Hello, the only recent change in the tcp core was resetting a flag to avoid infinite log messages (until connection was closed) via commit d36734d658cd0bcfc8357c7e85ca32da0612aaee . Does it happen often, or you got it just once so far? Cheers, Daniel On 05/10/15 08:29, Jason Penton wrote: Hey guys, Not sure if there have been any changes but I have an interesting problem here when using TCP: *The BT is as follows:* #0 local_timer_list_expire (h=0xa0f128 <tcp_reader_ltimer+178664>, t=723807134, l=0x9e3740 <tcp_reader_ltimer>) at local_timer.c:198 #1 local_timer_expire (t=723807134, h=<optimized out>) at local_timer.c:227 #2 local_timer_run (lt=lt@entry=0x9e3740 <tcp_reader_ltimer>, saved_ticks=723807150) at local_timer.c:250 #3 0x00000000005d8417 in tcp_reader_timer_run () at tcp_read.c:1682 #4 tcp_receive_loop (unix_sock=<optimized out>) at tcp_read.c:1734 #5 0x00000000005c81c8 in tcp_init_children () at tcp_main.c:4788 #6 0x00000000004a9da3 in main_loop () at main.c:1664 #7 0x000000000042411e in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.c:2566 This seems to be related to clearing timers for TCP connections. The crash is related to the following code: *_timer_rm_list(tl)* where it does a null pointer deref on tl->next and tl->prev, which, according to the bt, are null (see below). *(gdb) print *tl* $14 = {next = 0x0, prev = 0x0, expire = 723807134, initial_timeout = 32, data = 0x7fbbb05aa628, f = 0x5d02f0 <tcpconn_read_timeout>, flags = 512, slow_idx = 0} Any ideas? Cheers Jason _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing listsr-dev@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev -- Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Sep 28-30, 2015, in Berlin - http://asipto.com/u/kat _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

It could be some other reason, I will investigate as well. Using any modules on top of tcp (like tcpops, tls or websocket)? Cheers, Daniel On 05/10/15 15:47, Jason Penton wrote: Hey Daniel, Got it once so far... I'll take a look at that commit and see what it did - but very strange indeed. Cheers Jason On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 at 15:42 Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: -- Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Sep 28-30, 2015, in Berlin - http://asipto.com/u/kat

