2 May
2013
2 May
'13
6:34 a.m.
30 apr 2013 kl. 20:16 skrev Juha Heinanen jh@tutpro.com:
Peter Dunkley writes:
If you look at the recent (yesterday and today) discussion on DISPATCH the conclusion appears to be that this is how it should work and that RFC 5626 should have been clearer on the behaviour.
i read the discussion and don't understand why would route set change. if ua looses connection to its proxy, it sets up a new one, but the proxy (which is in the route set established by r-r headers) is still the same.
If you are using edge proxys separate from the registrar, the new registration may come through another edge proxy, so the gruu will resolve in a new path to the client, which replaces the existing route through the possibly dead edge proxy.
/O