sr-dev October 2019

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

22 participants
437 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] db_check_table_version(): invalid version 6 for table subscriber found, expected 7 (check table structure and table "version") (#1270)
by abell-star 30 Jan '20

30 Jan '20

kamailio version：5.0.1 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1270

6 9

[kamailio/kamailio] developing hiops module (#1856)
by mojtabaesfandiari 28 Jan '20

28 Jan '20

This is new module in Kamailio, named hiops module. I am developing and it take few time to done. In all over the module i used LM_INFO instead of LM_DBG, just for much easy troubleshooting. And also I would use lock for share memory in all project. These are some 'todo' project that i have to do.   #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1856 -- Commit Summary -- * add received_in_via function(use it in hiops module) * developing hiops module -- File Changes -- M src/core/msg_translator.c (25) M src/core/msg_translator.h (3) A src/modules/hiops (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1856.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1856.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1856

4 22

[kamailio/kamailio] centos7 rpm for evapi (#2098)
by sergey-safarov 21 Dec '19

21 Dec '19

Please package evapi into centos7 rpm. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2098

2 8

[kamailio/kamailio] Kamailio not using SNI in for incoming requests (#1938)
by Laszlo 20 Dec '19

20 Dec '19

I'm using Kamailio 5.2.2+xenial. Set up a basic tls.cfg like this: ``` [server:default] verify_certificate = no require_certificate = no private_key = /tmp/default.key certificate = /tmp/default.pem [server:any] method = TLSv1 verify_certificate = no require_certificate = no private_key = /tmp/domain.key certificate = /tmp/domain.pem server_name = sip.domain.com server_name_mode = 1 ``` Connect with openssl like this `openssl s_client -connect server:5061` and Kamailio will - obviously - offer the default.pem certificate. However, use `openssl s_client -connect server:5061 -servername sip.domain.com` and Kamailio will still offer the default.pem certificate, where I'd expect it to offer domain.pem. I tested these `openssl` commandline invocations against an nginx server that's working with these same certificates, and SNI is working properly there. >From the Kamailio logs on starting up, it does seem to detect that a SNI callback should be registered with OpenSSL. ``` Apr 25 11:43:37 kamailio[7447]: NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:1083]: ksr_tls_fix_domain(): registered server_name callback handler for socket [:0], server_name='sip.domain.com' ... ``` However, it's not triggering: ``` Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/ip_addr.c:229]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 4.1.3.1 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:999]: tcpconn_new(): on port 55428, type 3 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1305]: tcpconn_add(): hashes: 3726:2401:2691, 1 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa86c60, 60, 2, 0x7f00ad8279b0), fd_no=51 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:602]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0xa86c60, 60, -1, 0x0) fd_no=52 called Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4196]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): sending to child, events 1 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:3875]: send2child(): selected tcp worker idx:0 proc:44 pid:7342 for activity on [tls:1.6.1.6:5061], 0x7f00ad8279b0 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1759]: handle_io(): received n=8 con=0x7f00ad8279b0, fd=10 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:199]: tls_complete_init(): completing tls connection initialization Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:228]: tls_complete_init(): Using initial TLS domain TLSs<default> (dom 0x7f00ad1b02e8 ctx 0x7f00ad406408 sn []) Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:1155]: tls_lookup_private_key(): Private key lookup for SSL_CTX-0x7f00ad406408: (nil) Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:737]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake started Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2460]: tcpconn_do_send(): sending... Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2494]: tcpconn_do_send(): after real write: c= 0x7f00ad8279b0 n=2817 fd=10 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2495]: tcpconn_do_send(): buf=#012#026#003#001 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xae0200, 10, 2, 0x7f00ad8279b0), fd_no=1 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:1155]: tls_lookup_private_key(): Private key lookup for SSL_CTX-0x7f00ad406408: (nil) Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:749]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake done Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:753]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL disable renegotiation Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:424]: tls_accept(): TLS accept successful Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:431]: tls_accept(): tls_accept: new connection from 4.1.3.1:55428 using TLSv1/SSLv3 AES256-SHA 256 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:434]: tls_accept(): tls_accept: local socket: 1.6.1.6:5061 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:445]: tls_accept(): tls_accept: client did not present a certificate Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2460]: tcpconn_do_send(): sending... Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2494]: tcpconn_do_send(): after real write: c= 0x7f00ad8279b0 n=266 fd=10 Apr 25 11:39:04 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2495]: tcpconn_do_send(): buf=#012#026#003#001 Apr 25 11:39:10 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:602]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0xae0200, 10, -1, 0x10) fd_no=2 called Apr 25 11:39:10 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1680]: release_tcpconn(): releasing con 0x7f00ad8279b0, state 1, fd=10, id=1 ([4.1.3.1]:55428 -> [4.1.3.1]:5061) Apr 25 11:39:10 kamailio[7342]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1684]: release_tcpconn(): extra_data 0x7f00ad7c4ab8 Apr 25 11:39:10 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:3307]: handle_tcp_child(): reader response= 7f00ad8279b0, 1 from 0 Apr 25 11:39:10 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa86c60, 60, 2, 0x7f00ad8279b0), fd_no=51 Apr 25 11:39:10 kamailio[7344]: DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:3434]: handle_tcp_child(): CONN_RELEASE 0x7f00ad8279b0 refcnt= 1 ``` Looking at other issues like #1574, I think I'm supposed to see a `tls_server_name_cb` log line upon connecting, but there is none. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1938

