sr-dev November 2017

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

26 participants
481 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] topos and dialog timeout conflict (#1216)

by dryvoip

### Description When topos is loaded and dialog is configured to timeout a call by sending BYE to each side, the Route: header is lost and one of the BYEs is not sent to the correct destination. This problem does not exist when topos is not loaded. ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction ``` modparam("dialog", "rr_param", "dv") modparam("dialog", "profiles_with_value", "inbound_call ; outbound_call; timed_call") modparam("dialog", "dlg_match_mode", 1) modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", 4) modparam("dialog", "send_bye", 1) modparam("dialog", "timer_procs", 1) modparam("dialog", "timeout_noreset", 1) modparam("dialog", "default_timeout", 43200) $avp(limit) = 15; dlg_manage(); dlg_set_timeout_by_profile("timed_call", "1", "$avp(limit)"); dlg_set_timeout($avp(limit)); set_dlg_profile("timed_call", "1"); ``` #### Log Messages ``` Aug 14 11:06:28 x /usr/sbin/kamailio[11925]: WARNING: dialog [dlg_req_within.c:216]: bye_reply_cb(): inconsitent dlg timer data on dlg 0x7fe5e0b162f8 [438:1408] with clid 'fPBP01fpFOA5Lq6aVwtZ6Q..' and tags '9f514a4f' 'as6e1fd9bc' Aug 14 11:06:28 x /usr/sbin/kamailio[11925]: NOTICE: acc [acc_cdr.c:352]: log_write_cdr(): start_time=1502733971.701; end_time=1502733988.052; duration=16.351 Aug 14 11:06:28 x /usr/sbin/kamailio[11925]: WARNING: acc [acc_cdr.c:219]: db_write_cdr(): fallback to dlg_only search because of message doesn't exist. ``` #### SIP Traffic Good bye (without topos loaded) ``` 2017-08-14 10:06:29 -0800 : 10.10.10.180:5060 -> 10.10.10.177:5065 BYE sip:2505551234@10.20.20.224:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.180;branch=z9hG4bKbe16.c8c401b7000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:2505551234@mtl.dryvoip.ca;transport=UDP>;tag=as6e1fd9bc From: <sip:1715033_123@mtl.dryvoip.ca;transport=UDP>;tag=9f514a4f CSeq: 3 BYE Call-ID: fPBP01fpFOA5Lq6aVwtZ6Q.. Route: <sip:10.10.10.177:5065;lr=on> Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: kamailio (5.0.2 (x86_64/linux)) Max-Forwards: 70 ``` Bad bye (with topos loaded) ``` 2017-08-14 09:50:35 -0800 : 10.10.10.180:5060 -> 10.20.20.224:5060 BYE sip:2505551234@10.20.20.224:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.180;branch=z9hG4bK2409.87c78083000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:2505551234@mtl.dryvoip.ca;transport=UDP>;tag=as574ee653 From: <sip:1715033_123@mtl.dryvoip.ca;transport=UDP>;tag=df42e302 CSeq: 3 BYE Call-ID: s1A7v71pjL_HNxHBscGpSg.. Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: kamailio (5.0.2 (x86_64/linux)) Max-Forwards: 70 ``` ### Possible Solutions ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.0.2 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 12:04:13 Jun 26 2017 with gcc 4.4.7 ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1216

6 years, 3 months

[kamailio/kamailio] carrierroute: cr.dump_routes prints error or hangs after over 100 prefixes (#1304)

by Rick

### Description Try to fill carrierroute with routing data and test result with `kamcmd`, but the rpc command never gives a result. ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction ``` /* ----- ctl params -------------------------------------------------------- */ modparam("ctl", "binrpc", "unix:/var/run/kamailio/kamailio_ctl") modparam("ctl", "mode", 0660) /* ----- carrierroute params ----------------------------------------------- */ modparam("carrierroute", "config_source", "db") modparam("carrierroute", "db_url", "EXTERN_READ_DBURL") modparam("carrierroute", "fetch_rows", 2000) modparam("carrierroute", "db_load_description", 1) modparam("carrierroute", "match_mode", 10) modparam("carrierroute", "avoid_failed_destinations", 1) ``` Kamailio is running with the following parameters: ``` /usr/local/sbin/kamailio -u kamailio -g kamailio -m 512 -M 20 -n 16 ``` Fill carrierroute table with 110 Routes, do a routes reload and than try to get the routes dumped. `kamcmd cr.reload_routes` and after that issue `kamcmd cr.dump_routes`, which hangs and don't return a result. #### Log Messages ``` nothing regarding carrierroute in the log ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.1.0-dev8 (x86_64/freebsd) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, select, kqueue. id: unknown compiled on 20:35:54 Nov 1 2017 with clang 4.0 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1304

