Re: [sr-dev] Why doesn't Kamailio handler x-NAT field ?

@Simon

Yes, when either caller or callee is behind symmetric NAT, I want to activate RTP proxy. I think that makes sense

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca

wrote:

Le 2013-03-05 13:20, Alex Balashov a écrit :

Many router out there are using Full cone NAT.

...

...

Yes, but how does full cone NAT change the treatment you must give to the SIP client on the far (proxy) end?

I guess he wants to activate RTP proxying for clients behind a symmetric NAT only.

Simon

______________________________**_________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**devhttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev