24 Mar
2022
24 Mar
'22
8:55 a.m.
On 24/03/2022 07:36, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello Daniel,
I am not completely sure if I can follow your reasoning. Even if you just take certain
parts of a performance or work, the complete performance or work stays under copyright.
If you take one single frame out of a video, it does not reveal what the
person was saying
Example: a band is performing a song at a concert. If you take a photo
or if you take one frame from the video, it does not reveal any of the
words or music. Therefore, the copyright on the words and music are not
part of the equation for the still image / frame / photograph.
Even if you record only a song of a full concert the
copyright still belongs to the artist. Of course, there is a lower boundary here, as
already mentioned for fair use or scientific usage etc..
Actually, copyright also belongs to the person who wrote the song.
But before spending more time discussing about the
licence particularities, why you are actually interested in this topic?
I use some of the images from my own speeches. I felt it was respectful
to clarify the copyright on these images. Based on our discussion, that
copyright probably belongs to Pascom, unless there was some contract or
some other email exchange where they already licensed or granted the
copyright to the community.
If any speaker ever wants to use their image in a book or something it
could be more significant.
Do you want to use the KamailioWorld recording
commercially, want to distribute them in a compilation which you want to sub-licence or
similar?
No, I didn't have plans like that right now
Regards,
Daniel
--
https://danielpocock.com