6 years, 3 months

[kamailio/kamailio] cfg_rpc: extending the functionality of cfg.get command (#1321)

by hdikme

- rpc_get function can be also called with only entering the group name information. Before it used to work only with group name and variable name and returning the value for a variable. With the enhancement, it is also possible to retrieve all variable values belonging to a specific group. e.g.: kamcmd cfg.get core. Above given example will print the values of all variables of the configuration group "core".   #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  rpc_get function can be also called with only entering the group name information. Before it used to work only with group name and variable name and returning the value for a variable. With the enhancement, it is also possible to retrieve all variable values belonging to a specific group. e.g.: kamcmd cfg.get core. Above given example will print the values of all variables of the configuration group "core". You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1321 -- Commit Summary -- * cfg_rpc: extending the functionality of cfg.get command -- File Changes -- M src/modules/cfg_rpc/cfg_rpc.c (112) M src/modules/cfg_rpc/doc/rpc.xml (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1321.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1321.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1321

6 years, 3 months

Contributing platform specific code to Kamailio

by Tsvetomir Dimitrov

Hello, I am working on a functionality which handles ipsec tunel creation for VoLTE registration and I'd like to contribute it to the project. However the code is heavily Linux specific - uses xfrm framework, so it won't compile on distribution with older kernels and definitely won't compile on *BSD. How problematic is this? How to handle this implementation so that it gets merged? Right now I can see two options: 1. Implement the functionality in ims_register_pcscf. 2. Implement separate ipsec module and handle the tunel creation/tear down from the configuration. The first solution is definitely the easiest one for implementation, but after my patch the module won't be as portable as it is now and I'm afraid my patch will be rejected. The second one separates the platform specific code in separate module and won't affect ims_register_pcscf. However I need data from ims_usrloc_pcscf, which is not accessible from the configuration. Also, writing separate module for a limited IPSEC handling seems like a overkill for me. What's your opinion? Best regards, Tsvetomir

6 years, 3 months

[kamailio/kamailio] sanity() test passes on invalid uri (#1289)

by juha-h

K master sanity() test passes URI hostpart that contains ` (back quote) character and possibly other invalid hostpart characters: Config: modparam("sanity", "default_checks", 1024) /* URI checks */ modparam("sanity", "uri_checks", 3) /* RURI, From */ xlog("L_INFO", "Checking $ru\n"); if (!sanity_check()) xlog("L_INFO", "Check failed\n"); else xlog("L_INFO", "Check passed\n"); Syslog: Oct 27 17:17:38 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[31946]: INFO: Checking sip:jh at te`st.fi Oct 27 17:17:38 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[31946]: INFO: Check passed According to RFC3261: hostname = *( domainlabel "." ) toplabel [ "." ] domainlabel = alphanum / alphanum *( alphanum / "-" ) alphanum -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1289

6 years, 3 months

[kamailio/kamailio] v5.0.4: nathelper: force_socket not being honoured (#1298)

