24 Jun
2009
24 Jun
'09
10:39 a.m.
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 15:22:50 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 06/24/2009 04:01 PM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
wrote:
Hi Daniel, I was just speaking about the binary/config name, not the project
name.
I supposed that if sip-router is been used as project name from the beginning,
chaning it now could be dangerous ... another project name change in less
than a year ? ... buff I don't see it
--
Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
Dimensión Virtual
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 14:49:37 Juha Heinanen
wrote:
This is very bad from project identity point of view. I have been few
weeks ago at a conference in Germany and telling people that I present
sip router, everyone asked "which one?" It really looks ridiculous to
say something like " I manufacture a car named 'car' " (or "I
develop a
sip router name sip router").
Therefore, if matters, there should be some other identifier for the
project to make it easy to refer to others.
Cheers,
Daniel Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
I like this proposal, look simple and clear. We still have the problem that we haven't
decided yet on a
short-name. (while the project is called sip-router, we haven't
decided on the short binary name). Unfortunately this is proving to
be very difficult since there are a lot of very different opinions
(we tried once before and we gave up after 2 days because there was
no agreement in sight).
my proposal is to call binary/config file sip-router/sip-router.cfg.
sr would be too short. tools, like ctl, could be prefixed with sr.