6 Jul
2011
6 Jul
'11
3:56 a.m.
Am 05.07.2011 19:04, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo:
2011/7/5 Jan Janak jan@ryngle.com:
So what is the difference then? How is a Route header with sips scheme different from a Route header with the transport=tls parameter? Is the proxy server supposed to treat Route headers with sips differently than Route headers with sip;transport=tls?
No, the only difference is that transport=tls is deprecated and """"maybe"""" some devices don't understand ;transport=tls.
I just wonder why it is deprecated at all? IIRC "sips:" does not mandate any protocol, just that encryption must be used. Thus, plain TCP over IPsec would also fulfill "sips:", but for sure is different than TLS+TCP.
regards Klaus