by 00Asgaroth00

### Description The force_socket parameter is not always used when set. If I understand the module documentation correctly, when setting the force_socket parameter, then all nathelper udp traffic will be forced to use this socket definition. The issue here is a result of another issue first described [here](http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/NatHelper-ignoring-force-sock… in 2015 but is still present in current stable kamailio v5.0.4. We have 3 registrars running in "memory only" mode, using dmq_usrloc to replicate registrations to the remaining two nodes. On the remaining two nodes there is no socket parameter set for the AOR, but nathelper still wants to ping these AOR's. It is on these two systems where this issue exhibits itself. I will open another ticket for this scenario and try to reference it here as they are related. Each registrar has two interfaces, one is our "admin" lan, the other is our "voice" lan. The default route is set on these hosts and is a gateway on our "admin" lan. See issue #1297 When the registrars that are replicated to receive the AOR, they attempt to ping the endpoint (ideally they should not ping them). nathelper seems to think that the best interface to send them over is the "admin" lan even though force_socket is defined. I would have expected that the message should have been sent via the socket defined in the "force_socket" parameter. ### Troubleshooting Module definitions registrar ``` modparam("registrar", "method_filtering", 1) modparam("registrar", "case_sensitive", 1) modparam("registrar", "append_branches", 0) modparam("registrar", "use_path", 1) modparam("registrar", "path_mode", 0) modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) modparam("registrar", "path_check_local", 1) modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 1) ``` usrloc ``` modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 1) modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 60) modparam("usrloc", "timer_procs", 4) modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", 6) ``` nathelper ``` modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 20) modparam("nathelper", "natping_processes", 4) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 0) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:keepalive@example.com") modparam("nathelper", "sipping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "force_socket", "10.7.0.189:5060") modparam("nathelper", "udpping_from_path", 1) ``` Kamailio is listening on the same socket that is defined for the "force_socket" parameter above ``` listen=udp:10.6.0.189:5060 listen=udp:10.7.0.189:5060 listen=tcp:10.6.0.189:80 ``` dmq ``` modparam("dmq", "server_address", DMQ_ADDRESS) modparam("dmq", "notification_address", DMQ_NOTIFY_ADDRESS) modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1) modparam("dmq", "num_workers", 4) ``` dmq_usrloc ``` modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1) ``` #### Reproduction Using the above settings register a user and once they are replicated to the registrar that did not service the request, the options pings on the nodes that were replicated to will exhibit this issue. Example AOR where the registration was serviced (options pings should come from this host, and do, and flow as expected) ``` { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "Domain": "location", "Size": 1024, "AoRs": [{ "Info": { "AoR": "example_user(a)example.com", "HashID": -1389656423, "Contacts": [{ "Contact": { "Address": "sip:example_user@212.2.172.228:39808;rinstance=ed8aa63e90f53e97;transport=UDP", "Expires": 66, "Q": -1, "Call-ID": "wE-GD4GzkrtuDAJUBJf1Jg..", "CSeq": 58, "User-Agent": "Z 3.15.40006 rv2.8.20", "Received": "sip:212.2.172.228:39808", "Path": "<sip:10.7.0.186:5062;lr;received=sip:212.2.172.228:39808>", "State": "CS_NEW", "Flags": 0, "CFlags": 64, "Socket": "udp:10.7.0.190:5060", "Methods": -1, "Ruid": "uloc-2-59fa1f9d-714-17", "Instance": "[not set]", "Reg-Id": 0, "Last-Keepalive": 1509615136, "Last-Modified": 1509615136 } }] } } ], "Stats": { "Records": 1, "Max-Slots": 1 } }, "id": 4836 } ``` example AOR of the above registration on a registrar that was replicated to by dmq/dmq_usrloc, ideally these AOR's should not be pinged at all, but, currently they do, but, in this case, when they do get ping'd, they do not use the socket as defined in the "force_socket" parameter. ``` { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "Domain": "location", "Size": 1024, "AoRs": [{ "Info": { "AoR": "example_user(a)example.com", "HashID": -1389656423, "Contacts": [{ "Contact": { "Address": "sip:example_user@212.2.172.228:39808;rinstance=ed8aa63e90f53e97;transport=UDP", "Expires": 69, "Q": -1, "Call-ID": "wE-GD4GzkrtuDAJUBJf1Jg..", "CSeq": 91, "User-Agent": "Z 3.15.40006 rv2.8.20", "Received": "sip:212.2.172.228:39808", "Path": "<sip:10.7.0.186:5062;lr;received=sip:212.2.172.228:39808>", "State": "CS_NEW", "Flags": 2, "CFlags": 64, "Socket": "[not set]", "Methods": -1, "Ruid": "uloc-2-59fa1f9d-714-17", "Instance": "[not set]", "Reg-Id": 0, "Last-Keepalive": 1509617664, "Last-Modified": 1509617664 } }] } } ], "Stats": { "Records": 1, "Max-Slots": 1 } }, "id": 4571 } ``` #### Log Messages There are no apparent error messages in the logs relating to this that I can see. #### SIP Traffic Here you can clearly see that the OPTIONS message is being sent over the "10.6.0.189" interface when the modules "force_socket" parameter is set to "10.7.0.189:5060" ``` U 2017/11/02 08:37:59.426608 10.6.0.189:5060 -> 10.7.0.186:5062 OPTIONS sip:example_user@212.2.172.228:39808;rinstance=ed8aa63e90f53e97;transport=UDP SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.6.0.189:5060;branch=z9hG4bK8416926. Route: <sip:10.7.0.186:5062;lr;received=sip:212.2.172.228:39808>. From: sip:keepalive@example.com;tag=uloc-2-59fa1f9d-714-17-9968b2da-13812ff4. To: sip:example_user@212.2.172.228:39808;rinstance=ed8aa63e90f53e97;transport=UDP. Call-ID: c0cec5f7-555ac383-68bb313(a)10.6.0.189. CSeq: 1 OPTIONS. Content-Length: 0. . U 2017/11/02 08:38:19.431937 10.6.0.189:5060 -> 10.7.0.186:5062 OPTIONS sip:example_user@212.2.172.228:39808;rinstance=ed8aa63e90f53e97;transport=UDP SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.6.0.189:5060;branch=z9hG4bK8345318. Route: <sip:10.7.0.186:5062;lr;received=sip:212.2.172.228:39808>. From: sip:keepalive@example.com;tag=uloc-2-59fa1f9d-714-17-9968b2da-23812ff4. To: sip:example_user@212.2.172.228:39808;rinstance=ed8aa63e90f53e97;transport=UDP. Call-ID: c0cec5f7-655ac383-a9bb313(a)10.6.0.189. CSeq: 1 OPTIONS. Content-Length: 0. . ``` ### Possible Solutions Unknown ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.0.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 10:57:22 Oct 26 2017 with gcc 4.8.5 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) Linux localhost 3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 20 20:32:50 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1298

