21 Nov
2008
21 Nov
'08
8:14 p.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Nov 21, 2008 at 04:34, Jan Janak
<jan(a)iptel.org> wrote:
[...]
what about db (for ser's DB) and dbk for K's?
klaus
Unless nobody objects, I would suggest we do
the following:
1) Convert both API versions into libraries. Here I would suggest some
simpler name, sr_dbk sounds is cryptic, how about using just db1 and db2
possibly prefixed with sr (libsrdb1, libsrdb2)?
Do we go for libsrdb[12] or somebody has a better ideea?
Do I keep the kamailio db history or we use directly Jan's version (no
history)?
2) Rename conflicting identifiers in both
libraries, i.e. db_con1, db_con2,
db_res1, db_res2.
I think we would have to rename the DB_* macros too:
DB1_STR DB1_INT DB1_BLOB DB1_BIGINT DB1_DOUBLE DB1_STRING DB1_DATETIME
DB1_BITMAP
From my point of view it's ok as long as we can write a script that
would convert a module automatically (and all these are just simple
search & replace).
2) Merge database drivers from both projects.
Here I would suggest we
adopt the naming scheme from Kamailio and prefix all of them with db_.
I agree.
4) Link modules that use db with one of the
libraries.
5) create scripts that would automatically update a kamailio or ser
module for use with sip-router
Andrei
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev