16 Dec
2008
16 Dec
'08
4:22 p.m.
On 12/16/08 15:46, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Dec 16, 2008 at 15:33, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
one for all, or each for himself? In the first case we have to vote who
toss the coin :-) ...
we can leave it xyz now, future needs will be solved as they come.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
On 12/16/08 15:27, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
wrote:
In general they can't be used outside sr, unless you are very carefully
not to depend on anything from the core (e.g. mallocs).
I don't see any advantage in using either srxyz or xyz, so I don't think
we should enforce it.
Do we vote or toss a coin? :-)
On Dec 16, 2008 at 15:02, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
ok, and for sub-directories in lib/, should use srxyz? I am not sure now
someone will use these libs for development of other applications
Hello,
I couldn't get the message with a final decision regarding the library
naming scheme.
Andrei used libsr_xyz at some point, I also like this one. Henning
committed directly lib/trie in his branch.
It looks like most people prefer libsrxyz (without '_'). At
least
everybody agreed with libsrdb1 and libsrdb2.