13 Mar
2023
13 Mar
'23
4:41 p.m.
Thanks for the PR. The patch uses standard malloc, which is not the right choice in the tm module. So I understand the problem is that the header is stored inside the transaction as "Call-ID", but the provider sends back it as "CALL-ID"? What about just using then strncasecmp (similar as for the CSEQ) for the Call-Id field? Are you able to test a patch?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3393#issuecomment-1466498280
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: kamailio/kamailio/pull/3393/c1466498280@github.com