Re: [sr-dev] [SR-Users] 3.1.x and Kamailio compatibility mode

On 5/25/11 6:35 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

Klaus Darilion writes:

...

What exactly is the difference?

It would be great if we could unify SER and Kamailio.

that would indeed be great.

hmm, that was probably left in Andrei's work, I removed everything I added to 3.0 in regard to compatibility mode in 3.1, I will check the sources.

one difference is in module interface. in k modules, arguments need to be in quotes, but not in s modules. this creates lots of confusion when using both s and k modules.

This shouldn't be valid. IIRC, it is a matter of the parser, not the module interface. What function from K modules you tried and what were the parameters?

Cheers, Daniel