On 13.09.2011 22:12, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
13 sep 2011 kl. 22:10 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo:
2011/9/13 Daniel-Constantin
Mierla<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
>
> you started the discussion when many of us were partying for 10 years
> celebration :-) so it got lost -- reminders are recommended always.
>
> There is no real good reason why not accepting unknown transport
> protocols
> non-top Vias. The limitation is coming from implementation of the
> parser,
> but should be relaxed.
>
> The best would be to introduce PROTO_OTHER in the enum of protocols
> (ip_addr.h, enum sip_protos) and in case this type is encountered, read
> the
> string value of the protocol.
>
> Via parser is using quite a lot of states, so if you look to update it,
> when
> it gets to the state where the transport (proto) part starts, if does
> not
> match UDP, TCP, TLS or SCTP, then set vb->proto=PROTO_OTHER and start
> and
> length of the token in vb->transport. Should not be very complex to
> enhance
> once you get into via parser states.
>
> I may fix it before 3.2.0 is out if you are not doing it meanwhile, but
> cannot give you a timeline for it right now.
Thanks a lot Daniel !
I will try to do it by myself by following your useful indications. If
I get it I will announce prior to commiting it.
That reminds me of my favorite issue: Is it possible to get Kamailio to
accept other URI schemes than SIP and SIPS?
Oh yes, tm module fails for example if RURI is a service URN.
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org