Hello from North Carolina where SIPit starts tomorrow!
Reading through the docs on the app_* modules I wonder how the GPLv2 is handled here. By default, GPL is sticky, so any module linked in to Kamailio will be GPL-licensed.
With app_mono, precompiled binaries are executed within Kamailio, but not "linked in" to the core. The question here is if we have a clear distinction here. If someone developes a Kamailio-based appliance and sells it - would the customer have the right to app_mono modules under the GPL?
What about python, java and Lua? I don't think these environments precompile, but they still execute within a GPL environment.
I think we need a clear statement about this in the README, like Asterisk has for AMI/AGI applications.
Greetings!
/O
Hi!
I read the documentation and searched through the archives but I couldn't
find an answer to this question. I apologize if I missed something.
I'm working on writing a module using Kamailio 3.3. While processing an
INVITE I use t_reply_with_body () and send a 180 (Ringing) response,
t_suspend () the transaction, process a PRACK and try to t_continue () but
I notice the following results:
- The callback I created before t_suspend () receives a TMCB_DESTROY
before the PRACK arrives
- I can use t_continue () but it never returns to the calling routine
I appreciate any guidance you can provide,
Bob
I'm trying to make sure that all Sipdroid contributors are properly recognised for contributions that have ended up in Lumicall.
I understand some developers are active with Kamailio and some of you may know these people.
To properly recognise people in github, Google code SVN user IDs need to be mapped to email addresses associated with github accounts. Google code seems to hide the identities of some contributors by giving them fake Google IDs even if they don't use gmail - so github doesn't recognise them, I have no easy way to contact them and people can't see the contributors' work when looking at that person's github profile.
Would anybody be able to help me complete the list of contributors for this purpose? The list I have already is at:
https://github.com/opentelecoms-org/lumicall/blob/master/authors.txt
Regards,
Daniel
Hello,
it is time to sketch the road to the next major release, my plan is:
- create branch 4.4 on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
- that will unfreeze development, so personal branches and contributions
kept in external repositories can be merged in master branch
- consider to release v4.4.0 in first or second week of March
Any other opinions?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
- http://conference.kamailio.com -
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 8524f32bc07bd121326369f432eb29a257856f41
URL: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=8524f32…
Author: Olle E. Johansson <oej(a)edvina.net>
Committer: Olle E. Johansson <oej(a)edvina.net>
Date: Mon Feb 18 22:36:45 2013 +0100
maxfwd The default value is not 256, it's 16 in the source code.
---
modules/maxfwd/README | 14 +++++++-------
modules/maxfwd/doc/maxfwd_admin.xml | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/maxfwd/README b/modules/maxfwd/README
index 845a855..764f8f5 100644
--- a/modules/maxfwd/README
+++ b/modules/maxfwd/README
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Chapter 1. Admin Guide
MAX-FORWARDS value allowed by RFC 3261. The value can be changed at
runtime.
- Default value is "256".
+ Default value is "16".
Example 1.1. Set max_limit parameter
...
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ modparam("maxfwd", "max_limit", 32)
4.5. maxfwd_at_least(max_value)
4.6. mf_lowlimit(max_value)
-4.1. maxfwd_process(max_value)
+4.1. maxfwd_process(max_value)
If no Max-Forward header is present in the received request, a header
will be added having the original value equal with "max_value". If a
@@ -158,15 +158,15 @@ if (!maxfwd_process("10") && $retcode==-1) {
};
...
-4.2. mf_process_maxfwd_header(max_value)
+4.2. mf_process_maxfwd_header(max_value)
Same as maxfwd_process(max_value).
-4.3. process_maxfwd(max_value)
+4.3. process_maxfwd(max_value)
Same as maxfwd_process(max_value).
-4.4. is_maxfwd_lt(max_value)
+4.4. is_maxfwd_lt(max_value)
Checks if the Max-Forward header value is less then the "max_value"
parameter value. It considers also the value of the new inserted header
@@ -197,10 +197,10 @@ if ( is_maxfwd_lt("1") ) {
};
...
-4.5. maxfwd_at_least(max_value)
+4.5. maxfwd_at_least(max_value)
Same as is_maxfwd_lt(max_value).
-4.6. mf_lowlimit(max_value)
+4.6. mf_lowlimit(max_value)
Same as is_maxfwd_lt(max_value).
diff --git a/modules/maxfwd/doc/maxfwd_admin.xml b/modules/maxfwd/doc/maxfwd_admin.xml
index 5fbdc9f..f0f3463 100644
--- a/modules/maxfwd/doc/maxfwd_admin.xml
+++ b/modules/maxfwd/doc/maxfwd_admin.xml
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
</para>
<para>
<emphasis>
- Default value is <quote>256</quote>.
+ Default value is <quote>16</quote>.
</emphasis>
</para>
<example>
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below.
User who did this - Víctor Seva (linuxmaniac)
Attached to Project - sip-router
Summary - app_lua: add rpc reload command
Task Type - Improvement
Category - Module
Status - Unconfirmed
Assigned To -
Operating System - All
Severity - Very Low
Priority - Normal
Reported Version - Development
Due in Version - Undecided
Due Date - Undecided
Details - I've been working in get in app_lua a rpc command to been able to reload the script loaded at runtime.
This is my first experience writing stuff for kamailio, so comments and improvements are welcome.
One or more files have been attached.
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=270
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.