24 Jun
2009
24 Jun
'09
3:08 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
i don't know about entire project. i just changed ser.cfg to
sip-router.cfg and what else it implied.
i asked about
renaming of ser.cfg on the list and jan replied that it is
ok.
so probably this means the entire project, or? IIRC I replied quite
quickly questioning such decision and suggesting to keep ser for now. I think such attitude is not going anywhere. What is
missing now is that
I would say "I am not going to be involved in anything having sip-router
hardwired". Sad to see this.
if you want to make it easy to use your own name, change Makefile system
so that no file names are hardwired. they simply my changing MAIN_NAME
you can get every file (config files, man pages, etc.) named whatever
way you like.
The problem that is risen now is the type of actions
taken, while we
agreed that any changes to common framework have to be properly
discussed on devel list, radical changes were done without this rule. I
know that this particular issue is a matter of tastes and personal
preferences, that's why needs careful handling.
i didn't rename any k files or their contents. i only edited and
renamed ser to sip-router. i thought that jan as member or ser project
could give such an ok.
-- juha