52437db2ad.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/38756641/117534235-1fdf3d80-b023-11eb-973e-d7ae3787e875.png) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ``` change the pcscf_unregister function, and add Two parameters ``` ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.4.4 (x86_64/linux) 8d6c2b flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 8d6c2b compiled on 14:04:08 Apr 26 2021 with gcc 4.8.5 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` Linux iZhp329ygro5y3v090vnwpZ 3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 18 16:35:19 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2729

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] lost: lost_held_dereference do not handles error message (#2724)

by sergey-safarov

### Description When LIS server failed, then LIS send message like ``` The error response to the request is an error document. The following response shows an example error response. HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Example LIS Expires: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:49:20 GMT Cache-control: private Content-Type: application/held+xml;charset=utf-8 Content-Length: 182 <?xml version="1.0"?> <error xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held" code="locationUnknown"> <message xml:lang="en">Unable to determine location </message> </error> ``` Here is HTTP code is 200. lost_held_dereference now simply check HTTP code and do not check XML body. Expected XML content check for: 1. XML HELD error message 2. check `findServiceResponse` or `presence` element check like it done for `lost_query`. This check is important because PIDF-LO object may be added to the multipart body. And HELD XML error handling prevents error message addition as PDF-LO object. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2724

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] Kamailio resets $ru in branch_route context, probably race condition (#2708)

by Henning Westerholt

### Description Kamailio resets the $ru in a branch_route context, probably due a race condition and/or bug. Scenario: - Calls is established and answered with 404 - Kamailio enters failure_route - failure_route calls t_relay() - branch_route is entered - new branch is created with $ru = $ru; - next operation trying to access content of the $ru fails: Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: pv [pv_core.c:325]: pv_get_ruri_attr(): failed to parse the R-URI ### Troubleshooting Happens on a production system, after upgrade from 5.2.x to 5.3.9. Research regarding similar bugs have not produced something useful so far. #### Reproduction Issue happens less than 10 times a day and so far could not be easily reproduced. #### Debugging Data Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: NOTICE: 7e8bb2ba47f5ccc |-----> Failure Code 404<- Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[Failure] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1720 a=5 n=route Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=703 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=699 a=25 n=is_method Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=702 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=701 a=25 n=t_is_set Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=701 a=25 n=t_on_branch Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=707 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=703 a=25 n=is_method Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=706 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=705 a=25 n=t_is_set Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=707 a=25 n=t_on_branch_failure Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=720 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=711 a=25 n=is_method Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=714 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=713 a=25 n=t_is_set Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=713 a=25 n=t_on_failure Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=742 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=720 a=24 n=t_relay Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:branch_route=[MANAGE_BRANCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=2142 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:branch_route=[MANAGE_BRANCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=2135 a=63 n=assign Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:branch_route=[MANAGE_BRANCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=2147 a=16 n=if Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:branch_route=[MANAGE_BRANCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=2142 a=25 n=is_method Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:branch_route=[MANAGE_BRANCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=2142 a=63 n=assign Apr 13 11:44:39 proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2202]: ERROR: pv [pv_core.c:325]: pv_get_ruri_attr(): failed to parse the R-URI #### Log Messages See cfgtrace logging above. #### SIP Traffic Not easily to provide as its a productive system in a clustered setup. ### Possible Solutions Ideas on how to further debug this error are welcome. ### Additional Information * kamailio 5.3.9 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2708

1 year

[kamailio/kamailio] [Feature] RFC 8760 support (#2668)

by Timothy Vanderaerden

### Description As far as I know there is currently no support for [RFC-8760](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8760) yet. It modifies the Digest Access Authentication scheme to add support for more secure digest algorithms, e.g., SHA-256 and SHA-512/256, to replace the obsolete MD5 algorithm. Are there any plans to implement this? ### Possible Solutions Extending the auth module to accept these algorithms as a function parameter would be nice to have since older clients may not support them. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2668

1 year

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev April 2022