24 Jun
2009
24 Jun
'09
10:22 a.m.
On 06/24/2009 04:01 PM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 14:49:37 Juha Heinanen
wrote:
This is very bad from project identity point of view. I have been few
weeks ago at a conference in Germany and telling people that I present
sip router, everyone asked "which one?" It really looks ridiculous to
say something like " I manufacture a car named 'car' " (or "I
develop a
sip router name sip router").
Therefore, if matters, there should be some other identifier for the
project to make it easy to refer to others.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
I like this proposal, look simple and clear.
We still have the problem that we haven't
decided yet on a short-name.
(while the project is called sip-router, we haven't decided on the short
binary name). Unfortunately this is proving to be very difficult since
there are a lot of very different opinions (we tried once before and we
gave up after 2 days because there was no agreement in sight).
my proposal is to call binary/config file sip-router/sip-router.cfg.
sr would be too short. tools, like ctl, could be prefixed with sr.