6 years, 3 months

[kamailio/kamailio] http_async_client frees pointer twice(Kamailio 5.0.4) (#1340)

by arik

### Description When using http_async_client, I'm getting the following error: Nov 28 08:18:49 tm-kamailio-ingress kamailio[24612]: 3(24635) : <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:483]: qm_free(): BUG: qm_free: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f62e75130c0), called from http_async_client: async_http.c: set_query_params(616), first free http_async_client: async_http.h: free_async_query(142) - aborting  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction route[REQUEST_PERMISSIONS] { $var(body) = 0; jansson_set("string", "from", "$fU", "$var(body)"); jansson_set("string", "to", "$tU", "$var(body)"); $http_req(all) = $null; $http_req(method) = "POST"; $http_req(hdr) = "Content-Type: application/json"; $http_req(hdr) = "Accept: application/json"; $http_req(hdr) = "Connection: keep-alive"; $http_req(body) = $var(body); $var(re_url)= "localhost:3000/v1/mock/makeCall"; if (http_async_query("$var(re_url)", "REQUEST_PERMISSIONS_REPLY") < 0) { t_reply("500", "Server Internal Error"); exit; } }  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1340

6 years, 4 months

[kamailio/kamailio] [Low Priority] Minor build warnings with gcc-7.2.1-2.fc27.x86_64 (#1325)

