24 January 2014 18:04, Andrew Mortensen <admorten(a)isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Richard Good <richard.good(a)smilecoms.com> wrote:
Hi
The attached patch fixes our problem.
As you suggested delete_shtable takes a subs_t pointer as an argument and compares the
dialog's full tag set before deleting.
If everyone is OK with this patch, on Monday I will look at a patch for the RLS module -
it looks a little bit tricky as I think RLS exports the pres_delete_shtable through its
own API as rls_delete_shtable, though I'm not 100% sure on this.
Looks good to me. Thanks.
andrew
On 23 January 2014 17:24, Andrew Mortensen <admorten(a)isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Jason Penton <jason.penton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Andrew,
Shot for the prompt response. I am happy to make these changes if we all agree... I was
concerned like you of the impact on the consumers, but as you say just RLS.
Can I go ahead?
You have my support. Post the patch here for review.
andrew
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Mortensen <admorten(a)isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
On Jan 23, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Jason Penton <jason.penton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey all,
I was taking a look at the presence module API code, specfically the API code for the
hash table. I see that when we delete a subscription according to hash.c:
[snip]
Why are we only searching on to-tag? What if there is a collision on the hash AND the
to-tag is the same for 2+ different subscriptions. This is even more likely of happening
considering that the hash calculation is based only on the callid and to-tag...
At least nominally the tag should be globally unique, per RFC3261:
19.3 ... When a tag is generated by a UA for insertion into a request or
response, it MUST be globally unique and cryptographically random
with at least 32 bits of randomness.
But I agree that poorly behaved UAs could cause problems here. (We actually ran into
duplicate to-tags recently with vendor handsets booted simultaneously.)
It looks to me like we should be calling search_shtable, which compares the dialog's
full tag set. The problem is that unlike other similar calls, delete_shtable doesn't
take a subs_t pointer as an argument, so the only point of reference is the to-tag.
Fortunately it looks like there's only one place delete_shtable's called in the
presence module, so it shouldn't be much work to start using search_shtable to find
the subscription to delete.
To complicate things further, though, delete_shtable is exported as part of the presence
API, so we'd need to update all API consumers as well. That doesn't seem
unreasonable, as a quick git grep indicates the only current user of the presence API is
the rls module.
andrew
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications at
http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer
<presence_mod.diff>_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
<rls_mod.diff>_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org