31 Oct
2013
31 Oct
'13
10:17 a.m.
On 31 October 2013 14:07, Olle E. Johansson <oej(a)edvina.net> wrote:
Hitting me with my own argument and code, that's cheating Peter :-)
It's fun to play dirty once in a while :-)
Well, DMQ is one very strange and advanced module, I
admit that. Like I
said earlier I think my discussion now is more generic to how we
communicate and build the product. I'm trying to change the attitude in a
large group of stubborn engineers, including most of me, myself and I...
I certainly favour having security (and easy to use security) as a goal.
But one of the things I like about Kamailio is the flexibility. For
example, secure signalling is harder to trace (that's kind of the point),
so when building a network I will tend do so with security disabled (or at
least not enforced) so that I can make sure I am happy with the routing,
and then tighten things up before I let other people on it.
Having said that, I haven't forgotten that I need
to work on your
to-do-list, Peter. TLS connection verification is one of the items high on
that list.
Indeed. Currently my personal hit-list for Kamailio 4.2 is:
- auth_ephemeral secrets in a database table
- per-message/frame deflate for WebSockets
- validation of outbound TLS connections
- SIP DANE
And if there is time I'd like to do some more work on MSRP too :-)
/O :-)
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Peter Dunkley
Technical Director
Crocodile RCS Ltd