by Anthony Messina

Getting prepared for the next set of builds with an updated Fedora 27 system using gcc-7.2.1-2.fc27.x86_64, the following are the warnings dumped out. Feel free to close if this isn't important. I am not reporting that any of these create issues in my running Kamailio instance. ``` rtpengine.c: In function 'add_rtpengine_socks': rtpengine.c:778:24: warning: comparison between pointer and zero character constant [-Wpointer-compare] if (p1 != NULL && p1 != '\0') { ^~ rtpengine.c:778:21: note: did you mean to dereference the pointer? if (p1 != NULL && p1 != '\0') { ``` ``` libsms_modem.c: In function 'initmodem': libsms_modem.c:230:36: warning: '%s' directive writing up to 128 bytes into a region of size 91 [-Wformat-overflow=] clen=sprintf(command,"AT+CPIN=\"%s\"\r",mdm->pin); ^~ libsms_modem.c:230:8: note: 'sprintf' output between 12 and 140 bytes into a destination of size 100 clen=sprintf(command,"AT+CPIN=\"%s\"\r",mdm->pin); ``` ``` xhttp_rpc_fnc.c:188:18: warning: 'XHTTP_RPC_Post_1a' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_RPC_Post_1a = str_init("\n"\ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ xhttp_rpc_fnc.c:176:18: warning: 'XHTTP_RPC_ATTR_VAL_SEPARATOR' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_RPC_ATTR_VAL_SEPARATOR = str_init("="); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ xhttp_rpc_fnc.c:175:18: warning: 'XHTTP_RPC_ATTR_SEPARATOR' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_RPC_ATTR_SEPARATOR = str_init(" "); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ xhttp_rpc_fnc.c:174:18: warning: 'XHTTP_RPC_NODE_SEPARATOR' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_RPC_NODE_SEPARATOR = str_init(":: "); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ``` ``` uac_reg.c: In function 'reg_ht_add': uac_reg.c:558:81: warning: ?: using integer constants in boolean context [-Wint-in-bool-context] uac_reg.c:502:13: p = p + ((bsize)?(bsize):(dst)->len) + 1; \ ~~~~~~~ uac_reg.c:558:81: reg_copy_shm(&nr->callid, &str_empty, reg_keep_callid ? UAC_REG_TM_CALLID_SIZE : 0); uac_reg.c:502:14: note: in definition of macro 'reg_copy_shm' p = p + ((bsize)?(bsize):(dst)->len) + 1; \ ^~~~~ ``` ``` cr_fifo.c:64:12: warning: 'get_fifo_opts' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function] static int get_fifo_opts(str * buf, fifo_opt_t * opts, unsigned int opt_set[]); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ cr_fifo.c:66:12: warning: 'update_route_data' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function] static int update_route_data(fifo_opt_t * opts); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cr_fifo.c:753:12: warning: 'update_route_data_recursor' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int update_route_data_recursor(struct dtrie_node_t *node, str * act_domain, fifo_opt_t * opts) { ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cr_fifo.c:78:12: warning: 'str_toklen' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int str_toklen(str * str, const char * delims) ^~~~~~~~~~ ``` ``` authorize.c:158:12: warning: 'get_ha1' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int get_ha1(struct username* _username, str* _domain, ^~~~~~~ ``` ``` java_msgobj.c: In function 'fill_sipmsg_object': java_msgobj.c:88:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetIntField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetIntField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, msg->id); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:88:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:103:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetIntField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetIntField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, msg->pid); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c: In function 'java_exec': java_iface.c:193:48: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->NewLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] invk_method_ref = (*env)->NewLocalRef(env, invk_method); ^~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:193:48: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:193:21: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] invk_method_ref = (*env)->NewLocalRef(env, invk_method); ^ java_iface.c:197:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->DeleteLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->DeleteLocalRef(env, invk_method_ref); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:197:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:206:32: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->MonitorEnter' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] if ((*env)->MonitorEnter(env, invk_method_ref) != JNI_OK) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:206:32: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:228:34: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->DeleteLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->DeleteLocalRef(env, invk_method_ref); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:228:34: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:229:34: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->DeleteLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->DeleteLocalRef(env, invk_method); ^~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:229:34: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:251:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->DeleteLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->DeleteLocalRef(env, invk_method_ref); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:251:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:252:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->DeleteLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->DeleteLocalRef(env, invk_method); ^~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:252:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:260:31: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->MonitorExit' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] if ((*env)->MonitorExit(env, invk_method_ref) != JNI_OK) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:260:31: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:266:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->DeleteLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->DeleteLocalRef(env, invk_method_ref); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:266:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_iface.c:267:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->DeleteLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->DeleteLocalRef(env, invk_method); ^~~~~~~~~~~ java_iface.c:267:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_msgobj.c:103:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' app_java_mod.c: In function 'child_init': java_msgobj.c:119:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetObjectField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetObjectField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, jStrParam); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:119:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' app_java_mod.c:230:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->DeleteLocalRef' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->DeleteLocalRef(env, child_init_id); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_native_methods.c: In function 'Java_org_siprouter_SipMsg_ParseSipMsg': java_native_methods.c:478:12: warning: return from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] return fill_sipmsg_object(jenv, msg); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:136:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetObjectField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetObjectField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, jStrParam); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:136:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:153:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetObjectField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetObjectField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, jStrParam); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ app_java_mod.c:230:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'jmethodID {aka struct _jmethodID *}' java_msgobj.c:153:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:169:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetIntField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetIntField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, msg->len); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:169:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:185:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetObjectField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetObjectField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, jStrParam); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:185:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:202:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetObjectField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetObjectField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, jStrParam); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:202:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:218:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetIntField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetIntField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, msg->parsed_orig_ruri_ok); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:218:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:234:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetObjectField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetObjectField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, jStrParam); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:234:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:250:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetIntField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetIntField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, msg->add_to_branch_len); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:250:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:265:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetIntField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetIntField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, msg->hash_index); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:265:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:280:30: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetIntField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetIntField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, msg->msg_flags); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:280:30: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:296:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetObjectField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetObjectField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, jStrParam); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:296:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' java_msgobj.c:313:33: warning: passing argument 2 of '(*env)->SetObjectField' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] (*env)->SetObjectField(env, SipMsgInstance, fid, jStrParam); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ java_msgobj.c:313:33: note: expected 'jobject {aka struct _jobject *}' but argument is of type 'struct _jobject **' ``` ``` mongodb_dbase.c: In function 'db_mongodb_query': mongodb_dbase.c:922:2: warning: 'mongoc_collection_find' is deprecated: Use mongoc_collection_find_with_opts instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations] mgcon->cursor = mongoc_collection_find (mgcon->collection, ^~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/libmongoc-1.0/mongoc-client.h:28:0, from /usr/include/libmongoc-1.0/mongoc.h:28, from mongodb_connection.h:26, from mongodb_dbase.c:27: /usr/include/libmongoc-1.0/mongoc-collection.h:145:1: note: declared here mongoc_collection_find (mongoc_collection_t *collection, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ``` ``` mongodb_client.c: In function 'mongodbc_exec_cmd': mongodb_client.c:290:4: warning: 'mongoc_collection_find' is deprecated: Use mongoc_collection_find_with_opts instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations] rpl->cursor = mongoc_collection_find (rpl->collection, ^~~ In file included from /usr/include/libmongoc-1.0/mongoc-client.h:28:0, from /usr/include/libmongoc-1.0/mongoc.h:28, from mongodb_client.h:25, from mongodb_client.c:34: /usr/include/libmongoc-1.0/mongoc-collection.h:145:1: note: declared here mongoc_collection_find (mongoc_collection_t *collection, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ``` ``` subscribe.c: In function 'reply_200': subscribe.c:340:6: warning: unused variable 'len' [-Wunused-variable] int len; ^~~ ``` ``` In file included from /usr/include/python2.7/pyconfig.h:6:0, from /usr/include/python2.7/Python.h:8, from apy_kemi_export.c:30: /usr/include/python2.7/pyconfig-64.h:1202:0: warning: "_POSIX_C_SOURCE" redefined #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200112L In file included from /usr/include/bits/libc-header-start.h:33:0, from /usr/include/stdio.h:27, from apy_kemi_export.c:26: /usr/include/features.h:260:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition # define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L ``` ``` In file included from /usr/include/python2.7/pyconfig.h:6:0, from /usr/include/python2.7/Python.h:8, from apy_kemi.c:25: /usr/include/python2.7/pyconfig-64.h:1202:0: warning: "_POSIX_C_SOURCE" redefined #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200112L In file included from /usr/include/bits/libc-header-start.h:33:0, from /usr/include/stdio.h:27, from apy_kemi.c:21: /usr/include/features.h:260:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition # define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L ``` ``` sterman.c: In function 'extract_avp': sterman.c:77:60: warning: comparison between pointer and zero character constant [-Wpointer-compare] if (!q && p == vp->strvalue && vp->strvalue+sizeof(char) != '\0' ) { ^~ sterman.c:77:34: note: did you mean to dereference the pointer? if (!q && p == vp->strvalue && vp->strvalue+sizeof(char) != '\0' ) { ``` ``` xhttp_pi_fnc.c:358:18: warning: 'XHTTP_PI_CODE_2' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_PI_CODE_2 = str_init("</pre>"); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ xhttp_pi_fnc.c:357:18: warning: 'XHTTP_PI_CODE_1' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_PI_CODE_1 = str_init("<pre>"); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ xhttp_pi_fnc.c:356:18: warning: 'XHTTP_PI_BREAK' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_PI_BREAK = str_init("<br/>"); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ xhttp_pi_fnc.c:352:18: warning: 'XHTTP_PI_NODE_SEPARATOR' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_PI_NODE_SEPARATOR = str_init(":: "); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ xhttp_pi_fnc.c:351:18: warning: 'XHTTP_PI_NODE_INDENT' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_PI_NODE_INDENT = str_init("\t"); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ xhttp_pi_fnc.c:348:18: warning: 'XHTTP_PI_SEMICOLON' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const str XHTTP_PI_SEMICOLON = str_init(" : "); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ``` ``` xode.c: In function 'xode_get_tag': xode.c:346:77: warning: comparison between pointer and zero character constant [-Wpointer-compare] if(parent == NULL || parent->firstchild == NULL || name == NULL || name == '\0') return NULL; ^~ xode.c:346:72: note: did you mean to dereference the pointer? if(parent == NULL || parent->firstchild == NULL || name == NULL || name == '\0') return NULL; ^ ``` ``` xstream.c: In function '_xode_put_expatattribs': xstream.c:34:20: warning: comparison between pointer and zero character constant [-Wpointer-compare] while (atts[i] != '\0') ^~ xstream.c:34:12: note: did you mean to dereference the pointer? while (atts[i] != '\0') ^ xode_from.c: In function '_xode_put_expatattribs': xode_from.c:35:20: warning: comparison between pointer and zero character constant [-Wpointer-compare] while (atts[i] != '\0') ^~ xode_from.c:35:12: note: did you mean to dereference the pointer? while (atts[i] != '\0') ^ ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1325

