With regards dmq/dmq_usrloc and in-memory replication, doesn't dmq know when a node is
down/removed from the bus? If it does, then maybe a background thread could fire to
(e|se)lect one of the remaining nodes to take over from the node that is down and
manipulate/override aor's of the downed host on the (ese)lected registrar. I don't
think this would work for shared-db mode though.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1299#issuecomment-341722924