Yes, just adding it now - the declared array is called "rfc1918nets" - should I change the name of the array or just add a comment for future reference?
On 6 March 2014 11:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/03/14 18:10, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 04/03/14 13:11, Charles Chance wrote:
Hello All,
Any objections if I update nat_traversal module to include CGN address space, similar to the patch submitted for nathelper module (with the correct address range)? Or does someone else have it in mind to do it?
go ahead and do it.
Are you planning to do it with backport for v4.1.2? Just checking, because it will be released in few hours.
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda