sr-dev August 2020

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

17 participants
210 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] $(hdr(foo)[idx]) is 0-based, textopsx.remove_hf_value("foo[idx]") is 1-based, they should be the same (#2387)

by Sebastian Damm

### Description We have some JS code looping over all P-Asserted-Identity headers removing some of the entries: ``` let headerIndex = 0; const telUriMatcher = new RegExp("tel:"); let paiValue = ksr.pv .gete("$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity)[" + headerIndex + "])") .toString(); while (paiValue.length > 0) { ksr.info( `${ksr.pv.getw("$ci")}: Found P-A-I header with content <${ksr.pv.getw( "$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity)[" + headerIndex + "])" )}> at index ${headerIndex}\n` ); if (telUriMatcher.test(paiValue)) { ksr.info( `${ksr.pv.getw("$ci")}: Removed P-A-I header ${ksr.pv.getw( "$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity)[" + headerIndex + "])" )}\n` ); ksr.textopsx.remove_hf_value( "P-Asserted-Identity[" + headerIndex + "]" ); } headerIndex++; paiValue = ksr.pv .gete("$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity)[" + headerIndex + "])") .toString(); } ``` In our tests, we wanted to remove the second header, but the first one got removed instead. The pseudovars docs say, the index of a header is 0-based. In textopsx docs it doesn't explicitly say, it's 1-based, but the first example shows it actually is. ### Possible Solutions Right now, we replaced the line ``` ksr.textopsx.remove_hf_value("P-Asserted-Identity[" + headerIndex + "]"); ``` with this one: ``` ksr.textopsx.remove_hf_value("P-Asserted-Identity[" + (headerIndex + 1) + "]"); ``` This solves the problem, but it is not what we would expect. Both header access methods should use the same index base. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.3.5 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 8.3.0 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` Linux hostname 4.19.0-9-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.118-2+deb10u1 (2020-06-07) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2387

2 years, 2 months

[kamailio/kamailio] xavp set in event_route[tm:local-request] are not used in SIP transaction (#2413)

by arkadiam

### Description I'm using dispatcher module like: ``` loadmodule "dispatcher.so" modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 60) ``` With records like: ``` 1 sip:sip.host.com;transport=tls 0 1 socket=tls:111.222.233.10:5061;ping_from=sip:my-domain-01.com 2 sip:sip.host.com;transport=tls 0 1 socket=tls:111.222.233.20:5061;ping_from=sip:my-domain-02.com ``` In event_route[tm:local-request] I'm modifying 'Contact' and would like to specify what client TLS profile to use via server name or server id. ``` event_route[tm:local-request] { if(is_method("OPTIONS")) { append_hf("Contact: <sip:some-host.com;transport=tls>\r\n"); $xavp(tls=>server_name)=$fd; $xavp(tls[0]=>server_id)=$fd; } } ``` Setting 'tls' xavp doesn't make any difference and default client TLS profile is being used. It happens because in src/modules/tm/uac.c there is a code: ``` t_run_local_req() ... tm_xdata_swap(new_cell, &backup_xd, 0); ... /* restore original environment */ tm_xdata_swap(new_cell, &backup_xd, 1); ``` which resets any xavp changes done in event_route[tm:local-request]. Expected behaviour: ability to use xavp in tm:local-request route. That would allow to choose TLS client profile for dispatcher initiated requests. ### Possible Solutions As a hack, in tm_xdata_swap() for mode=1, don't restore xavp list if it was NULL. ``` if (x->xavps_list != NULL && *x->xavps_list==NULL) { // .... don't restore empty list... } else { xavp_set_list(x->xavps_list); } ``` This change allows to select required TLS profile for dispatcher requests. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.3.5 (x86_64/linux) ff2f8c-dirty flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: ff2f8c -dirty compiled on 10:19:05 Jul 28 2020 with gcc 7.5.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Linux xx 4.15.0-111-generic #112-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 20:32:34 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2413

