Re: [sr-dev] Why is any bflag visible under failure_route?

2010/3/25 Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc@aliax.net:

Why is such bflag set when inspecting it in failure_route for the second branch? the branch creating such negative final response (Branch-2) hasn't such bflag active. Is it the expected behaviour due to something I miss? or is it a posible bug?

Well, in case of parallel forking in which bflags is just set for some branches, it would be really difficult to determine which should be the status of such bflag after all the branches have failed, so most probably what I'm trying to achieve makes no sense.

I think I shoul dplay with a flag (instead of bflag) and use "set" and "unset" in each case.