27 May
2010
27 May
'10
6:53 p.m.
2010/5/27 Miklos Tirpak <miklos(a)iptel.org>rg>:
Well, I think there is a major difference even with
negative responses in
case of parallel forking. t_reply() immediately sends back a final reply and
cancels the pending branches. change_reply_status() affects only a single
branch that may not win at the end.
Thanks for the clarification. It makes sense as if the proxy sends a
final reply to the UAC it must terminate the pending branches.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>