17 Oct
2014
17 Oct
'14
10:22 p.m.
On Oct 17, 2014, at 5:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
1) the 31 upper limit comes from tm cancelled branches bitmask, which
now is stored in an integer. Should be easy to get it to 63 (planned
after some testing that proves the concept used now is ok). Would it be
a need for even more?
We did some preliminary work to make this 63 as well (some years ago). I'm glad to see
this getting traction.
I'm generally opposed to hard limits like this. There are many cases where you might
want to ring a number of phones at once, and the sizes of those ring groups are currently
limited by this. I suspect that once we have > 31 in our production environment,
we'll quickly have a case that wants > 63.
But right now, I can only say that we have use cases > 31.
-- Jorj