26 Mar
2010
26 Mar
'10
8:03 p.m.
Hello,
I propose to merge the users mailing lists, most of the traffic these
days is about 3.0 and even there are 2 stables branches now, they are
sync'ed, so same code more or less. For 3.1 will be one stable branch,
falvor selection will be only a matter of make command.
Lately common useful topics are discussed on those different mailing
lists, notifications and knowledge base building require cross-posting,
lot of overhead imo.
Any other opinion?
Like with devel mailing lists, existing email addresses for users ML can
still be used, just that end on same ML. Natural choice will be to have
users@kamailio and serusers@iptel to be directed to
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/
27 Mar
27 Mar
10:02 a.m.
New subject: [SR-Users] merging users mailing lists
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Like with devel mailing lists, existing email
addresses for users ML can
still be used, just that end on same ML. Natural choice will be to have
users@kamailio and serusers@iptel to be directed to
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
sounds good to me, juha
11:47 a.m.
On Mar 26, 2010 at 20:03, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I propose to merge the users mailing lists, most of the traffic these
days is about 3.0 and even there are 2 stables branches now, they are
sync'ed, so same code more or less. For 3.1 will be one stable branch,
falvor selection will be only a matter of make command.
Lately common useful topics are discussed on those different mailing
lists, notifications and knowledge base building require cross-posting,
lot of overhead imo.
Any other opinion?
Like with devel mailing lists, existing email addresses for users ML can
still be used, just that end on same ML. Natural choice will be to have
users@kamailio and serusers@iptel to be directed to
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
I think it's a good ideea.
Andrei
5:13 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] merging users mailing lists
I am opposed to this. I think there is a large base of Kamailio users
that does not wish to get mired in larger discussions about
SER-compatible modes of using sip-router and other things of that nature.
On 03/27/2010 05:02 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
Tel : +1 678-954-0670
Direct : +1 678-954-0671
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Like with devel mailing lists, existing email
addresses for users ML can
still be used, just that end on same ML. Natural choice will be to have
users@kamailio and serusers@iptel to be directed to
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
sounds good to me, juha
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users 
5:23 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Users] [Kamailio-Users] merging users mailing lists
2010/3/27 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
I am opposed to this. I think there is a large base
of Kamailio users that
does not wish to get mired in larger discussions about SER-compatible modes
of using sip-router and other things of that nature.
The merging proposal is good but perhaps it should take place later.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
8:19 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] merging users mailing lists
On 3/27/10 5:23 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/3/27 Alex
Balashov<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
ok, I will do it 10 minutes later ;-)
The proposal resulted looking at discussions on the mailing lists and
feedback I accumulated during last month travelings. We direct new the
people looking at our project to three different places for discussions
about stable releases and the source code is more or less the same. What
is on sr-users is definitely important for k and s users as well.
Surprisingly, even for me, the integration done last year had fantastic
outcome and the differences between flavours are not radical. I tried to
summarize on the page:
http://sip-router.org/kamailio-release/
Moreover, the best for our community users is having access to all
developers. We share now code that was developed by the other project
during 2005-2008 and we tend to stay focused on just one users mailing
list, neglecting the others.
I think we can sort out better the issues in one mailing list and
everyone is sure will get the best answer since all devels and users
will have focus in a single place. In addition, the discussions about
differences existing now will create the necessary pressure to document
properly or find a better solution.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/
* http://twitter.com/miconda
* http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
I am opposed to this. I think there is a large
base of Kamailio users that
does not wish to get mired in larger discussions about SER-compatible modes
of using sip-router and other things of that nature.
The merging proposal is good but perhaps it should take place later.
28 Mar
28 Mar
6:52 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] merging users mailing lists
Daniel-
On 3/27/10 5:23 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Agree. If you want to continue to build critical mass for your software and your
community, you should definitely
have fewer lists, not more. Serious participants have no trouble to filter out posts that
are not of interest or
don't affect them (or they don't understand). But serious participants hate to
miss things important to them just
because it did not appear on "their" list.
-Jeff
2010/3/27 Alex
Balashov<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
ok, I will do it 10 minutes later ;-)
The proposal resulted looking at discussions on the mailing lists and
feedback I accumulated during last month travelings. We direct new the
people looking at our project to three different places for discussions
about stable releases and the source code is more or less the same. What
is on sr-users is definitely important for k and s users as well.
