16 Apr
2012
16 Apr
'12
8:45 p.m.
Hello,
On 4/16/12 6:13 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
agree, the check on supported header will be
added once sorted out the
overlapping with 5626. My note had only the role of clarifying that is
harmless in terms of SIP routing.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio Advanced Training, April 23-26, 2012, Berlin, Germany
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/kamailio-advanced-training/
On the other hand, if the device doesn't
understand gruu, it will just
ignore the temp/pub gruu addresses (they are header parameters) -- snom
does it since it implement an old draft of gruu (-02 according to their
wiki) , where only 'gruu' parameter was specified.
i agree that if ua does
not support gruu, it can ignore the extra
params, but it is waste of proxy resources and increases packet size if
gruu params are included for vain.