I can confirm this is not related to TLS as I have recreated using TCP only. Here is another BT (it seems the entire tcpconn structure is corrupt).... *(gdb) bt* #0 local_timer_del (h=h@entry=0x99f3a0 <tcp_main_ltimer>, tl=tl@entry=0x7ff3c82ce910) at local_timer.c:178 #1 0x00000000005ad47c in handle_tcpconn_ev (tcpconn=0x7ff3c82ce828, ev=<optimized out>, fd_i=-1) at tcp_main.c:4139 #2 0x00000000005c3e57 in io_wait_loop_epoll (h=<optimized out>, t=<optimized out>, repeat=<optimized out>) at io_wait.h:1061 #3 tcp_main_loop () at tcp_main.c:4481 #4 0x00000000004ab79f in main_loop () at main.c:1672 #5 0x000000000042411e in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.c:2566 (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x00000000005ad47c in handle_tcpconn_ev (tcpconn=0x7ff3c82ce828, ev=<optimized out>, fd_i=-1) at tcp_main.c:4139 4139tcp_main.c: No such file or directory. *(gdb) frame 0* *(gdb) p *tl* $3 = {next = 0x616a1a160109010d, prev = 0x746e65702e6e6f73, expire = 1933602415, initial_timeout = 1701603693, data = 0x6d6f632e736d6f63, f = 0x9060d3022018230, flags = 34346, slow_idx = 34376} Looks like there is corruption.... *(gdb) frame 1* *(gdb) print *tcpconn* $11 = {s = 77, fd = -1, write_lock = {val = 14}, id = 16254464, reader_pid = -2110739197, rcv = {src_ip = {af = 60854530, len = 33685762, u = {addrl = {9667549471699894785, 363385298974377544}, addr32 = { 221250049, 2250901766, 234325576, 84607233}, addr16 = {513, 3376, 2310, 34346, 34376, 3575, 257, 1291}, addr = "\001\002\060\r\006\t*\206H\206\367\r\001\001\v\005"}}, dst_ip = {af = 825700352, len = 101265419, u = {addrl = {5140016830441870595, 312159073630948145}, addr32 = {100947203, 1196753427, 154143537, 72680198}, addr16 = {21763, 1540, 531, 18261, 2865, 2352, 774, 1109}, addr = "\003U\004\006\023\002UG1\v0\t\006\003U\004"}}, src_port = 3080, dst_port = 21762, proto_reserved1 = 806039879, proto_reserved2 = 1426261513, src_su = {s = {sa_family = 1796, sa_data = "\f\002UG1\016\060\f\006\003U\004\n\f"}, sin = {sin_family = 1796, sin_port = 524, sin_addr = {s_addr = 238110549}, sin_zero = "0\f\006\003U\004\n\f"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 1796, sin6_port = 524, sin6_flowinfo = 238110549, sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = "0\f\006\003U\004\n\f\005Smile0\036", __u6_addr16 = {3120, 774, 1109, 3082, 21253, 26989, 25964, 7728}, __u6_addr32 = { 50727984, 201983061, 1768772357, 506488172}}}, sin6_scope_id = 892407063}}, bind_address = 0x3135393034323830, proto = 51 '3'}, req = {next = 0x3331353930333238, buf = 0x9300b317c305a34 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x9300b317c305a34>, start = 0x5502130604550306 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x5502130604550306>, pos = 0x55030609300b3147 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x55030609300b3147>, parsed = 0xe314755020c0804 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xe314755020c0804>, body = 0xc0a045503060c30 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xc0a045503060c30>, b_size = 1768772357, content_len = 623994220, chunk_size = 50733872, flags = 1109, bytes_to_go = 1935896604, error = 1680762467, state = 1663989349}, refcnt = {val = 1818848627}, type = 1836016485, flags = 12155, send_flags = {f = 99 'c', blst_imask = 111 'o'}, state = 808005997, extra_data = 0xf78648862a090627, timer = {next = 0x616a1a160109010d, prev = 0x746e65702e6e6f73, expire = 1933602415, initial_timeout = 1701603693, data = 0x6d6f632e736d6f63, f = 0x9060d3022018230, flags = 34346, slow_idx = 34376}, timeout = 50332929, lifetime = 983426, id_hash = 167871024, id_next = 0xab4698aaf4cd000, id_prev = 0x82f3bd212ad477e1, c_next = 0xfebfadf2e80d476b, c_prev = 0x542ad26c6fff5d01, con_aliases = {{ parent = 0x7ee7daa501f3ec2, next = 0x2564cfdb796faf0b, prev = 0x67075f982b68c22d, port = 26158, hash = 52278}, {parent = 0xa61ccf520173dbcf, next = 0xedfd914bd9290055, prev = 0x4c82e1be15c8e6bd, port = 56482, hash = 35158}, {parent = 0x1dd62e187ab759f8, next = 0x5b9483e3bd60806b, prev = 0x3c0e501ef81ca353, port = 42794, hash = 37520}, {parent = 0xb6c3f82065f2d125, next = 0xa78be2be546e1fb7, prev = 0x7a2f32985edb7215, port = 16490, hash = 49867}, {parent = 0x12bd4ff964ba4650, next = 0x7f071da522484c27, prev = 0x949f60e68638512f, port = 26169, hash = 41924}, {parent = 0x60a5d1aac5486cb5, next = 0xfa82965a57bf2ff6, prev = 0x7121974cf7f338d5, port = 64152, hash = 31481}, {parent = 0xbe418ec01629988f, next = 0x57a216f873989cb5, prev = 0x8dceabdc4ec9c171, port = 55564, hash = 38148}, { parent = 0x7ba30100010302ef, next = 0x1d55030609307930, prev = 0x62c300030020413, port = 24585, hash = 18566}, {parent = 0x704f1d161f040d01, next = 0x6547204c53536e65, prev = 0x206465746172656e, port = 25923, hash = 29810}, {parent = 0x5503061d30657461, next = 0xb4f5140416040e1d, prev = 0xb4484ad4fb6fc4a5, port = 45712, hash = 7028}, {parent = 0x1d5503061f30883e, next = 0xf714801630180423, prev = 0xf2ba7396fd05170d, port = 24267, hash = 6103}, {parent = 0x2a09060d30f186cf, next = 0xb01010df7864886, prev = 0x8f00010182030005, port = 51556, hash = 28499}}, aliases = 672183753, wbuf_q = { first = 0x5b7bf0e590790cf6, last = 0x67d25b5f6e53d679, wr_timeout = 1518084272, queued = 3564629620, offset = 996062876, last_used = 950886522}} On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 at 15:56 Jason Penton &lt;jason.penton(a)gmail.com <mailto:jason.penton@gmail.com>> wrote: Hey Daniel Using TLS only. not using tcpops nor websocket On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 at 15:54 Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: It could be some other reason, I will investigate as well. Using any modules on top of tcp (like tcpops, tls or websocket)? Cheers, Daniel On 05/10/15 15:47, Jason Penton wrote: -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Sep 28-30, 2015, in Berlin - http://asipto.com/u/kat

No, not stress testing at all.... I can't reproduce it on request - but let me add the mem debugging and see how we go...