Surprisingly, even for me, the integration done last year had fantastic
outcome and the differences between flavours are not radical. I tried to
summarize on the page:
http://sip-router.org/kamailio-release/
Moreover, the best for our community users is having access to all
developers. We share now code that was developed by the other project
during 2005-2008 and we tend to stay focused on just one users mailing
list, neglecting the others.
I think we can sort out better the issues in one mailing list and
everyone is sure will get the best answer since all devels and users
will have focus in a single place. In addition, the discussions about
differences existing now will create the necessary pressure to document
properly or find a better solution. I am opposed to this. I think there is a large
base of Kamailio users that
does not wish to get mired in larger discussions about SER-compatible modes
of using sip-router and other things of that nature.
The merging proposal is good but perhaps it should take place later.
8 Apr
8 Apr
10:42 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] merging users mailing lists
Hello,
a final reminder for users mailing lists merging...
If nothing else against appears, I will merge users list to sr-users
over the weekend. You can continue posting to existing mailing lists
addresses, it will work, just that messages will end up on the same place.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 3/28/10 6:52 AM, Jeff Brower wrote:
Daniel-
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/ *
http://twitter.com/miconda *
http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
On 3/27/10 5:23 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Agree. If you want to continue to build critical mass for your software and
your community, you should definitely
have fewer lists, not more. Serious participants have no trouble to filter out posts
that are not of interest or
don't affect them (or they don't understand). But serious participants hate to
miss things important to them just
because it did not appear on "their" list.
-Jeff
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
2010/3/27 Alex
Balashov<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
ok, I will do it 10 minutes later ;-)
The proposal resulted looking at discussions on the mailing lists and
feedback I accumulated during last month travelings. We direct new the
people looking at our project to three different places for discussions
about stable releases and the source code is more or less the same. What
is on sr-users is definitely important for k and s users as well.
Surprisingly, even for me, the integration done last year had fantastic
outcome and the differences between flavours are not radical. I tried to
summarize on the page:
http://sip-router.org/kamailio-release/
Moreover, the best for our community users is having access to all
developers. We share now code that was developed by the other project
during 2005-2008 and we tend to stay focused on just one users mailing
list, neglecting the others.
I think we can sort out better the issues in one mailing list and
everyone is sure will get the best answer since all devels and users
will have focus in a single place. In addition, the discussions about
differences existing now will create the necessary pressure to document
properly or find a better solution.
I am opposed to this. I think there is a large
base of Kamailio users that
does not wish to get mired in larger discussions about SER-compatible modes
of using sip-router and other things of that nature.
The merging proposal is good but perhaps it should take place later.
10:42 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] merging users mailing lists
Hello,
a final reminder for users mailing lists merging...
If nothing else against appears, I will merge users list to sr-users
over the weekend. You can continue posting to existing mailing lists
addresses, it will work, just that messages will end up on the same place.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 3/28/10 6:52 AM, Jeff Brower wrote:
Daniel-
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/ *
http://twitter.com/miconda *
http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
On 3/27/10 5:23 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Agree. If you want to continue to build critical mass for your software and
your community, you should definitely
have fewer lists, not more. Serious participants have no trouble to filter out posts
that are not of interest or
don't affect them (or they don't understand). But serious participants hate to
miss things important to them just
because it did not appear on "their" list.
-Jeff
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
2010/3/27 Alex
Balashov<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
ok, I will do it 10 minutes later ;-)
The proposal resulted looking at discussions on the mailing lists and
feedback I accumulated during last month travelings. We direct new the
people looking at our project to three different places for discussions
about stable releases and the source code is more or less the same. What
is on sr-users is definitely important for k and s users as well.
Surprisingly, even for me, the integration done last year had fantastic
outcome and the differences between flavours are not radical. I tried to
summarize on the page:
http://sip-router.org/kamailio-release/
Moreover, the best for our community users is having access to all
developers. We share now code that was developed by the other project
during 2005-2008 and we tend to stay focused on just one users mailing
list, neglecting the others.
I think we can sort out better the issues in one mailing list and
everyone is sure will get the best answer since all devels and users
will have focus in a single place. In addition, the discussions about
differences existing now will create the necessary pressure to document
properly or find a better solution.
I am opposed to this. I think there is a large
base of Kamailio users that
does not wish to get mired in larger discussions about SER-compatible modes
of using sip-router and other things of that nature.
The merging proposal is good but perhaps it should take place later.
5132
days inactive
5145
days old
8 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Alex Balashov -
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Jeff Brower -
jh＠tutpro.com