6 years, 4 months

[kamailio/kamailio] pkg/kamailio: Created Makefile for RPM packaging (#1347)

by sergey-safarov

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1347 -- Commit Summary -- * pkg/kamailio: Created Makefile for RPM packaging -- File Changes -- A pkg/kamailio/Makefile (25) A pkg/kamailio/README.md (12) M pkg/kamailio/obs/kamailio.spec (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1347.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1347.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1347

6 years, 4 months

Releasing Kamailio v5.1.0

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, with no relevant new bugs reported lately, it is time to fix the date for releasing next major version, respectively Kamailio v5.1.0. I am proposing Monday, December 11, 2018, as the release date for v5.1.0, with a fallback option to next day, if a bit of time is still needed. Currently there are ongoing efforts to make rpm packaging a first class citizen via docker and obs, credits to Sergey Safarov for it, and get (auto-generated) reference list of Kemi functions, credits to Samuel Förnes for it. In the next two weeks, they can get in good shape and also do a bit more testing as well as update relevant tutorials. Regarding Kemi exports, if you are using a module, check the master branch version to see if it has any sr_kemi_t exports, if not, report it in the case you want to try using the new config framework that allows reloading routing logic script without restart (you will have to use Lua, JavaScript or Squirrel scripting). And of course, if you are aware of any problem not yet reported to the bug tracker, open an issue as soon as possible to allow time to try to fix it before the release: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

6 years, 4 months

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
49
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev November 2017