kamailio.org
Sign In
Sign Up
Sign In
Sign Up
Manage this list
×
Keyboard Shortcuts
Thread View
j
: Next unread message
k
: Previous unread message
j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
2025
February
January
2024
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2023
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2022
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2021
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2020
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2019
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2018
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2017
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2016
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2015
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2014
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2013
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2012
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2011
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2010
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2009
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2008
December
November
List overview
Download
thread
Re: [sr-dev] handling failed t_relay() when multiple usr locations
jh@tutpro.com
10 Mar 2010
10 Mar '10
6:11 a.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
...
That's because you're in tcp non-async mode (not recommended in general, unless you have to use tls).
andrei, do you plan to make also tls to work in async tcp mode for version 3.1? -- juha
0
0
Reply
Back to the thread
Back to the list