```
commit f97df2e6d4b9c721c97bcbd3b5930530604a127a
Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Date: Fri Sep 16 12:49:50 2016 +0200
crypto: updated to be compatible with api from libssl v1.1.0
(cherry picked from commit 8d83571658471f162e35cb54ba7e3baecbe7970d)
```
```
make every-module group_include=ktls
Makefile:56: modules.lst: No such file or directory
Makefile:107: config.mak: No such file or directory
target architecture <x86_64>, host architecture <x86_64>
making config...
saving modules list...
CC (gcc) [M auth_identity.so] auth_http.o
CC (gcc) [M auth_identity.so] auth_hdrs.o
CC (gcc) [M auth_identity.so] auth_tables.o
CC (gcc) [M auth_identity.so] auth_identity.o
CC (gcc) [M auth_identity.so] auth_crypt.o
CC (gcc) [M auth_identity.so] auth_dynstr.o
LD (gcc) [M auth_identity.so] auth_identity.so
CC (gcc) [M crypto.so] crypto_uuid.o
CC (gcc) [M crypto.so] crypto_mod.o
LD (gcc) [M crypto.so] crypto.so
CC (gcc) [M tls.so] tls_domain.o
tls_domain.c: In function 'setup_dh':
tls_domain.c:117:6: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'DH {aka struct
dh_st}'
dh->p = BN_bin2bn(dh3072_p, sizeof(dh3072_p), NULL);
^~
tls_domain.c: In function 'sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback':
tls_domain.c:717:10: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'SSL {aka const
struct ssl_st}'
if (ssl->s3) {
^~
tls_domain.c: In function 'tls_ssl_ctx_set_freelist':
tls_domain.c:841:6: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'SSL_CTX {aka
struct ssl_ctx_st}'
ctx->freelist_max_len = val;
^~
tls_domain.c: In function 'tls_server_name_cb':
tls_domain.c:930:46: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'SSL {aka struct
ssl_st}'
SSL_set_options(ssl, SSL_CTX_get_options(ssl->ctx));
^~
../../Makefile.rules:97: recipe for target 'tls_domain.o' failed
make[1]: *** [tls_domain.o] Error 1
Makefile:511: recipe for target 'modules' failed
make: *** [modules] Error 1
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/834#issuecomment-256667281