There is an ongoing effort to merge duplicate modules or move them into the obsolete folder. Most used ones are from modules_k.
-ovidiu
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Konstantin M. evilzluk@gmail.com wrote:
I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which modules are valid ? +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | module_name | modules | modules_k | modules_s | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | acc_radius | | x | x | | auth_db | | x | x | | auth_radius | | x | x | | cpl-c | | x | x | | domain | | x | x | | exec | | x | x | | ldap | | x | x | | maxfwd | | x | x | | nathelper | | x | x | | permissions | | x | x | | pike | | x | x | | registrar | | x | x | | rr | | x | x | | textops | | x | x | | uri_db | | x | x | | usrloc | | x | x | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
2012/12/13 Konstantin M. evilzluk@gmail.com
Hello,
Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see: loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules but existing in modules_k and modules_s both. Which one is a valid ?