ovoshlook left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4304)
Thanks for the comment. That's a good point. Initially, I was thinking of covering all initial uncovered requests. However: - `t_should_relay_response` is quite a sensitive function for large changes. - The patch covers a particular edge case related to a particular issue. - Spreading the context may disrupt the clarity of the edge case and code. Moving forward with atomic features was a better approach for me.
According to the questions, it seems the feature's purpose is much clearer now. If no objections, then I'll cover the rest within this feature branch.