4 Nov
2011
4 Nov
'11
7:35 a.m.
Hey Henning,
Ahh, thanks for that, thats perfect for now!
A pity, those names should have been a little more descriptive ;)
Thanks
Jason
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Henning Westerholt <hw(a)kamailio.org> wrote:
On Thursday 03 November 2011, Jason Penton wrote:
For Asserted and preferred identities, we
don't need to parse the
content,
but in other headers I have not gotten to yet, we
may need to.
Hi Jason,
do you talk about p-asserted and p-preferred header? This are fairly
standard
headers, there are even some PVs to access them right now i think.
Please help me understand, I would have thought
from an architecture
perspective, we would populate the sip_msg structure with all possible
sip
headers as well as the parsers. What is the
reason we don't do this
currently? performance?
I'd guess the reasons is memory efficiency. The structure get bigger and
bigger with every pointer. But for p-asserted and p-preffered, they are
already included it seems:
struct hdr_field* pai;
struct hdr_field* ppi;
Best regards,
Henning