3 Dec
2020
3 Dec
'20
10:11 a.m.
### Description
I'm using htable DMQ replication to relicate call details over kamailio nodes.
I've noticed that htable items are not removed when sht_rm_name is called inside
script
### Troubleshooting
#### Reproduction
put in script:
```
$sht(cidParam=>$ci::callee_socket) = $sas;
sht_rm_name("cidParam", "sw", "$ci");
```
make a call and see what gets replicated
`ngrep -W byline -d any '"htname":"cidParam"' | grep action
`
When htable item is removed from htable using CLI removal it's replicated
`{"action":3,"htname":"cidParam","cname":"x","mode":0}.
`
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
```
version: kamailio 5.4.1 (x86_64/linux) 09fd6a
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY,
USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535,
DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 09fd6a
compiled on 11:07:49 Sep 1 2020 with gcc 4.8.5
```
* **Operating System**:
CentOS7
```
Linux 3.10.0-1127.18.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 26 15:27:06 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
GNU/Linux
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2573
3 Dec
3 Dec
1:54 p.m.
Only `re` operation was replicated. I pushed a commit in master to replicate `sw`, test
and see if works as expected.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2573#issuecomment-737951550
8 Dec
8 Dec
10:20 a.m.
Hi Dan,
No luck. I did cherry-pick to local 5.4.1 but this should not change anything.
Pre call:
```
node 0
[root@v0p1356-dispatcher htable]# kamcmd htable.dump cidParam
[root@v0p1356-dispatcher htable]#
node1
[root@V0P1376-dispatcher-02 htable]# kamcmd htable.dump cidParam
[root@V0P1376-dispatcher-02 htable]#
```
make a call on node0
```
[root@v0p1356-dispatcher htable]# ngrep -W byline -d any htab |grep actio
{"action":2,"htname":"cidParam","cname":"6d9eed7818bab5bb4b607ece7c329c83@10.3.96.231:5060::callee_socket","type":2,"strval":"udp:10.3.96.231:5060","mode":1}2.(...<D._c.1...
{"action":2,"htname":"prefixParam","cname":"record::007815","type":0,"intval":0,"mode":1}ccig.pl....<D._.
{"action":2,"htname":"cidParam","cname":"6d9eed7818bab5bb4b607ece7c329c83@10.3.96.231:5060::init","type":0,"intval":1,"mode":1}
...<D._.0U.....
{"action":2,"htname":"cidParam","cname":"6d9eed7818bab5bb4b607ece7c329c83@10.3.96.231:5060::reinvited","type":0,"intval":1,"mode":1}<L.....BD._Y....
{"action":2,"htname":"cidParam","cname":"6d9eed7818bab5bb4b607ece7c329c83@10.3.96.231:5060::reinvited","type":0,"intval":1,"mode":1}.0.....JD._...1.
{"action":6,"htname":"cidParam","type":2,"strval":,"mode":0}w..j....JD._..,4
{"action":6,"htname":"cidParam","type":2,"strval":,"mode":0}.F.....p..39.Y}.
```
post call on node0
```
[root@v0p1356-dispatcher htable]# kamcmd htable.dump cidParam
[root@v0p1356-dispatcher htable]#
```
post call on node1
```
[root@V0P1376-dispatcher-02 htable]# kamcmd htable.dump cidParam
{
entry: 228814
size: 1
slot: {
{
name:
6d9eed7818bab5bb4b607ece7c329c83@10.3.96.231:5060::callee_socket
value: udp:10.3.96.231:5060
type: str
}
}
}
{
entry: 745232
size: 1
slot: {
{
name:
6d9eed7818bab5bb4b607ece7c329c83@10.3.96.231:5060::reinvited
value: 1
type: int
}
}
}
{
entry: 1027817
size: 1
slot: {
{
name: 6d9eed7818bab5bb4b607ece7c329c83@10.3.96.231:5060::init
value: 1
type: int
}
}
}
[root@V0P1376-dispatcher-02 htable]#
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2573#issuecomment-740494743
11:34 a.m.
Dicovered that the value was not set for the replication operation in this case. I just
pushed another commit to htable module to fix it, can you try it?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2573#issuecomment-740536383
11:41 a.m.
Hi Dan,
Works fine. I've tested it backporting on 5.4.1.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2573#issuecomment-740539708
11:42 a.m.
One more thing,
Seems
`kamcmd htable.flush <table_name>`
is not replicted too - is it intended?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2573#issuecomment-740540709
9 Dec
9 Dec
12:32 p.m.
Yes, RPC commands were targeting the administrative commands and if they didn't use
internally other runtime operations, they were not replicated. Now, of course, new
features can be added over the time, the best via pull requests.
Closing this one, the commits added what was requested.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2573#issuecomment-741713834
12:32 p.m.
Closed #2573.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2573#event-4089468169
1241
days inactive
1247
days old
7 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
marcinkowalczyk