Re: [sr-dev] problem with locally generated ACKs

On 12/18/09 2:21 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

...

Isn't the RFC requiring to send cancel and negative ack to the same destination as INVITE?

in the case that i reported, the ack was to 200 ok and thus not part of invite/200 ok transaction. in that case, the ack should be sent to contact uri of 200 ok (there was no rr in 200 ok).

ahh, right, I got it wrong in the first place.

Then, in this case, might be good to call the event_route as well. I was thinking the case of negative reply, where no much could have been done in terms of routing.

Cheers, Daniel