@rfuchs requested changes on this pull request.
@@ -2529,6 +2551,7 @@ static bencode_item_t *rtpp_function_call(bencode_buffer_t *bencbuf, struct sip_
body.s = NULL; ng_flags.flags = bencode_list(bencbuf); + ng_flags.received-from = bencode_list(bencbuf);
Typo here (dash instead of underscore). Maybe at least try to compile it before submitting?
@@ -2649,13 +2672,18 @@ static bencode_item_t *rtpp_function_call(bencode_buffer_t *bencbuf, struct sip_
bencode_dictionary_add_str(ng_flags.dict, "via-branch", &viabranch); }
- item = bencode_list(bencbuf); - bencode_dictionary_add(ng_flags.dict, "received-from", item); - bencode_list_add_string(item, (msg->rcv.src_ip.af == AF_INET) ? "IP4" : ( - (msg->rcv.src_ip.af == AF_INET6) ? "IP6" : - "?" - ) ); - bencode_list_add_string(item, ip_addr2a(&msg->rcv.src_ip)); + if (ng_flags.received_from && ng_flags.received_from->child) { + bencode_dictionary_add(ng_flags.dict, "received-from", ng_flags.received_from); + } + else { + item = bencode_list(bencbuf);
Just a suggestion, but you could reuse `ng_flags.received_from` here instead of creating a new list item. But up to you.