2 years, 2 months

[kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

by mojtabaesfandiari

lreproxy: add new lreproxy module   #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208 -- Commit Summary -- * lreproxy module -- File Changes -- A src/modules/lreproxy/README.md (1) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy.c (1976) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy.h (120) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_funcs.c (460) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_funcs.h (41) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_hash.c (521) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_hash.h (70) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208

2 years, 3 months

[kamailio/kamailio] CDP / IMS Diameter Server Module- diameter_request() function fails to send/forward request (#2035)

by Nick

Hi Kamailio team, I'm attempting to use Kamailio as a Diameter Routing Agent, but I can't seem to get the diameter_request() function to actually _send_ the diameter request, instead I get a warning about no JSON Response: > WARNING: ims_diameter_server [avp_helper.c:341]: addAVPsfromJSON(): No JSON Response Even when relaying received data without modifying it. I posted this issue on the mailing list but have had no responses. Since then I've run a bunch more tests on a few different versions of Kamailio with a few different Diameter peers with the same result. ### Description The IMS Diameter Server Module's[ diameter_request() function](https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/ims_diameter_… fails to send, reporting "No JSON Response" even when fed unmodified received data into it. ### Troubleshooting Initially I was trying to use CDP & IMS Diameter Server Module to create & send Diameter messages, I thought my formatting in the message (the Diameter Message (as JSON)) was incorrect. as I was getting: > WARNING: ims_diameter_server [avp_helper.c:341]: addAVPsfromJSON(): No JSON Response When trying to send the request. To rule out my JSON formatting being the issue I configured two Diameter Peers in Kamailio: >From one Diameter peer, I sent a Diameter request to Kamailio. Kamailio is configured to receive the Diameter request, and without modifying the message body ($diameter_request), put that message into the message of the the diameter_request() so as to rule out formatting errors in the message, just a relay of the message, but this also fails to send. I also included a series of checks to confirm the peer to receive the relayed message was online and capable of handling the specified Diameter application, all of which passed. I've defined the peers in the diametercfg.xml config file, and they're all showing as online when I do a "kamcmd cdp.list_peers": FQDN: ims-hss.localdomain Details: { State: I_Open Disabled: False Last used: 0 Applications: { appid:vendorid: 16777216:10415 appid:vendorid: 16777216:4491 appid:vendorid: 16777216:13019 appid:vendorid: 16777216:0 appid:vendorid: 16777217:10415 appid:vendorid: 16777221:10415 } } Here's a simplified version of my event_route[diameter:request], showing I simply receive the diameter request and then try to send it straight back out using the diameter_request() function: ``` event_route[diameter:request]{ xlog("Got diameter message"); diameter_request("ims-hss.localdomain", $diameter_application, $diameter_command, $diameter_request); xlog("Forwarded Diameter Request"); } ``` When tailing syslog I see the "Got diameter message" entry but not the "Forwarded Diameter Request", which suggests it's not getting past the diameter_request(), instead I just see the: > WARNING: ims_diameter_server [avp_helper.c:341]: addAVPsfromJSON(): No JSON Response Packet captures show Kamailio receives the request but never relays it. The source of avp_helper.c shows the warning is called if the length of the JSON is <= 0, but as I'm feeding back out what I've received it shouldn't be 0, an no recent major changes to the source, so I'm stumped as to why it's catching this. I've attached a full copy of the config files below. #### Reproduction I've tried this with a few different Diameter servers, but I can reproduce it with two FreeDIAMETER peers configured in Diameter CDP Config XML, I've also tried with one Kamailio CDP based peer and using xhttp to call the diameter_request() function with the same results. #### Log Messages Copy of relevant SysLog: https://pastebin.com/ZY8z2kd4 ### Additional Information Full Kamailio Config: https://pastebin.com/afgqUfWr Diameter CDP Config XML: https://pastebin.com/bVrBG8mG Relevant Syslog: https://pastebin.com/ZY8z2kd4 Kamcmd cdp.list_peers: https://pastebin.com/cKi4JAHC Kamailio 5.1.2 on Ubuntu 18.04 installed from Repos. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2035

2 years, 3 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Kamailio not retrieving custom or default socket when sending timed REGISTER messages (#2262)

by kdanderso

### Description When using Kamailio in a multi-homed configuration to register with another device using the uac module, it does not retrieve the custom or default socket information for timed registration attempts. It does, however, use the custom/default socket data for the initial registration. #### Reproduction The network is configured for two addresses: 10.9.9.121/24 and 10.9.7.121/24. Two floating IP addresses are also assigned (via Pacemaker/Corosync): 10.9.9.120/24 and 10.9.7.120/24. For testing, all addresses can be assigned permanently, so it is not necessary to have Pacemaker/Corosync installed. MySQL database has a user in the uacreg table with the socket column set to udp:10.9.7.120:5060. kamailio.cfg includes the following to enable sending of REGISTER messages: mhomed = 1 listen=udp:10.9.9.120 listen=udp:10.9.7.120 #!define DBURL "mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@10.9.9.101/kamailio" modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 1); modparam("uac", "reg_db_url", DBURL); modparam("uac", "reg_contact_addr", "10.9.7.120:5060"); modparam("uac", "reg_keep_callid", 1); modparam("uac", "default_socket", "udp:10.9.7.120:5060"); modparam("uac", "reg_timer_interval", 30); #### Log Messages The initial REGISTER outputs the following log data. The registration completes successfully. Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: uac [uac.c:407]: child_init(): run initial uac registration routine Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: uac [uac_reg.c:1172]: uac_reg_update(): using custom socket udp:10.9.7.120:5060 to send request Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:628]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.9.7.120] == [10.9.9.120] Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:635]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:628]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.9.7.120] == [10.9.7.120] Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:635]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:435]: t_uac_prepare(): next_hop=<sip:10.9.7.102> Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:158]: dlg2hash(): hashid 3846 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:244]: t_run_local_req(): executing event_route[tm:local-request] Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): SIP Request: Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:10.9.7.102> Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:616]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK60f.6fd7c907000000000000000000000000.0>; state=16 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]: parse_headers(): this is the first via Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: exec: *** cfgtrace:local_route=[tm:local-request] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=229 a=26 n=xlog Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <script>: In event_route(tm:local-request) Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:664]: send_prepared_request_impl(): uac: 0x7268e184 branch: 0 to 10.9.7.102:5060 When the timer expires, the following is logged. Since the socket is not found, the registration fails: Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:435]: t_uac_prepare(): next_hop=<sip:10.9.7.102> Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:181]: get_out_socket(): no socket found Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:10.9.7.102:5060) Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:316]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "10.9.7.102" af 2 (udp:10.9.7.102:5060) Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: tm [uac.c:463]: t_uac_prepare(): no socket found Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:132]: free_cell_helper(): freeing transaction 0x7268de10 from uac.c:604 Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: uac [uac_reg.c:1196]: uac_reg_update(): failed to send request for [kamailioha] ### Additional Information version: kamailio 5.3.2 (arm6/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 17:22:05 Mar 18 2020 with gcc 8.3.0 * **Operating System**: Linux kam_test 4.19.75-v7+ #1270 SMP Tue Sep 24 18:45:11 BST 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2262

2 years, 4 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Deadlocks after ungracefully terminated TLS connections (#2395)

