Hello Daniel
sorry about the delay, just one question the changes you made about this issue, are all ot these ``` commit c7e228eae76a432ea93fac7e95f50fe50979d79e Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 31 18:34:00 2023 +0200
pua: updates for the new t field names
commit c321f28ff657c921b8de2b84e66908f281d35d78 Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 31 18:22:23 2023 +0200
tm: use header attribute shortcuts to match inside t_lookup_callid()
commit 2bd1227b2440dd376c18e6c964f569e0e9ba4730 Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 31 15:18:13 2023 +0200
tm: keep shortcut the cseq header method
commit 734fd2910cd437205da870ad1e329eaefe2f043a Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 31 08:05:10 2023 +0200
sca: updates for the new t field names
commit ecd906dabbc5dc19d0fabb35d22320e2ba3fccf0 Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 31 08:04:59 2023 +0200
lcr: updates for the new t field names
commit 8f39d0ff741a3ba5819c6c0f96b8f575d30ab770 Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 31 08:04:43 2023 +0200
keepalive: updates for the new t field names
commit 927a2451e084e886d2548fdae3f5f4cd3abd0a4b Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 31 08:04:11 2023 +0200
dispatcher: updates for the new t field names
commit 8d69c0d68347198ccaea57a8ac4eeb040d19287a Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 31 08:02:10 2023 +0200
tm: rename shortcuts to from/to/callid/cseq headers
- reflect better that they are with header names - new fields to point to callid value and cseq number to facilitate use of them directly without new parsing or printing with header names ``` ? Apart of testing directly on master branch, if I tested on 5.4 for instance, should I cherry pick all of them? (asuming there are no conflicts) thanks a lot and regards david