Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Nov 21, 2008 at 04:34, Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote: [...]
Unless nobody objects, I would suggest we do the following:
- Convert both API versions into libraries. Here I would suggest some simpler name, sr_dbk sounds is cryptic, how about using just db1 and db2
possibly prefixed with sr (libsrdb1, libsrdb2)?Do we go for libsrdb[12] or somebody has a better ideea?
what about db (for ser's DB) and dbk for K's?
klaus
Do I keep the kamailio db history or we use directly Jan's version (no history)?
- Rename conflicting identifiers in both libraries, i.e. db_con1, db_con2, db_res1, db_res2.
I think we would have to rename the DB_* macros too: DB1_STR DB1_INT DB1_BLOB DB1_BIGINT DB1_DOUBLE DB1_STRING DB1_DATETIME DB1_BITMAP
From my point of view it's ok as long as we can write a script that would convert a module automatically (and all these are just simple search & replace).
- Merge database drivers from both projects. Here I would suggest we adopt the naming scheme from Kamailio and prefix all of them with db_.
I agree.
- Link modules that use db with one of the libraries.
- create scripts that would automatically update a kamailio or ser
module for use with sip-router
Andrei
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev