Re: [sr-dev] More about locally generated 408

On 4/12/10 1:28 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

Henning Westerholt writes:

...

hm, i'd opt to keep the 408 here. What about setting a flag if you received a provisional response in reply_route, and then check this in your failure_route when you process the 408? We do it this way, and did not found any problems so far. I think Juha also proposed something like this earlier.

yes, that is what i proposed and have been using myself for years. i don't see any need to make changes in tm for this.

in 3.0 there are some extra functions that may help figuring out the type of timeout - t_branch_timeout() and t_branch_replied(): http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#t_branch_timeout

Cheers, Daniel