21 Apr
2016
21 Apr
'16
10:19 a.m.
1. Get set by id uses loop instead of recursion
2. All other routines that used to iterate over the list are re-factored to trace the tree
recursively.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578
-- Commit Summary --
* dispatcher: use avl-tree for ds_set indexing
-- File Changes --
M modules/dispatcher/dispatch.c (873)
M modules/dispatcher/dispatch.h (13)
M modules/dispatcher/dispatcher.c (215)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578.patch
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578.diff
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578
6 May
6 May
2:36 p.m.
@miconda any updates on this PR?
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-217457326
7 May
7 May
7:04 a.m.
The patch is really big and I didn't have time to analyze it properly. I expect to do
it after the Kamailio World, till then it is no much spare time, next week it's also
the release of 4.4.1.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-217612439
20 Jun
20 Jun
7:01 a.m.
Due to lots of changes at the foundation of indexing the destinations, I am thinking of
making a new module with your patch in order to be able to compare for a while the results
between the two. I all looks ok, then we may just keep one.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-227064548
10:28 a.m.
Sure. Sounds good.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-227106116
19 Jul
19 Jul
4:18 p.m.
Any updates on this? I would really like to finish with char* pool id's.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-233685870
21 Jul
21 Jul
5:58 a.m.
Unfortunately there was no time yet for it in my side. If you like and have time for it,
duplicate the dispatcher module to dispatcheravl (or you can think of another name), apply
your patch and make a pull request with the new module and then I can accept the pull
request. Then we can think if there is some parts that new module can reuse from the old
one to avoid as much as possible code duplication.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-234163971
11:12 a.m.
@miconda there's no problem to copy dispatcher. But who's gonna test the new one?
About code duplication: the whole dispatcher logic is common for these 2 modules. The only
difference is how we iterate through the "list" of pools and indexed search. The
only way for improvement I see at the moment is to unify iteration and that was in my
todo's.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-234224643
12 Sep
12 Sep
2:52 p.m.
Resuming after the holidays season -- so, based on your latest comments we should just
merge. I looked a bit more at the patch, the indexing is only for dispatcher sets
(groups), still don on an integer id. The addresses in each set are still kept as a list,
right?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-246373259
2:57 p.m.
Well the idea was to split these changes. Should I update the PR to include both?
(hopefully will have some free time in a couple of weeks)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-246375073
3:27 p.m.
Keeping the addresses in a list makes it optimal for round robin, which is something I
like to have.
Indexing the set ids in a tree is useful when one has lots of groups, but for addresses
might add penalties to some very used algorithms. Also, I don't know if anyone has
lots of addresses inside same group to make it worth on indexing with a different
structure.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-246385272
3:38 p.m.
Hmmm... Looks like my bad - should have had a better description of an objective. The only
2 things I want to have are:
1. Indexed groups (no change for a list of destinations inside)
2. String id's insead of int's (still no change inside groups)
So the PR is for p1
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-246388916
3:40 p.m.
Thanks, clear now. I will try to get all sorted and reviewed, then merge this PR.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#issuecomment-246389765
19 Sep
19 Sep
9:01 a.m.
Merged #578.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/578#event-793734245
2795
days inactive
2946
days old
13 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alekzander Spiridonov -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla