8 Dec
2012
8 Dec
'12
8:58 a.m.
Olle E. Johansson writes:
is this acceptable to everyone? feel welcome to propose a better name for next_contacts_skip().
next_contact_flow()
#If we have no spare flow for current contact, go to next q level. if (!next_contact_flow()) next_contacts();
there may be more than one flow left to try because more than one ua may have registered the same aor, so better name would be next_contact_flows.
-- juha