by Laszlo

This bug report concerns a Kamailio instance that's functioning as an edge proxy, accepting requests from clients over TLS and forwarding them to internal components over UDP. I've observed occasional "deadlocks" that all take place after there were connectivity issues between Kamailio and one or more of the clients (logging messages such as "tcp_send failed", "handle_tcpconn_ev(): connect x failed", "tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer"). Environment: * Ubuntu 16.04 * Kamailio 5.2.7 (5.2.7+ubuntu16.04) Relevant config: ``` # for TLS clients socket_workers=10 listen=tls:wan.ip:TLS_PORT # to be able to forward incoming TCP requests to UDP destinations socket_workers=10 listen=udp:wan.ip:TLS_PORT # for RPC commands socket_workers=2 listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:HTTP_PORT ``` ## Reproduction After a lot of trial and error, I've found a way to somewhat reproducibly trigger the problem using sipp. It involves setting up a large amount of simultaneous calls dialing into the edge proxy using TLS, to a destination UA that will answer the call and keep it open for a few seconds, then using `ctrl-c` to suddenly quit sipp which will ungracefully terminate the TCP/TLS connections. It takes me a couple of iterations to trigger the problem, e.g repeat until Kamailio starts failing: * start sipp * terminate sipp with ctrl-c * (quickly) restart sipp * terminate sipp * etc The amount of simultaneous calls has to be sufficiently large. In my environment I'm unable to reproduce the problem at all with 10-20 calls, while 50 calls always triggers the problem after a couple of iterations. Example sipp commandline: `sipp -nd -sf caller.xml -d 2000 -r 50 -l 500 -m 5000 -max_socket 1000 -t ln -tls_cert cert.crt -tls_key key.key kamailio.edge.proxy:5061` ## Failure mode 1 In one of the failure modes, it appears that all available TCP/TLS workers are permanently bricked; sipp's calls will simply timeout and not trigger any dialplan handling. Interestingly, even though I have dedicated workers for TLS (SIP client) and TCP (RPC commands), and my reproduction scenario doesn't connect to the HTTP_PORT at all, this failure scenario bricks the TCP (RPC) listeners as well; any curl requests to it will simply timeout as well. Kamailio will hang for a while on (systemd) restart. ## Failure mode 2 In another failure mode, it looks like the TCP workers are unaffected but the UDP perform forwarding to UDP destinations are broken. Sipp's calls will enter Kamailio, but forwarding (`relay()`) to the next hop will timeout even though the destination is functioning just fine. Since this failure mode doesn't break RPC I was able to enable debug logging: ``` 2020-07-07T17:26:58.770411+02:00 kamailio[24056]: INFO: From Customer 2020-07-07T17:26:58.770697+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: pv [pv_trans.c:590]: tr_eval_string(): i=0 j=2 2020-07-07T17:26:58.770971+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2055]: ds_manage_routes(): set [4] 2020-07-07T17:26:58.771248+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2161]: ds_manage_routes(): using alg [0] hash [250849449] 2020-07-07T17:26:58.771535+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2205]: ds_manage_routes(): selected [0-4-0/1] <sip:wan.ip:8065> 2020-07-07T17:26:58.771817+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2226]: ds_manage_routes(): using first entry [4/1] 2020-07-07T17:26:58.772090+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2269]: ds_manage_routes(): using entry [4/0] 2020-07-07T17:26:58.772362+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2016]: ds_select_dst_limit(): selected target destinations: 2 2020-07-07T17:26:58.773001+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: pv [pv_core.c:2611]: pv_set_force_sock(): trying to set send-socket to [udp:wan.ip:5061] 2020-07-07T17:26:58.773353+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:559]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 13==13 && [wan.ip] == [wan.ip] 2020-07-07T17:26:58.773829+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:566]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5061 (advertise 0) matches port 5061 2020-07-07T17:26:58.774122+02:00 kamailio[24056]: NOTICE: Relaying (cid: 1-9151(a)sipp.ip). 2020-07-07T17:26:58.774417+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:120]: has_totag(): no totag 2020-07-07T17:26:58.774708+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1344]: t_newtran(): msg (0x7f69d1cc4980) id=1265/24056 global id=1265/24056 T start=(nil) 2020-07-07T17:26:58.774989+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:499]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=43232, isACK=0 2020-07-07T17:26:58.775315+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:457]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed - via branch [z9hG4bK-9151-1-1] 2020-07-07T17:26:58.775612+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:682]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found 2020-07-07T17:26:58.775908+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5 calculated: 0a5d4a8d13f9606523da9c4d193b2261 2020-07-07T17:26:58.776270+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/dns_cache.c:3197]: dns_srv_sip_resolve(): (wan.ip, 0, 0), ip, ret=0 2020-07-07T17:26:58.776701+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1765]: check_boundaries(): no multi-part body 2020-07-07T17:26:58.777012+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2935]: create_via_hf(): id added: <;i=a701>, rcv proto=3 2020-07-07T17:26:58.777596+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:375]: t_relay_to(): new transaction forwarded 2020-07-07T17:26:58.777948+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:354]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 1927 usec 2020-07-07T17:26:58.778243+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:636]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil) 2020-07-07T17:26:58.779265+02:00 kamailio[24056]: message repeated 5 times: [ DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:636]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)] 2020-07-07T17:26:58.779431+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/xavp.c:507]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp list (nil) 2020-07-07T17:26:58.779753+02:00 kamailio[24056]: DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:458]: receive_msg(): cleaning up 2020-07-07T17:27:00.705303+02:00 kamailio[24053]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1266]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 2020-07-07T17:27:00.705917+02:00 kamailio[24053]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1041]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7f69b1017e80) id=1264/24056 global id=1264/24056 T start=0x7f69b10167c0 2020-07-07T17:27:00.706187+02:00 kamailio[24053]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1116]: t_check_msg(): T (0x7f69b10167c0) already found for msg (0x7f69b1017e80)! 2020-07-07T17:27:00.706533+02:00 kamailio[24053]: DEBUG: tmx [t_var.c:539]: pv_get_tm_reply_code(): reply code is <408> 2020-07-07T17:27:00.706879+02:00 kamailio[24053]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1041]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7f69b1017e80) id=1264/24056 global id=1264/24056 T start=0x7f69b10167c0 2020-07-07T17:27:00.707198+02:00 kamailio[24053]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1116]: t_check_msg(): T (0x7f69b10167c0) already found for msg (0x7f69b1017e80)! 2020-07-07T17:27:00.707522+02:00 kamailio[24053]: DEBUG: tmx [t_var.c:594]: pv_get_tm_reply_reason(): reply reason is [Request Timeout] { "DSC": "tcp receiver (tls:wan.ip:5061) child=0", "IDX": 14, "PID": 24056 }, { "DSC": "slow timer", "IDX": 11, "PID": 24053 }, ``` Kamailio will restart (systemd) normally and everything will function normally again afterwards. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2395

