2010/7/12 Timo Reimann <timo.reimann(a)1und1.de>de>:
I'm not sure why dialog termination points in time
differ for
UA-/proxy-initiated BYE requests. Is there a rationale that proxies
triggering dialog termination need to ensure that UAs respond or
time-out before they can destroy the dialog? How does it differ from
UA-initiated dialog terminations?
I strongly believe (as RFC 3261 states) that a proxy SHOULD NOT
generate in-dialog requests. In fact, 'dialog' module is a bit "hack"
;)
IMHO when a proxy-generated BYE is sent (to both caller and callee)
that should be enough to set the dialog in 'terminated' state. There
is no reason to behave different than when handling a UA-initiated
BYE.
Maybe you have an idea on this; I will continue thinking about it. In
any case, the "always decrement counter during BYE processing" isn't
strictly required for the designated fix if the "deny proxy-initiated
call termination for non-confirmed calls" rule is in effect. That's
because confirmed dialogs should always transition to the terminated
state on processing of the BYE request and thereby decrement the counter.
Too much thinking about dialog today. I need a break. :)
Ok, I also need a break to see the goal again and again XDDD
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>