Feature Requests item #1891148, was opened at 2008-02-11 05:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743023&aid=189114… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: ver devel Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Helmut Kuper (hekuper) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: protection of open fifo/ socket files against removing Initial Comment: Hi, I found that starting a 2nd openser with same config as an already running openser on same machine using module mi_datagram leads to a deletion of the socket file of the already running openser process. This is very bad when u use openser as a frontend for sems for example. :( If this is a bug, maybe the check, whether there is an already running openser using same network resources, should be placed *befor* starting modules. Alternative modules should be able to handle those problematic scenarios ... My mi_datagram config is this: loadmodule "mi_datagram.so" modparam("mi_datagram", "socket_name", "/tmp/openser_ansagen_sock") modparam("mi_datagram", "children_count", 1) modparam("mi_datagram", "unix_socket_mode", 0660) modparam("mi_datagram", "unix_socket_group", "voip") modparam("mi_datagram", "unix_socket_user", "ruth") modparam("mi_datagram", "socket_timeout", 2000) regards Helmut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2012-08-26 01:24 Message: Hey there this is kind of of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I'm starting a blog soon but have no coding expertise so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated! http://www.sunglasses4summer.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Henning Westerholt (henningw) Date: 2008-07-08 06:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=337916 Originator: NO Hi all, the problem with checking the existence of the fifo/ socket is that the old file is not deleted during the shutdown. Even if we change this then the problem would be still present in the event of a server crash. As Helmut aggreed that this can be closed, i've moved this to the feature request section. The startup code in main.c could be modified to check for available network resources before doing the module initialization to achieve this functionality. Cheers, Henning ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ovidiu Sas (osas) Date: 2008-02-12 07:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1395524 Originator: NO It happened to me too. I wanted to check the version of openser and instead of running 'openser -V' I ran 'openser -v' and my fifo file was gone. Maybe a quick fix would be to check the existence of the fifo file. If exists, exit with an error, if not, proceed as normal. Just my 2c. Regards, Ovidiu sas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-02-12 07:53 Message: Logged In: NO Hi, well, I agree too. This is an operation error by admin. But it is annoying that it is so easy to destroy the media server. This will quit often occurs if you are using bash shell with command history combined with nervous fingers ;) ... I think that checking network resources in openser befor doing rest of configuration is safer. It should work allways, cause no second openser will user same address and port on same machine at same time. On the other Hand saving the PID of first openser in a PID should be an acceptable work around. So we can close this case if you want. regards Helmut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-02-12 07:40 Message: Logged In: NO is it possible to delete a FIFO which is currently used? E.g by mistake I start openser a second time. If it deletes the FIFO then it may cause problems to the current running openser instance. klaus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-12 05:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Henning, I agree here - the fix should not be in openser, but rather in whatever scripts/admins are managing openser. From my point of view, this is a openser operation error. Regards, Bogdan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Henning Westerholt (henningw) Date: 2008-02-12 03:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=337916 Originator: NO I think this can be fixed by other means: Just add some checks to openserctl to not start openser two times, like the init script does (i think). This would be easier than to fix the OpenSER start process to not start at all (or fail just in the beginning) if another process is already running. Henning ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-12 03:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Helmut, This is the normal/expected bahviour of the module - to avoid any security problems (using a fake or malicious already existing unixsocket) openser removes it first (if exists) and then creates its own with proper permissions and security restrictions. So, it is not a bug :). Regards, Bogdan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Helmut Kuper (hekuper) Date: 2008-02-11 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1851349 Originator: YES Hi Bogdan, yes I use same socket file name for both opensers, cause both are using same config file. Befor we misunderstand: I don't want to run 2 opensers with same config on same machine!! I rather strumbled about that bug/problem, when I accidently started same openser without openserctl twice ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-11 06:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Helmut, so you use the same socket_name for both openser's ?? Regards, Bogdan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743023&aid=189114…