2 years, 5 months

[kamailio/kamailio] core: main - Protect async-signal-unsafe code in sig_usr() with SIG_DEBUG (#2127)

by Guillem Jover

#### Pre-Submission Checklist - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist: - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description The sig_usr() signal handler contains debug code to print memory usage and statistics that is not async-signal-safe, which can cause crashes or misbehavior. This code which only affects explicit SIGUSR1 signals on children processes, and is not guarded with the SIG_DEBUG macro. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2127 -- Commit Summary -- * core: main - Protect async-signal-unsafe code in sig_usr() with SIG_DEBUG -- File Changes -- M src/main.c (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2127.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2127.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2127

2 years, 6 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Expand the list of required default 3rd party libraries for Kamailio (#969)

by Olle E. Johansson

(from devmeeting #Fosdem) - adding new dependencies as core dependencies - Curl - libssl - uuid - libunistring - libxml2 Any other candidates? They have to be libraries that are commonly installed on most Linux/Unix system. This would mean that a lot of more modules will be built by default, like TLS, HTTP_CLIENT, WEBSOCKET. We may also look over the names of the packages/groups for the build system and linux distros -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/969

2 years, 6 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Kamailio on RHEL/Centos 8 issue with SCTP associations created towards endpoint's primary and secondary IP addresses (#2429)

