12 Dec
2012
12 Dec
'12
7:58 p.m.
There is an ongoing effort to merge duplicate modules or move them
into the obsolete folder.
Most used ones are from modules_k.
-ovidiu
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Konstantin M. <evilzluk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I did a small table of found duplicates, the same
question is: which modules
are valid ?
+===========================+=========+===========+===========+
| module_name | modules | modules_k | modules_s |
+===========================+=========+===========+===========+
| acc_radius | | x | x |
| auth_db | | x | x |
| auth_radius | | x | x |
| cpl-c | | x | x |
| domain | | x | x |
| exec | | x | x |
| ldap | | x | x |
| maxfwd | | x | x |
| nathelper | | x | x |
| permissions | | x | x |
| pike | | x | x |
| registrar | | x | x |
| rr | | x | x |
| textops | | x | x |
| uri_db | | x | x |
| usrloc | | x | x |
+===========================+=========+===========+===========+
2012/12/13 Konstantin M. <evilzluk(a)gmail.com>
> Hello,
>
> Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see:
> loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
>
> but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules
> but existing in modules_k and modules_s both.
> Which one is a valid ?