20 Jul
2009
20 Jul
'09
12:23 p.m.
On 20.07.2009 18:14 Uhr, Klaus Darilion wrote:
what about sr modules (s and k)? Or does behave
sr-core different?
version from modules_k should be removed and modules_s/sanity
moved to
modules/. K 1.5 version was an adapted import of S version.
Daniel
klaus
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
> Revision: 5904
> http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=5904&view=rev
> Author: miconda
> Date: 2009-07-20 15:05:13 +0000 (Mon, 20 Jul 2009)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> - proper return code check for r-uri parsing
> - reported by Dubravko Caric
>
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
> branches/1.5/modules/sanity/sanity.c
>
>
> This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development
> platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-bootcamp/