by Piotr Grabowski

### Description Kamailio is unable to create a SCTP association to IP address that is reachable normally when dispatcher.list is configured as following: ``` 760320003 sip:10.59.144.2:5063;transport=sctp 9 0 dstid=1 760320003 sip:10.59.144.130:5063;transport=sctp 9 0 dstid=1 ``` 10.59.144.2 and 10.59.144.130 are IPs of same endpoint treated as primary and secondary, Kamailio can't send probe (OPTIONS requests) as SCTP association can't be created. Issue doesn't exist on RHEL/Centos 6. ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction Use previously mentioned dispatcher list with changed IP addresses to match local configuration. SCTP part of kamailio.cfg ``` # if not OS default is used #modparam("sctp", "sctp_socket_rcvbuf", 14096) #modparam("sctp", "sctp_socket_sndbuf", 14096) # Number of milliseconds before an unsent message/chunk is dropped. modparam("sctp", "sctp_send_ttl", 10000) modparam("sctp", "sctp_autoclose", 300) # How many times to attempt re-sending a message on a re-opened association, if the sctp stack did give up sending it (it's not related to sctp protocol level retransmission). Useful to improve reliability with peers that reboot/restart or fail over to another machine. modparam("sctp", "sctp_send_retries", 1) modparam("sctp", "sctp_srto_initial", 200) modparam("sctp", "sctp_srto_max", 250) modparam("sctp", "sctp_srto_min", 150) modparam("sctp", "sctp_asocmaxrxt", 4) modparam("sctp", "sctp_init_max_attempts", 3) modparam("sctp", "sctp_init_max_timeo", 1000) modparam("sctp", "sctp_hbinterval", 1000) modparam("sctp", "sctp_pathmaxrxt", 2) modparam("sctp", "sctp_sack_delay", 10) modparam("sctp", "sctp_sack_freq", 1) modparam("sctp", "sctp_max_burst", 4) ``` #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3234]: ds_ping_result_helper(): probing set, but not mode DS_PROBE_INACTIVE Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3268]: ds_ping_set(): probing set #760320003, URI sip:10.59.144.2:5063;transport=sctp Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3293]: ds_ping_set(): Default ping_from: sip:siplb@sdp.t-mobile.at Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:435]: t_uac_prepare(): next_hop=<sip:10.59.144.2:5063;transport=sctp> Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: <core> [core/resolve.c:1244]: srv_sip_resolvehost(): 10.59.144.2:5063 proto=4 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2281]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.130:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.130:5063: SCTP_ADDR_ADDED: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: <core> [core/resolve.c:1356]: srv_sip_resolvehost(): returning 0xa7c280 (10.59.144.2:5063 proto=4) Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:158]: dlg2hash(): hashid 27287 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2281]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.130:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.130:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2280]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.130:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.130:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:652]: send_prepared_request_impl(): uac: 0x7fbf4eb4e5b8 branch: 0 to 10.59.144.2:5063 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2294]: DEBUG: tm [../../core/onsend.h:69]: run_onsend(): required parameters are not available - ignoring Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2282]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.2:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.2:5063: SCTP_ADDR_ADDED: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2278]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.2:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.2:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2282]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.2:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.2:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2285]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.2:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.2:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2283]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.130:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.130:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2279]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.130:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.130:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:13 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2279]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.2:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.2:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:14 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2280]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.2:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.2:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:14 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2278]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2317]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.130:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE: 10.59.144.130:5063: SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM: assoc_id 0 Aug 6 18:19:15 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2285]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2340]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.130:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_ASSOC_CHANGE: SCTP_CANT_STR_ASSOC: assoc_id 0, ostreams 0, istreams 0 Aug 6 18:19:15 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2282]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2340]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.2:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_ASSOC_CHANGE: SCTP_CANT_STR_ASSOC: assoc_id 0, ostreams 0, istreams 0 Aug 6 18:19:15 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2285]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2299]: sctp_handle_notification(): sctp notification from 10.59.144.2:5063 on sdp-lbref02-sigtran01:5060: SCTP_SEND_FAILED: error 0, assoc_id 0, flags 0 Aug 6 18:19:15 sdp-lbref02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2285]: DEBUG: sctp [sctp_server.c:2098]: sctp_handle_send_failed(): sctp: RETRY-ing (1) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  Issue is gone when one of IP addresses is removed from dispatcher.list. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.3.5 (x86_64/linux) 9e70e8 flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 9e70e8 compiled on 12:22:26 Jun 22 2020 with gcc 8.3.1 ``` Also tested latest 5.2 and 5.4 * **Operating System**:  ``` [root@sdp-lbref02 ~]# uname -a Linux sdp-lbref02 4.18.0-193.14.3.el8_2.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 20 15:02:29 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@sdp-lbref02 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.2 (Ootpa) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2429

2 years, 6 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Branch ordering behavior changed since v5.3.4 (#2449)

by Cindy Leung

2 years, 6 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
21
Older →

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev August 2020