29 Apr
2010
29 Apr
'10
7:03 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax(a)sippysoft.com> wrote:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
I don't think it's intentional.
There was a thread discussing this a long time ago, see:
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-April/018559.html
Hope that helps.
-Jan
Why not to use a SIP/2.0 compliant branch (z9hG4bK...)? any reason?
Maybe this is the method to detect keep-alive replies and absorb them
before they enter dialplan processing.