THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#60 - kamailio 3.0.x: segfault in carrierroute User who did this - Ovidiu Sas (osas) ---------- With the new core (in kamailio 3.0) the AVPs are handled a little bit different then kamailio 1.x. I remember some discussions about how to handle string versus integer AVPs, but I don't remember all the details. I prefer to use int AVPs (my understanding - in kamailio 1.5 - was that int AVPs were faster then str AVPs). Maybe Daniel or Andrei can shed more light on this issue. Thanks, Ovidiu ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=60#comment73 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.