30 Oct
2017
30 Oct
'17
8:44 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Another way could be adding a new field, extended
flags, with a
different set of functions to handle them like
setflagx()/resetflagx(...)/isflagxset(...), so the current behaviour
is not affected at all.
That would be fine with me.
view I think using an array (static size) is better
than single value
field. Initially it can be of uint32_t[2] to give access to 64 more
flags, but in the future it can be changed if needed. The functions
will take two parameters, bit index and array index.
That would be too complex to use. A flag should be a single integer.
-- Juha
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1288#issuecomment-340545188