4 10

[kamailio/kamailio] dispatcher ds_probing_mode inconsistent behaviour (#2100)
by Henning Westerholt 19 Dec '19

19 Dec '19

I observed inconsistent behaviour in the dispatcher module. In some modes either the code needs to be fixed or the documentation adapted. As it is a widely used module, some feedback about this would be appreciated. 1) ds_probing_mode 0 This mode don't work together with a ds_inactive_threshold > 1 and gateway set to "IP". It will set a gateway to IX after the first successful ping. Therefore gateways will not be activated automatically. In mode "TP" it works and sets the gateway to "AX". My suggestion would be to fix this in the code, that it behaves as mode 1 and 3: count to the ds_inactive_threshold and then set to "AX". 2) ds_probing_mode 2 According to the docs this should like this: “only gateways in inactive state with probing mode set are tested”. I understood it that it means gateways with mode "IP". But according to my tests it also probes gateways in "TP" or "AP" probing state and changes this both to AX. Either the documentation or the module behaviour should be fixed. The same issue mentioned above (ds_probing_mode 0 together with ds_inactive_threshold > 1) is also present. I also would suggest to fix it in the code here as well. root@sip:/etc/kamailio# kamcmd core.version kamailio 5.4.0-dev1 (x86_64/linux) 8ee711 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2100

1 2

[kamailio/kamailio] dialog: adding RPC dlg.kill_active_dlg command (#2111)
by jklingenmeyer 17 Dec '19

17 Dec '19

- only handles active dialogs in state 4 - wipes out a given dialog callously - no subcalls to dialog-ending functions - dialog is then removed by the recurring cleaning function execution - as discussed in sr-users in topic "[Dialog] Removing entries from dialog memory" #### Pre-Submission Checklist - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist: - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description Hi, As discussed in the sr-users mailing-list, I am proposing this PR to add a very simple new rpc command to the dialog module. dlg.kill_active_dialog kills any given active dialog from memory. A paragraph in the dialog documentation precises the dangerous nature of this command, to be used with caution. Please feel free to discuss about it. Thanks! Julien You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2111 -- Commit Summary -- * dialog: adding RPC dlg.kill_active_dlg command -- File Changes -- M src/modules/dialog/dialog.c (56) M src/modules/dialog/doc/dialog.xml (5) M src/modules/dialog/doc/dialog_admin.xml (33) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2111.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2111.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2111

2 6

[kamailio/kamailio] cfgt: RPC command to reset/clean test scenario (#574)
by Victor Seva 05 Dec '19

05 Dec '19

allow to clean the shared and private info of a test scenario in order to be able to re-trigger it without restart kamailio --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/574

1 1

Kamailio as SBC for Microsoft Teams
by Henning Westerholt 29 Nov '19

29 Nov '19

Hello, I have created a "How-To" blog post on using Kamailio as "session border controller" for Microsoft Teams Direct Routing: https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams You can this way use all the existing possibilities that Kamailio provide to interact with MS Teams as well. Best regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services

6 8

[kamailio/kamailio] cancel the branches instantly instead of on provisional replies (#909)
by aqsyounas 25 Nov '19

25 Nov '19

I am forking a call to multiple destinations and want to keep the only branch which sends quicker provisional 180/183 reply and cancel the remaining branches. Below is my related cfg snippet. modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3) modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30000) modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 120000) modparam("tm", "cancel_b_method", 2) ... route[SIPOUT] { if (uri==myself) return; append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); append_branch(); append_branch(); route(RELAY); exit; } onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] { xdbg("incoming reply\n"); if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") { xlog("L_INFO","Received $rs (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); if(status=~"18[03]"){ t_cancel_branches("others"); xlog("L_INFO","cancelled all other branches\n"); } route(NATMANAGE); } } ... But I see kamailio does not instantly send CANCEL to other branches after it has received 180/180 from any branch. Kamailio is sending CANCEL to other branches after they start sending 180/183 one by one. I want to cancel other brances instantly as soon as i get reply from any other branch. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/909

3 4

[kamailio/kamailio] Unexpected log_systemd behavior when daemon is forked (#799)
by Anthony Messina 22 Nov '19

22 Nov '19

Starting Kamailio (4.4 with branch updates through e43d82d applied) with the following systemd unit file, native systemd/journald logging doesn't work as expected. I *do* get core logging when I use ``` log_engine_type="systemd" loadmodule "log_systemd.so" ``` but `xlog` and `sd_journal_print` *don't* send anything to the journal. When I comment out `log_engine_type`, keeping the log_systemd.so module loaded, `sd_journal_print` *does* log the messages properly to the systemd journal, `xlog` and core startup messages are sent to syslog. If I change the service to `Type=simple` and add the `-D` option to `ExecStart` to disable forking, then logging to systemd via `xlog` and `sd_journal_print` works, but TCP/TLS listeners aren't created. ``` [Unit] Description=Kamailio SIP Server Documentation=man:kamailio(8) http://www.kamailio.org/ After=syslog.target network-online.target Wants=network-online.target [Service] Type=forking User=kamailio Environment=SHM_SIZE=64 Environment=PKG_SIZE=8 ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/kamailio -c ExecStart=/usr/sbin/kamailio -m $SHM_SIZE -M $PKG_SIZE -P /run/kamailio/kamailio.pid PIDFile=/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid Restart=on-failure RestartSec=30 RuntimeDirectory=kamailio RuntimeDirectoryMode=0750 [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/799

3 16

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
44
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev October 2019