Bugs item #2819457, was opened at 2009-07-10 11:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by miconda You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=281945… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: ver 1.5.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Alexandr Dubovikov (baron76) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: dialog module. BYE with bad Cseq. Initial Comment: the dialog module in timeout BYE request send thru tm_module Cseq number from INVITE. dlg_req_within.c: function: dlg_t * build_dlg_t(struct dlg_cell * cell, int dir){ line: td->loc_seq.value = loc_seq; if before final 200 OK, we will recieve PRACK/200 (new Cseq) , the dialog module will send bad Cseq number (loc_seq + 1); Scenario: ----INVITE ( Cseq: 1) -> <--- 183 ( Cseq: 1) ---- ---- PRACK ( Cseq: 3) -> <---- 200 OK ( Cseq: 3) - ---------- timeout ----> ---- BYE ( Cseq: 2) -> <------ 503 (Bad CSeq number) ------- Quickly Solution: td->loc_seq.value = loc_seq + 100; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2009-10-05 10:04 Message: it got met some time :-) -- but majority of dialog module users should decide. Probably the default of dlg matching should be the one that handles all cases properly and definitely the docs should be updated. If there are requests within dialog, the cseq is updated (e.g., update, re-invite). Delicate situation is pre-confirmed dialog. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexandr Dubovikov (baron76) Date: 2009-07-10 17:02 Message: should but didn't. because dlg_onroute check record-route param. If the param is not present, than ignored this message. if ( seq_match_mode!=SEQ_MATCH_NO_ID ) { if( d_rrb.get_route_param( req, &rr_param, &val)!=0) { LM_DBG("Route param '%.*s' not found\n", rr_param.len,rr_param.s); if (seq_match_mode==SEQ_MATCH_STRICT_ID ) return; } default value for dlg_match_mode is 0; so. should works only in dlg_match_mode 2 2 - DID_NONE - the match is done exclusively based on SIP elements; no DID information is added in RR. . so fix should be anyway. Or default value set to 2, or loc_cseq +100 or a notice in the README: "in 100rel mode, use only dlg_match_mode 2. Daniel. you should decide. :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-07-10 16:22 Message: CSeq should be increased in dialog module also for PRACKs. What's the original problem? Is dialog module not able to detect the PRACK as belonging to the dialog? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexandr Dubovikov (baron76) Date: 2009-07-10 16:19 Message: ok, in this case we couldn't remove Require, but can use this solution: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3261.html 8.2.2.3 Require UAC->UAS: INVITE sip:watson@bell-telephone.com SIP/2.0 Require: 100rel UAS->UAC: SIP/2.0 420 Bad Extension Unsupported: 100rel This behavior ensures that the client-server interaction will proceed without delay when all options are understood by both sides, and only slow down if options are not understood (as in the example above). For a well-matched client-server pair, the interaction proceeds quickly, saving a round-trip often required by negotiation mechanisms. In addition, it also removes ambiguity when the client requires features that the server does not understand. Some features, such as call handling fields, are only of interest to end systems. anyway, all ways are posible. But as I told before, just make loc_seq +=100; it will be enougth. Wbr, Alexandr ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Iñaki Baz Castillo (ibc_sf) Date: 2009-07-10 15:37 Message: Imagine that the UAC uses "Require: 100rel" instead of "Supported". The header cannot be removed or the call won't take place. A proxy shouldn't play to be god :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexandr Dubovikov (baron76) Date: 2009-07-10 14:56 Message: and PRACK/200 are not ok in the dialog. But I think, the best solution, set ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexandr Dubovikov (baron76) Date: 2009-07-10 14:55 Message: Hi miconda, much better remove_hf("Supported:") from INVITE request; :-) and PRACK/200 ok in the dialog. But I think, the best solution, set loc_seq +100. P.S. don't forget about UPDATE method. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda) Date: 2009-07-10 14:48 Message: quick fix: reply pracks on server, with sl_send_reply() as they just get into config?!?! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Iñaki Baz Castillo (ibc_sf) Date: 2009-07-10 13:59 Message: This is a good example of why a proxy shouldn't try to behave as a B2BUA XD ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexandr Dubovikov (baron76) Date: 2009-07-10 11:50 Message: oops: Scenario: ----INVITE ( Cseq: 1) -> <--- 183 ( Cseq: 1) ---- ---- PRACK ( Cseq: 3) -> <---- 200 OK ( Cseq: 3 PRACK) - <---- 200 OK ( Cseq: 1 INVITE) - ---------- timeout dialog ----> ---- BYE ( Cseq: 2) -> <------ 503 (Bad CSeq number) ------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=281945…